1 / 19

Number-Theoretic Aspects of Matter Agglomeration/Aggregation Modelling in Dimension d

Number-Theoretic Aspects of Matter Agglomeration/Aggregation Modelling in Dimension d. Adam Gadomski Institute of Mathematics and Physi cs U. T . A . Bydgoszcz, Poland in cooperation with: M arcel Ausloos SUPRATECS University of Lièg e, Liège, Belgium. Verhulst’200

tocho
Download Presentation

Number-Theoretic Aspects of Matter Agglomeration/Aggregation Modelling in Dimension d

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Number-Theoretic Aspects of Matter Agglomeration/Aggregation Modelling in Dimension d Adam Gadomski Institute of Mathematics and Physics U.T.A. Bydgoszcz, Poland in cooperation with: Marcel Ausloos SUPRATECS University of Liège, Liège, Belgium Verhulst’200 16-18 September 2004, Royal Military Academy, Brussels, Belgium

  2. OBJECTIVE: TO REVEAL NUMBER-THEORETIC ASPECTS OF ADVANCED STAGES OF A MODEL CLUSTER-CLUSTER AGGREGATION WITH STRESS-STRAIN FIELDS INVOLVED, EXAMINED IN A MESOSCOPIC SCALE, AND LEADING TO A PHASE SEPARATION HIGH TEMPERATURE EFFECT Verhulst’200

  3. A PHENOMENOLOGY BASED UPON A HALL-PETCH LIKE CONJECTURE FOR CLUSTER-CLUSTER LATE-TIME AGGREGATION ACCOMPANIED BY STRAIN-STRESS FIELDS Verhulst’200 - internal stress accumulated in the inter-cluster spaces • average cluster radius, to be inferred from the growth model; a possible extension, with a q, like

  4. Verhulst’200 Remark1: WE MAY HAVE AT LEAST MOLECULAR CHAOS... TWO-PHASE ENTROPIC SYSTEM Model cluster-cluster aggregation of one-phase molecules, forming a cluster, in a second phase (solution): (A) An early growing stage – some single cluster (with a double layer) is formed;(B) A later growing stage – many more clusters are formed

  5. Verhulst’200 Dense Merging (left) vs Undense Merging (right) (see, Meakin & Skjeltorp, Adv. Phys. 42, 1 (1993), for colloids) TYPICAL CLUSTER-MERGING (3 GRAINS) MECHANISMS:

  6. RESULTING 2D-MICROSTRUCTURE IN TERMS OF DIRICHLET-VORONOI MOSAIC REPRESENTATION (for model colloids – Earnshow & Robinson, PRL 72, 3682 (1994)): Remark2: Depletion zones in case B can be expected Verhulst’200 INITIAL STRUCTURE FINAL STRUCTURE

  7. Verhulst’200„Two-grain” model: a link between growth&relaxation „Two-grain” spring-and-dashpot Maxwell-like model with (un)tight piston: a quasi-fractional viscoelastic element, see A.G., J.M. Rubi, J. Luczka, M.A., submitted to Chem,. Phys. Remark3: Untight = competiotion and loss

  8. THE GROWTH MODEL COMES FROM MNET (Mesoscopic Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics, Vilar & Rubi, PNAS 98, 11091 (2001)): a flux of matter specified in the space of cluster sizes Verhulst’200 surface - to - volume characteristic exponent diffusion term drift term - hypervolume of a single cluster (state variable) • independent parameters (temperature and diffusion constant) • <-Note: cluster surface is crucial! scaling: holds !

  9. GIBBS EQUATION OF ENTROPY VARIATION AND THE FORM OF DERIVED POTENTIALS AS ‘STARTING FUNDAMENTALS’ OF CLUSTER-CLUSTER LATE-TIME AGGREGATION Verhulst’200 • state variable and time dependent chemical • potential • denotes variations of entropyS and • (i) Potential for dense micro-aggregation (curvature-driven growth in a competing manner: „the smaller the worse”): • (ii) Potential for undense micro-aggregation:

  10. Verhulst’200 Local conservation law and IBCs divergence operator no additional sources Remark5: typical BCs prescribed but abnormalies may occur... Local conservation law: IBCs (Remark4: ICs OF ANOMALOUS TYPE MAY CAUSE PROBLEMS!?):

  11. Verhulst’200 where TAKEN MOST FREQUENTLY(see, discussion in: A. Gadomski et al. Physica A 325, 284 (2003)) FOR THE MODELING AFTER SOLVING THE STATISTICAL PROBLEM IS OBTAINED USEFUL PHYSICAL QUANTITIES:

  12. Verhulst’200 REDUCED VARIANCES AS MEASURES OF HYPERVOLUME FLUCTUATIONS specific volume fluctuations the exponent reads: space dimension over space superdimension the exponent reads: one over superdimension (cluster-radius fluctuations) Dense merging of clusters: Undense merging of clusters:

  13. An important fluctuational regime of d-DIMENSIONAL MATTER AGGREGATION COUPLED TO STRESS RELAXATION FIELD – a metastable regime Verhulst’200 Hall-Petch stress-involved contribution fluctuational growth mode

  14. Verhulst’200 AT WHICH BASIC GROWTH RULE DO WE ARRIVE ? HOW DO THE INTERNAL STRESS RELAX ? Answer:We anticipate appearence of power laws. It builds Bethe latt. in 3-2 mode - d-dependent quantity Remark6: Bethe-lattice (odd-number based generator): a signature of mean-field approximation for the relaxation and a mark of deterministic chaos? - a relaxation exponent based on the above

  15. Verhulst’200 Bethe lattice, a signature of structural irregularity

  16. Verhulst’200 ABOUT A ROLE OF MEAN HARMONICITY: TOWARD A ‘PRIMITIVE’ BETHE LATTICE GENERATION (model colloids)? Remark7: Mean harmonicity means order coming from disorder They both obey MEAN HARMONICITY [M.H.] rule, indicating, that the case d=2 is the most effective !!! CONCLUSION: Matter aggregation (in its late stage) and mechanical relaxation are also coupled linearly by their characteristic exponents ...

  17. Verhulst’200 Problem looks dimensionality dependent(superdimension!): Any reasonable characteristics is going to have (d+1) – account in its exponent’s value, see A.G., J.M. Rubi, Chem. Phys. 293, 169 (2003). Remark8:Is this a signature of existence of RCP (randomly close-packed) phases (see, Remark 7)? CONCEPT of Random Space – Filling Systems* * R.Zallen, The Physics of Amorphous Solids, Wiley, NY,1983

  18. Verhulst’200 CONCLUSIONS • THE MODEL IS GOVERNED BY SPACE DIMENSION d AND TEMPERATURE T; • THE MOST INTRIGUING THINGS HAPPEN IN SUFFICIENTLY HIGH T LIMIT; • THOUGH THE GROWTH EXPONENT REMAINS AS FOR LOW T CASE, THE GROWTH TEMPO IS BETTER OPTIMISED – IT LEADS TO MEAN HARMONICITY RULE! THE CASE OF d=2 IS THE MOST EFFICIENT; • THE STRESS RELAXATION SPEED IS ALSO WELL OPTIMISED IN HIGH T LIMIT, AND BECAUSE OF HALL-PETCH CONJECTURE, MEAN HARMONICITY RULE APPEARS AGAIN, AND A BETHE LATTICE GENERATOR ARISES; • THE RELAXATION EXPONENT IS A HALF OF THE GROWTH EXPONENT WHEN EXACTLY THE HALL-PETCH CONJECTURE IS APPLIED; • BOTH EXPONENTS BEAR A „NUMERIC” SIGNATURE OF CLOSE-PACKING, NAMELY A (d+1)-ACCOUNT, SEEN ALSO IN GROWTH & RELAXATION EXPONENTS; • ALL THE SCENARIO DESCRIBED LEADS TO AN OPTIMAL PHASE-SEPARATING BEHAVIOR, WITH AN ‘EARLY SIGNATURE’ OF FIBONACCI NUMBERING COMING FROM SCALING A SPACE DIMENSION DEPENDENT PREFACTOR OF THE STATE VARIABLE DEPENDENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT

  19. FINALE (especially, for Verhulst’200 ?):A HIGH T AND d DEPENDENT PHASE SEPARATION EFFECT WOULD BE SEEN AS A MANIFESTATION OF A METASTABLE CHAOTIC BEHAVIOR IN SPACE (THE CLUSTERS GET SLIGHTLY APART!) BUT THE PROCESS GOES MORE SMOOTHLY AND IN A MORE ORDERED MANNER IN TIME THAN ITS LOW T, CLUSTER CURVATURE DRIVEN & READILY SPACE-FILLING (STABLE) COUNTERPART !!! A.G. thanks  COST P10 (Prof. P. Richmond) for financial support.

More Related