Chapter 6: The Bill of Rights - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

social science n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Chapter 6: The Bill of Rights PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Chapter 6: The Bill of Rights

play fullscreen
1 / 10
Chapter 6: The Bill of Rights
164 Views
Download Presentation
sora
Download Presentation

Chapter 6: The Bill of Rights

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Social Science Chapter 6: The Bill of Rights

  2. The addition of the Bill of Rights, or a list of citizen’s rights,to the Constitution was the first test of the amendment process, or the way in which changes are added to the Constitution • The amendment process is as follows: • An amendment is approved at a national level through a two-thirds vote from the Senate and House • The same amendment is then proposed by either Congress or a national convention, or assembly • The states, after being presented the amendment, can either ratify the amendment through three-fourths vote from each state, or by approval by a special convention in three fourths of all states The amendment process

  3. Madison declared that making a bill of rights would make the Constitution better and stronger • The Bill of Rights is constructed similar to the Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights, and actually takes pieces from both documents, along with colonial and state charters • Members of Congress voted to attach the Bill of Rights at the end of the Constitution, and all amendments but two were ratified in 1791 • The two that weren’t were to enlarge the House and to limit when Congress could increase its salaries Adding the bill of rights

  4. The first main category of the Bill of Rights is the protection of individual freedoms, and is broken up into five parts • Freedom of religion: establishes freedom to practice any religion desired and the separation between church and state, or the situation in which the government may not favor any religion or establish an official religion • Freedom of speech: establishes the freedom to speak and write freely • Freedom of the press: establishes the right for the press to criticize the government without being jailed • Freedom of assembly: establishes the right to gather together in demonstration • Freedom of Petition: establishes the right to ask a government representative to change a law, make a new law, or solve problems that arise Protection of individual freedoms

  5. The second category of the Bill of Rights is the protection of the citizens against abuse of power from the government, and is broken up into four parts • Gun ownership: citizens have the right to own guns • At time of writing, militias, or volunteer soldiers, existed, so debate over this amendment still goes on • Housing of soldiers: government must obtain homeowner’s consent first before housing soldiers • Unreasonable searches and seizures: police must obtain a search warrant from a judge before entering a citizen’s home or going through a citizen’s property • Protecting Property Rights: the government has the right of eminent domain, or taking private property for public use • Government must pay owners fair price for their property first Protection against abuse of power

  6. The third category in the Bill of Rights is the protection against the accused, that citizens are entitled to due process of law, or a process by which the government must treat accused persons fairly according to rules established by the law, and is broken down into three parts • The Fifth Amendment: nobody may be forced to answer questions that can go against themselves in court, that those who are accused of serious crimes must be indicted by a grand jury first, and citizens are protected from double jeopardy, or being tried for the same crime twice Protection against the accused

  7. Right to Trial by Jury: a citizen has the right to a speedy, public, and fair trial in front of a jury of their peers, has the right to advice from a lawyer, has the right to know what they are being tried for, can ask questions to witnesses against them • Bails, Fines, and Punishments: protects the accused from unfair treatment before and after a trial, the accused can be allowed to make bail, or pay a deposit to the court to go free, the bail must not be unreasonably high, and protects the accused from cruel and unusual punishment • Distribution of powers: powers of the nation belong to either the state government or the people Protection against the accused

  8. The original Bill of Rights were constructed with loose interpretations in order for them to apply to several situations It is the job of our nation’s courts to interpret the Bill of Rights and use their legal expertise to rule if an individual’s rights are being violated We will now examine two case studies, or descriptions of situations or conflicts, the issues involved, and the decisions made, in order to better understand the role of the courts Interpreting the bill of rights

  9. Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt were teenagers in 1965 when they decided to wear armbands to protest American involvement in the Vietnam War • They were suspended from school when they entered wearing the armbands • The parents of Tinker and Eckhardt argued that they did not disrupt school or interfered with the student’s rights, and the they had the right to protest, protected by the First Amendment, while the school argued the suspensions were for disciplinary reasons and that school was not a place for protest • The case went to the Supreme Court, where the justices ruled in favor of the Tinker and Eckhardt Tinker & eckhardtv. United States

  10. The American Nazi Party wanted to march through Skokie, Illinois, where many Jewish survivors of the Holocaust lived • The town demanded that in order to march, the party had to put down $350,000 for insurance • The party tried to protest, but the town forbade them to do so • The case proved difficult to interpret • One side stated that since the Nazis would destroy the right to speak if they were in power, why should they have this right • The other side stated that if the United States forbade the Nazis to organize, they would have the power to do it again • In the end, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Nazis, saying that the insurance was too high for them to pay, and that they could organize, march, and wear their uniforms American Nazi Party v. United States