1 / 22

Summary: Measurements of Electron Cloud Effects K. Harkay ECLOUD07, Daegu, Korea, Apr 2007

Summary: Measurements of Electron Cloud Effects K. Harkay ECLOUD07, Daegu, Korea, Apr 2007.

darci
Download Presentation

Summary: Measurements of Electron Cloud Effects K. Harkay ECLOUD07, Daegu, Korea, Apr 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Summary: Measurements of Electron Cloud EffectsK. HarkayECLOUD07, Daegu, Korea, Apr 2007

  2. Comments represent my main impressions from the workshop – experimentalist’s perspectiveApologies in advance for not mentioning everyone’s excellent results I’d like to acknowledge the hard work of all the speakers at the workshop!Much thanks for discussions with and insights from C. Celata, S. Heifets, S. Kato, J. Flanagan, M. Furman, R. Macek, K. Ohmi, M. Pivi, L. Schachter, and many others

  3. Discussion topics • Novel experiments • Progress in cures/mitigation • Price to pay with cures (impedance) • max < 1 (!!!) • What do we need to pay more attention to? • Final thoughts

  4. Topics covered by the following talks: • R. Macek, Summary of e-p feedback mini-workshop • W. Fischer, Summary of ECL2 mini-workshop • S. Cousineau, E-p instab at SNS • J. Flanagan, EC and spec. lumi. at KEKB • W. Fischer, EC msmt at RHIC • R. Zwaska, EC at FNAL MI • A. Molvik, Msmnts EC with solenoid, quad magnetic transport • R. Macek, EC gen, trapping in quad at PSR • S. Casalbuoni, Pressure rise and beam heat load on cold chamber • M. Kireeff Covo, EC density msmnt at HCX • K.-I. Kanazawa, Msmnt EC density at KEKB • T. Ieiri, Msmnt EC wake effects at KEKB • S.-Y. Zhang, Proton emitt. growth at RHIC

  5. Topics covered by the following talks (cont): • F. LePimpec (M. Pivi), SEY msmnts at SLAC • S. Kato, SEY msmnts at KEKB • W. Fischer, Molecular desorption on SS from high energy ion beams • M. Pivi, ILC R&D in PEP2, SEY, grooved chambers • M. Nishiwaki, SEY msmnts coated and uncoated chambers

  6. Novel experiments to characterize EC • EC trapped in quads (R. Macek) • EC dynamics in solenoid/quad transport (A. Molvik) • EC density (M. Kireeff Covo, K.-I. Kanazawa) • EC wakefield (T. Ieiri, M. Palmer) • Parasitic single bunch studies at KEKB (J. Flanagan)

  7. EC trapped in quads • Studied electrons in quadrupoles using RFA and sweeping electrode (Macek et al.) • Ultralong EC lifetime, 2-3 orders magnitude longer (60-100 s) in quads than in drifts (~100ns) • Ejection into drift spaces due to EB • Drive out of quad (sweeper), see increase quad RFA; drift RFA decreases after a few turns • Electrostatic mirrors to control ejection • Multipactor 25x less in quads, signal 1.5 times higher; implies >35x more seed electrons in quads vs. drifts

  8. EC dynamics in solenoid/quad transport • HCX measures ions and electrons from all sources to characterize the EC and beam potential, data for benchmarking code (Molvik, Kireef Covo et al.) • Used RFAs, clearing electrodes, solenoid, GESD, to characterize EC • Varied clearing electrodes in solenoid and between solenoids (ring) to study control of trapping and to study effect of trapped electrons in heavy ion beam • New diagnostic: image light emitted by ion-induced desorbed gas

  9. EC density • KEKB experiments (Kanazawa) • Use RFA to select EC energy to select desired volume in chamber • Drift: High energy cutoff selects area with radius r centered on beam • Dipole: computed volume selected by RFA • Error sources: finite bunch length; resonantly trapped EC doesn’t reach wall (Schachter, Loiacono/Harkay (PAC05))

  10. EC density • HCX exp (Kireeff-Covo) • Configured RFA for ion selection or electron selection (4 grids that can be biased) • Used combination of RFA and clearing electrodes to deduce evolution of EC density in long ion beam pulse • Results likely insightful for long proton bunches, perhaps also to understand time scales of evolution of EC effects in PSR • Results may be applicable to short e+ bunches as well in regime when long bunch train acts like single long bunch

  11. EC wakefield • Bunch train, witness bunch study (Ieiri) • Detailed tune shift and tune spread study to characterize electron cloud density and lifetime • Good qualitative agreement with expectation • Detailed comparison with analytical EC wakefield to be done • Bunch train/witness bunch studies at CESR (Palmer) • Tune shift measurements comparing e+ and e- • EC overshoot for e- beam • Understanding is needed, simulations, etc

  12. Parasitic single bunch studies at KEKB • Machine study time almost nonexistent at HEP colliders • How to study electron clouds and instabilities? • Clever parasitic studies at KEKB (Flanagan et al.) • Drive bunch injected into operational pattern, study single bunch effects as EC, bunch current decays

  13. Progress in cures/mitigation • Control of SE emission from warm or cold surface, in drifts or magnetic fields • Criteria: drift- vs. dipole-dominated; primary (PE) vs. secondary (SE) electron dominated • Drifts: Coating (TiN, NEG) and solenoids • Bends: antechamber (PEP2) or grooves (LHC) to mitigate photoemission, conditioning (pre 2007, limited to max ~1.3 (SS) at SPS) • Wiggler: all of the above • SC undulator heating at ANKA: short bunch agrees with RW heating; long bunch NOT (possible evidence of EC) (Casalbuoni). See ECLOUD02/04 for CERN data on conditioning of cold surface.

  14. Cures/mitigation techniques of choice: present • NEG + bunch pattern: RHIC (Zhang, Fischer) • Surface roughness also reduces EC from beam loss • NEG also good for pumping desorbed gas? • Solenoid: KEKB • Do not use/need low maxcoatings – PE dominated? Chamber conditioning gives low max? • TiN+solenoid: PEP2, SNS (also clearing electrode at foil) • TiN not enough, also needs solenoids (Cu in straights) • Interesting to test maxconditioning with radiation/beam to see if as effective in PEP2 as KEKB results show – turn off solenoids (Heifets)

  15. Cures/mitigation techniques of choice: future • Antigrazing ridges • For photoelectrons (LHC) • Showers issue for collimator/beam loss application (Fischer, RHIC) • Grooves (rectangular/triangular (“fins”): for ILC DR (Pivi) • Considered “holy grail” to allow one e+ ring instead of two (shorter bunch spacing) (pre 2007) • PEP2 tests disappointing (rect. fins) • Clearing electrodes: high interest at CERN, elsewhere (Fischer, ECL2)

  16. Clearing electodes • Promising results from simulations • Many uncertainties in mechanical construction • Many questions of max and electrical conductivity of glass/enamel substrate • Looking forward to studies in machines • Fischer listed references back to 1970s on experience measuring and curing ion-induced gas desorption. Useful to have in-depth review of past experience using clearing electrodes.

  17. Price to pay for mitigation techniques • Impedance/HOMs • Electrodes (0.5 /m  km = large (Pivi)) • Grooves (adds 30% in case of ILC DR (Bane)) • Glass/Enamel coatings • Percent of circumference that needs coverage for effect? (see past experience at, e.g. ISR, PSR, etc) • Mechanical complexity/cost • How to repair if damaged (vent chamber!) • But…

  18. Biggest surprises of workshop (to me) • max < 1 for conditioned surfaces (LePimpec, Pivi, Kato, Nishiwaka) • Strong recontamination effects not observed at KEK (compared to SLAC) • Let’s not forget that grazing incidence max is higher, and higher energy part can be enhanced • Grooves result (Pivi) • Photoelectrons can dominate in wigglers (Celata, ECL2)

  19. What do we need to pay more attention to? • PE dominate after SEs cured (i.e. after max < 1) • Photoelectron mitigation? How to lower reflectivity? • Maybe we can benefit from high-brightness photocathode electron gun community to better understand emission process • Can other PEs dominate? • How does quad-trapped EC interact with beam? • Studies of EC dynamics in quads in short-bunch e+ rings: same phenomenon as PSR? • Transition crossing, bunch length effects (RHIC, FNAL MI) • Electron-ion (background) interaction; virtual “cathode” at wall (Furman)

  20. Final thoughts • It would be interesting if someone critically reviewed clearing electrode experience in depth (ion/EC clearing) • It would be interesting if someone summarized EC density thresholds for different instability effects at different machines and relate to machine and surface parameters • Need to model multiple elements (quads, ejection, wiggler) rather than one at a time (Macek et al) • Future opportunities for machine studies: CesrTA, BEPC2 K. Harkay ECLOUD07 Daegu, Korea, Apr 2007

  21. Final thoughts • Cloud density: definition, need to be specific • Long p+ bunch, line density • Short e+ bunch, avg volume density, whole cross section vs. only within radius r • Bombardment rate unit – C/cm2 proposed by Furman • Other useful figures-of-merit? Beam neutralization?

  22. Final thoughts – x vs. y • Monday’s discussion: • X-y coupling; horizontal modulations may drive EC into vertical plane; may be important in colliders. Think about pumping EC out of collider interaction region (longitudinal potential well) (Heifets) • Trapping elsewhere? (Macek) grad. B vs. EB drift • Resonance effects in periodic lattice? (Celata) • E-p FB (Macek) • only 15-30% improvement in threshold • 2nd growth phase observed: EC in gap? • Appearance of H instab at PSR and SNS

More Related