1 / 35

STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013

HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013. September 10, 2013. Components of the 2013 Standardized Testing and Reporting Program (STAR). California Standards Test (CST) English/Language Arts, Grades 2 - 8 Writing, Grades 4 and 7

nigel-horn
Download Presentation

STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013

  2. Components of the 2013 Standardized Testing and Reporting Program (STAR) • California Standards Test (CST) • English/Language Arts, Grades 2 - 8 • Writing, Grades 4 and 7 • Mathematics, Grades 2 - 7 • General Mathematics, Grade 8 • Algebra, Grades 7 and 8 • Geometry, Grade 8 • Science, Grades 5 and 8 • History/Social Science, Grade 8 • California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) • California Modified Assessment (CMA) • Standards-based Tests in Spanish (STS) 2

  3. CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST) ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTS 2013 Percentages of Students Meeting Proficiency 81% Average for HBCSD

  4. CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST) MATHEMATICS 2013 Percentages of Students Meeting Proficiency 80% Average for HBCSD Grades 2 - 8

  5. CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST) ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTS 2009-2013 Subgroup Results State Results: 33% Students with Disability 45% Economically Disadvantaged 22% English Learners

  6. CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST) MATHEMATICS 2009-2013 Subgroup Results State Results: 48% Students with Disabilities 53% Economically Disadvantaged 40% English Learners

  7. CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST) 8th GRADE HISTORY-SOCIAL SCIENCE AND 5th and 8th GRADE SCIENCE RESULTS

  8. STAR WRITING ASSESSMENT 4th and 7th Graders Meeting Proficiency * The State suspended the writing assessment for 4th Grade in 2010

  9. Additional State and Federal Accountability Components • Physical Fitness Test (PFT) 9

  10. Physical Fitness Testing (PFT) Percentages of Students Meeting Standards 2009 - 2013 2006/07: 6 out of 6 = Meets Fitness Standards 2008/09 – 2012/13: 5 out of 6 AND 6 out of 6 = Meets Fitness Standards. = 40% were at 6 out of 6 in 5th grade and 53% were 6 out of 6 in 7th grade

  11. Additional State and Federal Accountability Components • California English Language Development (CELDT) • Title III Accountability for English Learners(EL) Data is not available from the California Department of Education at this time and will be presented at a future meeting. 11

  12. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) • Federal accountability reporting system • Looks at the percentage of students meeting proficiency • STAR CST, CMA, and CAPA tests used to determine whether a district/school has met their AYP • Criteria for meeting AYP • Participation rate of 95% • Percent proficient • Additional API Indicator (800 or more) • Criteria must be met for students districtwide/schoolwide as well as significant subgroups

  13. ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTS Proficient and Advanced • 80% 81%  79%   77%  75%  71%  70%  69%  65%   60%  59% 54% HB Districtwide

  14. ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTS 2009-2013 Subgroup Results 2010/11 AMO = 67.6% 2001/02–2003/04 AMO = 13.6% 2008/09 AMO = 46.0% 2011/12 AMO = 78.4% 2009/10 AMO = 56.8% 2012/13 AMO = 89.2%

  15. ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) ELA Achievement Gap – Subgroups Compared to AYP Targets and All Students

  16. 79%  76%  75%   75%  75%  70%  70%  69%  65%  64%  59%  53% HB Districtwide

  17. ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) MATH 2009-2013 Subgroup Results 2001/02-2003/04 AMO = 16.0% 2008/09 AMO = 47.5% 2009/10 AMO = 58.0% 2010/11 AMO = 68.5% 2011/12 /AMO = 79.0% 2012/13 /AMO = 89.5%

  18. ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) Math Achievement Gap – Subgroups Compared to AYP Targets and All Students

  19. Huntington Beach City School District2013 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Summary

  20. Academic Performance Index (API) • State accountability reporting system • Looks at growth in district/school’s performance • Star CST, CMA, and CAPA tests used in API calculation

  21. Huntington Beach City School DistrictGrowth Academic Performance Index Results

  22. Eader Elementary SchoolGrowth Academic Performance Index Results

  23. Hawes Elementary SchoolGrowth Academic Performance Index Results

  24. Huntington Seacliff Elementary SchoolGrowth Academic Performance Index Results

  25. Moffett Elementary SchoolGrowth Academic Performance Index Results

  26. Perry Elementary SchoolGrowth Academic Performance Index Results

  27. Peterson Elementary SchoolGrowth Academic Performance Index Results

  28. Smith Elementary SchoolGrowth Academic Performance Index Results

  29. Dwyer Middle SchoolGrowth Academic Performance Index Results

  30. Sowers Middle SchoolGrowth Academic Performance Index Results

  31. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) Multi-Year Growth Trend 1999/00 2012/13 Overall School Site Baseline Results Growth Dwyer 732 895 163 Eader 781 932 151 Hawes 846 940 94 Huntington Seacliff 844* 968 124 Moffett 793 921 128 Perry 621 812 191 Peterson 757 937 180 Smith 794 910 116 Sowers 807 892 85 *2000 Baseline

  32. HBCSD POINTS OF PRIDE • Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) • One (1) school met all AYP criteria • One (1) Title I school met goals through Safe Harbor • Twenty-Seven (27) groups made Safe Harbor goals • HBCSD students continue to outperform when compared to county and state data • Academic Performance Index (API) • All schools at or above the State Target of 800 • Seven (7) schools made growth • Six (6) schools over 900 • Positive multi-year growth trend for schools ranging from 85-191 points

  33. Program Improvement (PI) • HBCSD Responsibilities • Program Improvement (PI) • Year 1 designation for Peterson • Year 2 designation for District, Dwyer, and Perry • Continued data analysis and implementation of addendum to Local Education Agency (LEA) Plan • Set aside Title I funding for professional development, choice transfers, and supplemental educational services (Year 2 sites only)

  34. Huntington Beach City School District Next Steps for Success: • Continue to conduct data analysis on 2012/13 STAR and Multiple Measures assessment data • Identify and support student achievement needs based on data analysis • Develop and implement targeted academic interventions for students at each school site • Continue to align Single Plans for Student Achievement to reflect identified needs and goals in English-language arts and Mathematics 34

  35. Huntington Beach City School District Next Steps for Success (continued): • Support the continuation of the Benchmark Assessment System to inform instruction and monitor student achievement in English-language arts and Mathematics • Provide Common Core professional development for staff to support instructional goals for student achievement • Take steps to prepare for rigorous assessments in Spring of 2014 • Emphasis during instruction on 21st Century skills 35

More Related