190 likes | 266 Views
This study by Steve Morgan and Gillian Hanley analyzes the persistence of prescription drug costs among the population of British Columbia. The research delves into the patterns of high-cost users, demographics, morbidity distribution, and the impact of catastrophic coverage policies. Using data from 2001 and 2004, the study sheds light on the complex dynamics of pharmaceutical expenditure and healthcare financing. The findings suggest that high-cost Rx use is influenced by age and morbidity, highlighting the need for appropriate policy interventions.
E N D
Chronic Catastrophes:Concentration and persistence of Rx costs among the population of British Columbia Steve Morgan, Gillian HanleyJune 2008 – AcademyHealth ARM – Washington DC
Motivation • ‘High users’ docs and hospitals = well studied • Prescription drugs need studying because… • Historically less interest • Possibly different patterns of need • Very different systems of financing (growing ‘catastrophic’ coverage in US & Canada)
Data • Administrative records, 2001 and 2004 BC PharmaNet all prescriptions, all costs, all persons “BCLHD” vital stats, MD visits, hospital visits, income • ‘Study population’ ~ BC population 3.85 million individuals (who met residency criteria)
Concepts • Classifying Rx use • High cost = top 5% by Rx spending • Medium cost = the next 10% by Rx spending • Low cost = all others with some Rx spending • Non users = all those with no Rx spending • Health status measure • Aggregated Diagnostic Groups [range: 0 to 32 ADGs] • Death
Conclusion • High-cost Rx use appears … … relatively explainable by way of age and morbidity … relatively persistent by way of 3-year follow-up • Are ‘catastrophic’ coverage policies therefore appropriate? (Is the house burning down once, or …?)