1 / 12

LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE: LOS ANGELES LEADERS IN EDUCATION PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE: LOS ANGELES LEADERS IN EDUCATION PRELIMINARY FINDINGS. Fernando J. Guerra  Brianne Gilbert  Melissa Woehrstein The Thomas and Dorothy Leavey Center for the Study of Los Angeles Loyola Marymount University. BACKGROUND. Leadership Initiative:

Download Presentation

LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE: LOS ANGELES LEADERS IN EDUCATION PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE:LOS ANGELES LEADERS IN EDUCATIONPRELIMINARY FINDINGS Fernando J. Guerra  Brianne Gilbert  Melissa Woehrstein The Thomas and Dorothy Leavey Center for the Study of Los Angeles Loyola Marymount University

  2. BACKGROUND • Leadership Initiative: • Identify, survey and report the opinions and attitudes of 100 leaders in 10 different sectors: • Culminating in the analysis of the top 1000 leaders in the Los Angeles region.

  3. METHODOLOGY • 2010 Leadership Initiative – Los Angeles Leaders in Education • Surveyed educational leaders who impact policy, practice, advocacy and/or research. • Only leaders who had responded as of the reporting date were included in this report (as of 3/21/10, 74 leaders participated).

  4. DEMOGRAPHICS • Gender: 39% Male; 61% Female • Highest Level of Education: 88% of respondents reported having a Graduate/Professional degree* • Racial/Ethnic Origin: 47% White/Anglo; 31% Latino/Hispanic; 13% African American/Black; 6% Asian/Pacific Islander; and 3% Other • Residency: Over 95% of respondents live in Los Angeles County; and of those respondents, 70% have lived in Los Angeles for 16 years or more *Findings only include the most frequent response

  5. IDEOLOGICAL BELIEFS

  6. QUALITY OF EDUCATION • 91% of respondents stated that the K-12 public education system was in need of major changes. *Chart indicates the number of leaders who chose a particular response; N=69

  7. LAUSD • When rating the quality of education at a local and state level, an overwhelming majority of respondents said LAUSD was of poor quality (69%), compared to the 36% of respondents who said California’s public schools were of poor quality. *Chart indicates the number of leaders who chose a particular response; N=69 *Chart indicates the number of leaders who chose a particular response; N=68

  8. ADMINISTRATION • While 80% of leaders approve of the way President Obama is handling education policy, 86% disapprove of the way Governor Schwarzenegger is handling the state’s K-12 public education system. N=65 N=64

  9. ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLING • 2/3 of respondents opposed the use of school vouchers to pay for a portion of the cost to send children to private schools – even if it would take some portion of money away from public schools *Chart indicates the number of leaders who chose a particular response; N=65

  10. ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLING • Over 2/3 of respondents believe that Pilot schools are an effective approach to education reform in Los Angeles N=63

  11. EDUCATIONAL REFORM • An overwhelming majority of respondents (88%) agreed that high school students should pass a minimum competency or proficiency test in order to receive a high school diploma. N=66

  12. FOR MORE INFORMATION • Final results will be available Summer 2010 • Contact the Leavey Center to request your copy (www.lmu.edu/csla) • Questions: Brianne Gilbert, Senior Research Associate • 310-338-1779; brianne.gilbert@lmu.edu

More Related