1 / 16

Climate Change Tilting at windmills?

Climate Change Tilting at windmills?. Jonathan Clay 2-3 Gray’s Inn Square London. Is it happening at all?. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007 states : Atmospheric concentration of CO2 has increased from pre-industrial value of 280ppm to 380 ppm in 2005.

Download Presentation

Climate Change Tilting at windmills?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Climate Change Tilting at windmills? Jonathan Clay 2-3 Gray’s Inn Square London

  2. Is it happening at all? Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007 states : • Atmospheric concentration of CO2 has increased from pre-industrial value of 280ppm to 380 ppm in 2005. • The primary source of increased atmospheric CO2 results from use of fossil fuel with a further contribution from land use changes. • Atmospheric CO2 already far exceeds the natural range over the last 650,000 years.(180-300 ppm) • IPCC scientists consider 9/10 likelihood that current warming is due (at least in part) to the effect of human activities, in particular the burning of fossil fuels.

  3. Effects of Climate Change • Global average temperature increase of 1 degree since 1900. • Largest increase in the last 40 years • Global sea level rising • Snow cover reduced • Melting of ice caps and glaciers • Changes in precipitation amounts, ocean salinity, wind patterns, incidence of extreme weather –wind patterns, droughts, heat waves, intensity of tropical cyclones

  4. Government’s Response • PPS 22 Renewable Energy 2004 • Energy Review 2006 • Consultation Draft PPS “Planning and Climate Change” (supplement to PPS1) November 2006 • Code for Sustainable Homes December 2006

  5. PPS22 Renewable Energy • 15 page Policy Statement • 182 page Companion Guide! • Renewable energy covers “those energy flows that occur naturally and repeatedly in the environment – wind, water, movement of oceans, sun and biomass”.

  6. PPS 22 continued • Relevant technologies: • Onshore wind • Hydro • Photovoltaics • Passive solar • Biomass and energy crops • Energy from waste (but not energy from mass incineration of domestic waste) and landfill • Sewage gas. • But note principles for waste management decisions in PPG 10

  7. PPS 22 continued 8 key principles: • Renewable energy developments capable of being accommodated throughout England. • RSS and LDD s should promote, not restrict development of renewables. • No policies which rule out or even place constraints on renewables development. • Wider environmental and economic benefits of all renewable energy projects should be given significant weight whatever their scale. • Do not make technical assumptions about locations – technology may change. • Do not reject applications because output levels are small • Ensure early engagement and involvement of affected communities. • Development proposals must demonstrate environmental, social and economic benefits and how environmental and social impacts have been minimised.

  8. PPS 22 Continued Other features: • Targets - expressed as a minimum • Monitoring of targets • If target is likely to be met, increase it! • Criteria based policies, not site allocations. • Protection of Internationally and nationally designated sites and Green Belts. • Locally designations do not justify refusal. • Criteria based site selection • No sequential assessment

  9. PPS 22 Continued Key Material Effects: • Landscape and visual effects • Cumulative effects • Noise • Odour • Transport • Aviation and radar

  10. Energy Review July 2006 • Main objective - to reduce carbon emissions • Stated to be material consideration, adding support to existing planning policy. • Strategy based on commitment to the Renewables Obligation • “Clear statement on nuclear power” • “Reform of the Planning System” which takes “in principle decision out of the public inquiry process, leave the PI system to focus on local planning and environmental issues; or “how the specific local impacts of construction and operation of the plant can be minimised”

  11. Energy Review under challenge • Greenpeace v DTI [2007] EWHC 311 (Admin) per Sullivan J. • "Where a public authority has issued a promise or adopted a practice which represents how it proposes to act in a given area, the law will require the promise or practice to be honoured unless there is good reason not to do so." (see per Laws LJ at paragraph 68 of R (Nadarajah and Abdi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWCA Civ 1363) • In R v North & East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan [2001] QB 213, Lord Woolf MR giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal said in paragraph 108: “ It is common ground that, whether or not consultation of interested parties and the public is a legal requirement, if it is embarked upon it must be carried out properly. To be proper, consultation must be undertaken at a time when proposals are still at a formative stage; it must include sufficient reasons for particular proposals to allow those consulted to give intelligent consideration and an intelligent response; adequate time must be given for this purpose; and the product of consultation must be conscientiously taken into account when the ultimate decision is taken: R v Brent London Borough Council, Ex p Gunning (1985) 84 LGR 168."

  12. Energy Review under challengeGreenpeace v DTI continued • " It is an accepted general principle of administrative law that a public body undertaking consultation must do so fairly as required by the circumstances of the case " see per Auld LJ at paragraph 90 of Edwards. • “The consultation exercise was very seriously flawed. Adopting the test put forward by Mr Drabble [for Greenpeace], "something has gone clearly and radically wrong." • There could be no proper consultation, let alone "the fullest public consultation" as promised in the 2003 White Paper • “There was therefore procedural unfairness, and a breach of the claimant's legitimate expectation that there would be "the fullest public consultation" before a decision was taken to support new nuclear build.” • Declaration: a breach of the claimant's legitimate expectation to fullest public consultation; that the consultation process was procedurally unfair; and that therefore the decision in the Energy Review that nuclear new build "has a role to play ..." was unlawful.

  13. Consultation Draft PPS “Planning and Climate Change” Nov. 2006 • Aim: to set “a framework for achieving zero carbon development” • Builds on policies in PPS1 • Ensure that development plans contribute to global sustainability by addressing the causes and impacts of climate change. • Seven key planning objectives

  14. Consultation Draft PPS “Planning and Climate Change” Nov 2006 • 1. Make full contribution to delivering Government climate change programme • 2. Secure highest viable standards of resource and energy efficiency in new development • 3. Make fullest possible use of sustainable transport • 4. Secure new development and shape places resilient to climate change • 5. Sustain biodiversity • 6. Reflect development needs and interests of communities • 7. Respond to concern of business and encourage technical innovation.

  15. Consultation Draft PPS “Planning and Climate Change” Nov 2006 • Integration with Building Regulations • Important to be clear about distinction between role of planning policy and building regulations • DPDs will set policies for provision of low carbon and renewable sources of energy to “provide the platform” to secure increased efficiency required by Building Regs • In interim (before plans adopted) planning authorities should require standard of 10 %. • Where there are local opportunities for requiring higher levels of building performance these should be set out in a DPD.

  16. Code for Sustainable Homes • Not planning policy guidance • Voluntary code, but house builders should follow it because the Government is considering making the Code mandatory. • Based on BRE’s “Eco Homes” System which has been used especially for social housing development. • Sits “…alongside the planning system which guides sustainability in broader locations and aesthetic issues.” • Provides a scoring system “sustainability rating” in design categories such as energy, water, materials, surface water run off, waste, pollution, health and well being, management, ecology. • Star ratings from * to ****** (1 to 6 stars) 1= 10% better than Part L 2006 ; 6 = zero carbon.

More Related