1 / 16

Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5). RHETORIC is the art of PERSUASION. It differs from LOGIC , which seeks to establish a conclusion. Rhetoric uses the psychological (rhetorical) force of expressions to influence our attitudes. EXAMPLE:.

Download Presentation

Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)

  2. RHETORIC is the art of PERSUASION. It differs from LOGIC, which seeks to establish a conclusion.

  3. Rhetoric uses the psychological (rhetorical) force of expressions to influence our attitudes.

  4. EXAMPLE: Calling a scientist a “so-called” scientist suggests he/she is something less than a true scientist. It DOWNPLAYS his/her credentials.

  5. NOTHING WRONG with trying to be persuasive or with using rhetoric to dress up or sell an argument. Good writers choose words carefully, to make their writing persuasive.

  6. But this is CRITICAL THINKING! It means not being SEDUCED by rhetoric.

  7. Being able to make wise decisions and reasonable and well-founded judgments… …depends largely on our ability to “see through” rhetoric to evidence and argument.

  8. We should be able to do this: Distinguish between rhetoric and argument Be able to identify the more common forms of rhetoric

  9. Specifically, these: • Euphemism/dysphemism • Persuasive analogy, persuasive definition, and persuasive explanation • Innuendo • Loaded question • Hyperbole • Stereotype • Ridicule/sarcasm • Weaseler • Downplayer • Proof surrogate

  10. Specific rhetorical devices. • Ridicule/Sarcasm “John McCain made a great speech last night. Everyone awakened feeling refreshed.”

  11. Specific rhetorical devices. • Hyperbole (hype; exaggeration) “Is Deborah generous? She’d give you her life savings if she thought you were in need.”

  12. Specific rhetorical devices. • Euphemism (makes it sound better) “collateral damage”; “sleeping around” • Dysphemism (makes it sound worse) “junk food”; “geezer”

  13. Rhetoricaldefinition “An environmentalist is a tree-hugging extremist.” • Rhetoricalexplanation “The reason environmentalists won’t let you cut down a tree is they want to put everyone out of work.” • Rhetoricalanalogy “Your average environmentalist is about as smart as a toilet seat.”

  14. Stereotype “What did he expect marrying her? She’s just a dumbblond.” • Downplayer “Pornography is a problem, but we must protect free speech.” “These self-appointed experts on the environment are just trying to scare us.” • Proofsurrogate “Clearly she shouldn’t have done that.”

  15. Innuendo “I didn’t say Bush invaded Iraq to help his buddies in the oil industry. I just said his buddies have done very well since the invasion.” • Weaseler • Loaded question —rests on an assumption that should have been established but wasn’t “When did you stop cheating on your girl friend?” “This may cure your problem.”

  16. One final caution: • NEVER dismiss a statement or argument simply because it contains rhetoric. Rhetoric has a legitimate place in discourse. A solid claim or a good argument may well contain powerful rhetoric. • But don’t accept a statement/argument BECAUSE of its rhetorical force. Evaluate it on its MERITS!

More Related