1 / 15

2011 Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report

2011 Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report. September 6, 2011. Accountability Progress Report (APR) – Executive Summary.

shamus
Download Presentation

2011 Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2011 Lodi Unified School DistrictAccountability Progress Report September 6, 2011

  2. Accountability Progress Report (APR) – Executive Summary The primary assessments that determine school and district success in meeting State Academic Progress Index (API) and Federal Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) accountability requirements are the STAR and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) assessments. Focus Areas for 2011-12, including Algebra II and Chemistry

  3. Accountability Progress Report – Executive Summary Differences Between API and AYP • API results focus on how much schools are improving academically from year-to-year. • Results are reported using scores ranging from 200 to 1000. • California’s expectation is that every school will annually make-up at least 5% of the difference between their base API and the statewide performance target of 800. • AYP results focus on school performance, regardless of growth or baseline data. • Results are reported in terms of the: • Participation rate for English Language Arts and Mathematics • Annual Measureable Objective (AMO) - percent proficient in English Language Arts and Mathematics • API as an other indicator • Graduation rate as an other indicator

  4. Accountability Progress Report – Executive Summary Highlights • STAR achievements include: • Increasing the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards for the fourth consecutive year in: • Grade level English Language Arts, Math, Science, and History / Social Science • World History • CAHSEE achievements include: • A total of 81% of LUSD Grade 10 students passing the English Language Arts and Math sub-tests of the CAHSEE on their first attempt, representing: • The third year in a row that there was an increase in the percent of LUSD students passing the English Language Arts sub-test. • A three (3) percentage point increase from 2010 for Math sub-test. • API achievements include: • 10 schools reaching the state’s goal of 800 • 20 district schools making significant gains during the current reporting cycle • Eight (8) school making significant gains in current and previous reporting cycles. • AYP achievement include: • Six (6) schools, including one (1) Title I Program Improvement school (Needham), meeting 100% of their AYP criteria, and • A total of 13 other schools, including six other (6) Title I schools, meeting at least 80% of their AYP criteria.

  5. APR Primary Assessment – STAR/CST Overview • From 2010 to 2011, the percent of students meeting or exceeding English Language Arts and Math standards increased for each of these numerically significant student groups: • African American • American IndianFilipino • Hispanic or Latino • White • English Learner • Socioeconomically Disadvantaged • Student with Disabilities

  6. Academic Performance Index (API) – Overview • LUSD’s 2011 Growth API was 749, representing an increase of 12 points compared to the 2010 Base API of 737; California’s API was 778, representing an increase of 10 points. • 29 district schools met their school-wide API targets • 12 of these schools met all of their subgroup API targets • Nine of the district’s ten 800+ schools from last year maintained an 800+ ranking. • One additional school achieved the 800 mark.

  7. Academic Performance Index (API) – Overview • Twenty (20) of the district’s schools achieved significant growth during the recent API reporting cycle*, including nine (9) of the district’s thirteen Title 1 schools: • Three (3) schools showed gains of 40+ points • 10 schools showed gains of 20 – 39 points • Seven (7) schools showed gains of 10 – 19 points

  8. Academic Performance Index (API) – Overview • Eight (8) of the district’s schools achieved significant growth of at least 10 points during the recent and previous API reporting cycles including four (4) of the district’s thirteen Title 1 schools: • Needham 2009-10 cycle +35, 2010-11 cycle +48 (83 points combined) • Live Oak 2009-10 cycle +12, 2010-11 cycle +49 (61 points combined) • Podesta Ranch 2009-10 cycle +24, 2010-11 cycle +25 (49 points combined) • Sutherland 2009-10 cycle +28, 2010-11 cycle +21 (49 points combined) • Bear Creek 2009-10 cycle +21, 2010-11 cycle +23 (44 points combined) • Lodi High 2009-10 cycle +18, 2010-11 cycle +22 (40 points combined) • Lawrence 2009-10 cycle +21, 2010-11 cycle +18 (39 points combined) • Lodi Middle 2009-10 cycle +13, 2010-11 cycle +15 (28 points combined)

  9. API – 800+ Schools by Year Number of LUSD Schools at 800+ API: 2011 = 102010 = 102009 = 10

  10. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) – Overview • LUSD made positive API growth and positive growth in AYP/English Language Arts and AYP/Math for the seventh consecutive year. • A total of 47.8% of the students in LUSD performed at or above the Proficient level in English Language Arts; the 2011 AYP target was 67.0%. • A total of 50.5% of the students in LUSD performed at or above the Proficient level in Math; the 2011 AYP target was 67.3%. • Six (6) schools, including one (1) Title I Program Improvement school (Needham), met 100% of their AYP criteria; another 13 schools, including six (6) Title I schools, met at least 80% of their AYP criteria. *Per the CDE exclusionary rules, AYP proficiency calculations only include grade 2-8 Standardized Testing and Reporting program and grade 10 California High School Exit Exam results, and excludes results for students who enrolled after the first week of October and for English Learner students enrolled for less than 12 months.

  11. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) – District Targets *See Safe Harbor slide

  12. Adequate Yearly Progress – Executive Summary • Safe Harbor is a method of meeting the Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) by reducing the percentage of not proficient students.

  13. Appendix A: Glossary of Terms • AMO – Annual Measurable Objective • API – Academic Performance Index • APR – Accountability Progress Report • AYP – Adequate Yearly Progress • CAHSEE – California High School Exit Exam • CAPA – California Alternate Performance Assessment • CMA – California Modified Assessment • CST – California Standards Test • STAR – Standardized Testing and Reporting program

  14. Appendix B – 2011 Academic Performance Index by School API 900+ Elkhorn 992Middle College 908 API 750 – 799 Mosher 799Tokay Colony 796Live Oak 795Lodi High 791Morada 774Clairmont 772McAuliffe 764Lakewood 760Woodbridge 759Westwood 757Bear Creek 756Lockeford 753 API 800 – 899 Podesta Ranch 852Vinewood 845Larson 836Silva 830Reese 819Muir 816Borchardt 815Morgan 815

  15. Appendix B – 2011 Academic Performance Index by School API 700 – 749 Adams 749Davis 748Wagner-Holt 742Houston 739Tokay High 735Lodi Middle 733Creekside 724Nichols 723Beckman 723Joe Serna Charter 718Washington 717Millswood 713Needham 711Parklane 704Sutherland 703Delta Sierra 700 Below 700 . Victor 692Oakwood 690Lawrence 687McNair 686Heritage 652Independence 605Henderson 577Liberty 571Plaza Robles 570

More Related