1 / 24

Evolution of isolated neutron stars and ideas for GCRT J 1745–3009

Evolution of isolated neutron stars and ideas for GCRT J 1745–3009. Sergei Popov (SAI). Magnetic rotator.

osric
Download Presentation

Evolution of isolated neutron stars and ideas for GCRT J 1745–3009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evolution of isolated neutron stars and ideasfor GCRT J1745–3009 Sergei Popov (SAI)

  2. Magnetic rotator Observational appearances of NSs(if we are not speaking about cooling)are mainly determined by P, Pdot, V, B,(also, probably by the inclination angle χ),and properties of the surrounding medium. B is not evolving significantly in most cases,so it is important to discuss spin evolution. Together with changes in B (and χ) one can speak about magneto-rotational evolution We are going to discuss the main stagesof this evolution, namely: Ejector, Propeller, Accretor, and Georotatorfollowing the classification by Lipunov

  3. Magneto-rotational evolution of radio pulsars For radio pulsar magneto-rotationalevolution is usually illustrated in theP-Pdot diagram. However, we are interested alsoin the evolution after this stage. Spin-down. Rotational energy is released. The exact mechanism is still unknown.

  4. Mdot/μ2 Evolution of neutron stars: rotation + magnetic field Ejector → Propeller → Accretor → Georotator 1 – spin down 2 – passage through a molecular cloud 3 – magnetic field decay [astro-ph/0101031] See the book by Lipunov (1987, 1992)

  5. The new zoo of neutron stars • During last>10 years • it became clear that neutron stars • can be born very different. • In particular, absolutely • non-similar to the Crab pulsar. • Compact central X-ray sources • in supernova remnants. • Anomalous X-ray pulsars • Soft gamma repeaters • The Magnificent Seven • Unidentified EGRET sources • Transient radio sources (RRATs) • Calvera …. More interesting sources are hopefully coming. Can we also search for exotic NSs amongknown peculiar sources???? [see some brief review in astro-ph/0610593]

  6. GCRT J1745–3009 GCRT J1745–3009 is located at right ascension 17 h 45 min 50.8 s, declination -30° 09' 52" 10", indicated by the small box below the 20'-diameter shell of the supernova remnant, SNR 359.1–00.5. Other sources in the image include the sources to the west which are part of Sagittarius E, the linear feature, 'The Snake', to the north, and 'The Mouse' to the northeast of GCRT J1745–3009. Discovered by Hyman et al. Nature 434, 50-52(3 March 2005) See a recent review in Ray et al. arXiv: 0808.1899

  7. Bursts • Altogether 7 bursts detected. • 5 bursts in 2002. VLA 330 MHz Duration of each ~ 10 minutes Flux ~ 1Jy • Periodicity ~ 77 minutes Between bursts limit <75 mJy • a burst in 2003. GMRT 330 MHz The maximum was not detected. • Probably the burst is similar to 2002 bursts • a burst in 2004 • GMRT 330 MHz • Different from earlier. Weaker ~0.05 Jy Shorter ~2 minutes (Hyman et al. 2007) Duty cycle <7% (~ 120 hours of observations altogether)

  8. Proposed modelsto explain the source • Near-by objects (brown dwarf, low-mass star, exoplanet,...). Hyman et al. (2005) • Nulling pulsar. Kulkarni, Phinney (2005) • Double pulsar. Turolla et al. (2005) • Transient white dwarf pulsar. Zhang, Gil (2005) • Precessing pulsar. Zhu, Xu (2005) If the source is at the Galactic center, then the total energyrelease in a flare is about 1034 erg/s. Here we discuss a set of possibilities related to less eplored stages ofisolated and accreting neutron stars: Propellers, Superejectors, mixed phases for isolated neutron stars,pulsar wind caverns in binaries, ....

  9. Schwarzshild radii istypicall unimportant. Critical radii -I Transitions between different evolutionary stages can be treated in terms of critical radii • Ejector stage. Radius of the light cylinder. Rl=c/ω. Shvartsman radius. Rsh. • Propeller stage. Corotation radius. Rc • Accretor stage. Magnetospheric (Alfven) radius. RA • Georotator stage. Magnetospheric (Alfven) radius. RA As observational appearence is related to interaction with the surrounding medium the radius of gravitational captureis always important: RG=2GM/V2.

  10. Critical radii-II • The Shvartsman radius • It is determined by relativistic particles wind 2. Corotation radius 3. Alfven radius

  11. Pressure We can define a stopping radiusRst, at which external and internalpressures are equal. The stage is determined byrelation of this radius toother critial radii.

  12. Classification

  13. Ejector Propeller

  14. Accretor Georotator

  15. Isolated magnetar In this set of models ~77-min period is the spin period of a magnetar. Such long periods are possible due to spin-down in a presence of a disc(see the arguments in de Luca et al. 2006 in relation to RCW103). Here we propose several configurations in which a region of openedfield lines is formed, however, a NS already evolved off the Ejector stage.

  16. Rl Rl Magnetotail of a magnetar Think about a mixturebetween Georotatorand Ejector stages If the tail goesbeyond the lightcylinder, then wehave a region ofopened field lines.

  17. Rl V Ω Rl Opened lines Magnetowings of a magnetar For a different orientation of the spin, magnetic dipole and velocity vectorswe can have a different configuration with open field lines.

  18. Reconnection in a magnetotail of a magnetar This situation was numericaly studied in some detailes by Toropina et al. (2001)with a set of computer models. Main properties of the magnetotail for different parameters have been obtained. Energy in the tail Energy release rate in a single flare in the case of a low density tail

  19. Transient propeller If cooling is efficient enough, then it is possibleto form an envelope around a NS at the stageof Propeller. The envelope grows in mass and contract tillit reaches the corotation radius, then it collapsesto a NS, there is a flash and ejection is possible.(see, for example, Lipunov 1992)

  20. SuperEjector Roche lobe overflow + Fast radio pulsar “Super” stands for superEddington accretion rate. A cavern is formed around a pulsarbecause of strong wind of relativisticparticles and stron flux ofelectro-magnetic waves. Quasiperiodically this cavern should blow.So, a radio burst can be detected.

  21. Pulsating cavern Without a Roche lobe overflowa cavern still can be formedin a strong stellar winds of amassive companion. Again, quasiperiodically thiscavern can pulsate becase ofaccumulation of energy inside it. [Lipunov et al.] It is possible to fit 77-minute interval between bursts playing with parametersof a binary system.

  22. Floating cavern RSH<RG When a cavern reaches RG it “sails away”or part of a cavern separates and flow away. Duration of a burst Interval between bursts

  23. Populational aspects It seems that GCRT J1745-3009 is the only source of this kind in the direction towards the galactic center (in a region about few sq. degree). If the source is close-by then we can expect to see more at low fluxes. So we conclude, that the source is at a distance ~8 kpc. Then we can estimate the number of such sources in the Galaxy. The region covered by the survey contains about 1 % (or slightly less)of the galactic stellar population. The number appears to be ~100-1000.

  24. An intermediate stage for magnetars? If there are 100-1000 sources in the Galaxy, and every NS passes through such a stage,then duration is ~103-104 yrs. This is too small. Then we can consider that just part of NScan appear as sources of this kind. If we consider magnetars as potential sources,then the duration is up to 105 yrs. Such a time scale is consistent with anintermediate stage of a magnetar: a propeller or a similar stage.

More Related