1 / 17

KAUST Digital Communication EE – 242

KAUST Digital Communication EE – 242. Outage Models. Prepared by: Ahmad Dehwah & Emad Al- Hemyari. Outline:. Introduction. Approaches of analyzing the outage. Motivation and previous work System Model. Conclusion. References. Q & A. Definition.

nemo
Download Presentation

KAUST Digital Communication EE – 242

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. KAUSTDigital Communication EE – 242 Outage Models Prepared by: Ahmad Dehwah & Emad Al-Hemyari

  2. Outline: • Introduction. • Approaches of analyzing the outage. • Motivation and previous work • System Model. • Conclusion. • References. • Q & A.

  3. Definition • Outage models are applied in wireless communication systems, which are subjected to • fading • and other interfering signals to predict their performance. The performance of a given system is considered to be unacceptable when the Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio (SINR) is below a given threshold. i.e, SINR<z0

  4. Ways of analysis Different analysis ways to approach this problem can be followed depending on the way an outage model is defined:  • The simplest definition introduced before: SINR<z0 • Interference-limited model: SIR Signal power < defined power protection ratio neglecting the receiver background noise and the thermal noise • Noise-Limited model: where noise is treated as co-channel interference. Signal power< the powers of (total interference + noise) by power protection margins • Minimum Signal Power Constraint: signal power< total interference power by a protection ratio and Signal power<minimum power level in the presence of thermal noise.

  5. How is it quantified? • Such reliability study of outage is conducted in terms of error probability given that the SINR is above the given threshold. Pr(Error|SINR>z0)

  6. Motivation The motivation behind this study of outage models: • No closed form expression of the probability of outage for a sum of K multiple interfering signals with different powers of the same distribution. • Previous work either considered limited number of interferers or numerical approximations. • Different communication systems require different conditions on the definition of the outage to achieve certain reliability. • Performance analysis of BPSK system through a Rayleigh fading channel is conducted in terms of Pr(Error|SINR>z0) rather than just studying the probability of outage.

  7. Where does the randomness come from?

  8. System Model • The signal at the receiver front is of the following form: Where • Sk(t): is the kth interfering signal (k=0, 1, …, K). • n(t): is a Gaussian noise of two sided power spectral density N0/Tb. • τ: is a uniform time offset of S(t) over [0,2π].

  9. Randomness • There are three combinations to consider the SINR components according to our system model. • -Signal -Interference - Noise • Each of these parameters can be either deterministic or random.

  10. The Interfering signal form • The kth interfering signal (k=0, 1, …., K) is: Where • Sk: is the average received power • Xk: is the Rayliegh fading level of the kth signal with . • φk: is uniform over [0,2π] and φ0=0. • Xk and φk are mutually independent random variables • Ψ(t): is the shaping waveform

  11. The decision variable Now the decision variable at the output of the correlator is given by: Where • η: is Gaussian Random variable with variance . • Ik: is the multiple access interference component due to the kth signal given by:

  12. Interference component

  13. SINR

  14. Conditional CDF

  15. CDF

  16. Conclusion Q & A

  17. References 1. A. Annamalai, C. Tellambura, and V. K. Bhargava, .Simple and accurate methods for outage analysis in cellular mobile radio systems-a uni_ed approach,. IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 49, pp. 303-316, Feb. 2001. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=905889 2. D. Dardari, V. Tralli, and R. Verdone, .On the capacity of slotted Aloha with Rayleigh fading: the role played by the number of interferers,. IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 4, pp. 155-157, May 2000. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=846496 3. K. A. Hamdi, . Exact probability of error of BPSK communication links subjected to asynchronous interference in Rayleigh fading environment,. IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 50, pp. 1577 - 1579, Oct. 2002 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1044597 4. K. A. Hamdi, On the reliability of outage models http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=18184207

More Related