1 / 17

Going Green: Collaborative Strategies for Year 1 Implementation of Online Evaluation Platform

The Going Green Jigsaw Approach brings together analysis teams to summarize pilot feedback and recommend actionable strategies for sustainability in online evaluations. After presentations and reflections, participants will engage in brainstorming sessions to prioritize initiatives for Year 1 implementation using the NCDPI Retreat Planning Document. Key considerations include ensuring platform security, ease of use for submissions, and managing evaluations effectively. Join us to collaborate on creating a more environmentally friendly and efficient online platform for education.

temima
Download Presentation

Going Green: Collaborative Strategies for Year 1 Implementation of Online Evaluation Platform

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Going Green – Jigsaw Approach Each Analysis Team will present a summary of the feedback on their topic from the pilot, with recommendations. Individually, we will consider the information just presented and brainstorm ways to Go Green.

  2. Going Green – Jigsaw Approach After the last presentation and reflection, we will take a break and then use the NCDPI Retreat Planning Doc (http://bit.ly/NCDPIRetreat) for Going Green. As we work, please join a planning group and start prioritizing for Year 1.

  3. ASW Pilot Analysis Online Platform and General Feedback

  4. Submitter Survey Question #8

  5. Submitter Survey Question #9

  6. Submitter Survey Question #10

  7. Evaluator Survey Question #10

  8. Evaluator Survey Question #11

  9. Evaluator Survey Question #12

  10. General Feedback

  11. Moving Forward with Online Platform • Non-Negotiable • Secure • Double-Blind Evaluation and trigger for 3rd evaluation if needed • Unique Identifier for Submitters and Raters • Ease of Use • Single page with tabs • File type homogenizer which handles uploads • File viewer built into system • Clear Directions and Training • Submission Process • Types of Submissions and limits • Evaluation Process

  12. Moving Forward……….. • To Be Determined • Which platform moving forward • Timeline for development or adaptation • Training and materials • Size and type of files • Who will manage the submissions timeline • What is the process if submissions are not complete and therefore not ratable • Who will manage the distribution of rater assignments • Who will manage the completion of ratings/follow up with assigned raters who have not completed • Will there be an arbitration process and how will this be managed in the online platform • Data Transfer to EVAAS: Format and Timing • HelpDesk: technical; policy oriented • Which system do we integrate with for the coming year: SchoolNet, PowerSchool, Identity Access Management, or NCEducation for the 2013-2014 school year

  13. GLADiS Software • GLADiS • Evidence Collection Tool • Allows for Peer Review • Accepts a variety of formats • Accessible until portfolio is closed for submission • Accessible outside of MCS network

  14. Going Green – Jigsaw Approach Individually, consider the feedback and recommendations just presented and brainstorm ways to Go Green with the Analysis of Student Work (ASW) Online Platform

  15. Planning Groups Form & Prioritize for Year 1 Implementation Needs

  16. Year 1 Implementation

  17. 1:00 – 3:45 p.m. Work Sessions for Planning GroupsJoin a group at http://bit.ly/NCDPIRetreat

More Related