1 / 19

IILACE 10 TH Anniversary Conference Access to Justice in South Africa: A Combined Effort Required

IILACE 10 TH Anniversary Conference Access to Justice in South Africa: A Combined Effort Required presented by Patrick Hundermark Legal Development Executive Legal Aid Board South Africa. Introduction. SA Constitution Protects Rights

Download Presentation

IILACE 10 TH Anniversary Conference Access to Justice in South Africa: A Combined Effort Required

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IILACE 10TH Anniversary Conference Access to Justice in South Africa: A Combined Effort Required presented by Patrick Hundermark Legal Development Executive Legal Aid Board South Africa Access to Justice

  2. Introduction • SA Constitution Protects Rights • Achieved by enabling access to the courts to resolve all justiciable disputes (both civil and criminal) • Must be open access to courts • Must have right to legal representation • Must be assisted if unable to afford the cost of such legal representation. Access to Justice

  3. What is access to justice? • Able to approach a court free of barriers or obstacles • Legal representation integral to access to justice • Unable to afford private legal representation, then state to provide where substantial injustice arises • Effectively enforce the court order Access to Justice

  4. A clearer right? • Children under 18 in both criminal and civil matters (Section 28(1)(h) & 35(3)) • Accused Persons (Section 35(3)) Access to Justice

  5. Limitation of rights? • Section 36 - all the rights capable of limitation in terms of a law of general application • Legal Aid Act empowers scheme to be set out in LAG which contains limitation on types of matters and sets means/affordability test • Abuse right of access to the courts becoming vexatious litigants Access to Justice

  6. Historical Context • Prior to 1994 access to justice not constitutional right  • Apartheid era Acts of parliament limited access to justice by imposing limitations relating to time frames for launching proceedings and shortened prescription periods - More so where organs of state sued in delictual claims • Right to legal representation recognised but no right to legal aid where not able to afford Access to Justice

  7. Human Rights Instruments • Various Instruments Internationally • South Africa is a signatory to • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights • African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights. Access to Justice

  8. SA Constitution • Four main provisions which relate to access to justice • Civil Matters • Section 28(1)(h) • Section 34 • Criminal Matters • Section 35(2)(b) • Section 35(3)(f) & (g) Access to Justice

  9. SA Courts Approach • S v Makwanyane and Others - death sentence found unconstitutional • S v Vermaas; S v Du Plessis – Legal representation at state expense and own choice • S v Steyn – Leave to appeal found unconstitutional • Shinga v The State and Another – New Leave to Appeal provisions found constitutional Access to Justice

  10. SA Courts Approach • Beinash v Ernst and Young – Limitation in Vexatious Proceedings Act • Bernstein v Bester NO - Section 22 of the Interim Constitution contained no right to a fair civil trial. The court also refused to imply that there was a right to a fair civil trial. This has, however, been remedied by section 34 which now guarantees the right to a fair civil trial Access to Justice

  11. SA Courts Approach • Nkuzi Development Association v Government of the Republic of South Africa -the right to legal representation • Found that the duty remains that of the State despite creation of Legal Aid Board Access to Justice

  12. Reasons for Increased Civil Legal Aid • Constitutional right to a fair civil trial  • Legal representation gives effect to transformative rights in our constitution  • Parliament has recognised the need and placed an obligation on the LAB to provide without funding  • Substantial public demand for civil legal aid  • Equitable and accessible justice system is necessary for sustainable development  • State may be increasingly sued to do so • There is a need for a coherent and affordable system for providing civil legal aid Access to Justice

  13. Delivery of Access to Justice • Legal Aid Board – 396 068 • Salaried Legal Practitioners • Judicare • Co-operation Partners • Impact Litigation • Para-legals Access to Justice

  14. Delivery of Access to Justice • Organised Legal Profession - ? Matters • Public Interest Departments • Pro Bono • Pro Amico • Pro Deo • In forma Pauperis • Contingency Fee (No win no fee) Access to Justice

  15. Delivery of Access to Justice • University Law Clinics – 18 000 matters • Services provided by student • Main purpose is practical training • Access to Justice Ancillary • NGO’s - ? matters • LRC • LHR • Pro Bono.org • Women’s Legal Centre Access to Justice

  16. Funding • State – R 700 million currently • Profession ? • Donors ? Access to Justice

  17. Lessons • Public Purposes Funds • Para-legals • Hong Kong – Civil Funding Model Access to Justice

  18. Innovations • Call Centres • Rural Links • Services for not so poor • Legal Insurance Access to Justice

  19. Conclusion As I mentioned at the start, Government or the Legal Aid Board cannot on their own ensure access to justice for all. It must be a combined effort and it is hoped that the all role players can plan together to ensure access to justice for all. Access to Justice

More Related