1 / 64

ICT – EU Japan Coordinated Call

ICT – EU Japan Coordinated Call. Objective ICT-2013.10.1 EU-Japan research and development Cooperation. European Commission - DG INFSO.

kordell
Download Presentation

ICT – EU Japan Coordinated Call

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ICT – EU Japan Coordinated Call Objective ICT-2013.10.1 EU-Japan research and development Cooperation European Commission - DG INFSO "The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission"

  2. JAPAN – EU Research and Development Cooperation-Background- Logic: Program to Program co-operation 3rd EU-Japan Symposium 2010 Oct. 20-21 @ Tampere 2nd Japan -EU Symposium 2009 Oct. 13 -14 @ Tokyo 1st EU-Japan Symposium 2008 Jun. 8- Jun. 10 @ Brussels 4th Japan -EU Symposium 2012 Jan. 19 @ Tokyo http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/foi/research/eu-japan/index_en.htm

  3. Outline of the Coordinated Call Opening: 2 October 2012 Close : 29 November 2012 Funding : to EU communities from EC Funding : to Japanese communities from Japan Administration: Evaluation : Joint evaluation committee from Japan and EU Evaluation: end of January-February 2013 Project start : April 2013 (Tentative) Project life time : 36 months

  4. Cooperation Field between Japan and EU EU-Japan ICT Coordinated Call Topics: • a) Optical Communications • b) Wireless Communications • c) Cybersecurity for improved resilience against cyber threats d) Extending the cloud paradigm to the Internet of Things - Connected objects and sensor clouds within the service perspective e) Global scale experiments over federated testbeds: Control, tools and applications f) Green & content centric networks

  5. Key characteristics • Excellent proposals • Solid consortia • Innovative work • Proven implementation capability • Good impact both on EU and JP • Catalytic role for further bilateral cooperation Budget • EC Funding for the European project • 1.5 M Euros X 6= 9 M Euros • MIC/NICT Funding for the Japanese project • Similar amount

  6. Expected Impact (Generic) Collaborative targeted research and prototyping enable deepened and continued collaboration between European and Japanese researchers and industry, towards the creation of sustainable research links benefiting researchers and industry competitiveness of both sides.

  7. 1,5 M€ for EU partners +similar budget from Japan FP7-ICT- 2013-EU-Japan DDL: 29 Nov 12 (TBC) • a) Optical Communications • Aim • to achieve efficient and reliable Ethernet transport at 100 Gbit/s rates using single-mode or multi-mode fibre for enhanced capacities in short and long range all-optical networks • to prove, and if needed, contribute to further advancement of standards such as IEEE802.3ba, ITU-T G.709, and OIF Implementation Agreement • Developments of components if needed are to be integrated into an overall system view • Impact • Efficient high rate Ethernet transport and standardisation spin off • Key enabling technologies for the future generations of high-speed all-optical networks with improved economic, spectral and energy efficiency • Joint EU-Japan contribution to standardization bodies and fora STREP

  8. b) Wireless technologies The use of millimetre bands,both in the context ofin-door, in-house applications and the possibility to look for use in outdoor applications like sensing or fibre extensions. Achievement of short-range wireless transmission and networking in the teraherz frequency bands. A roadmap towards a possible common standardisation in future high-capacity short-range technologies and sensing technologies. 8

  9. Impact Better exploitation of new spectrum parts for short range, very high capacity communication and high resolution sensing applications. Key enabling technologies for the future generations of short-range wireless systems with improved economic, spectral and energy efficiency. Joint identification of standardization requirements and contribution to standardization bodies and fora 9

  10. Wireless FP7 Projects • 4G and beyond • ARTIST4G (IP, DoCoMO, Mitsubishi) - interference management • EXALTED (IP) – 4G and M2M • BeFEMTO (STREP, NEC, DoCoMo) - Femtocells/LTE-A • BuNGee (STREP) - High-capacity 4G • FREEDOM (STREP) – Femtocells, scalability • MONET (STREP) – hybrid ad hoc/satellite networks • HURRICANE (STREP) – handover/cooperative networking • eMobility NetWorld (CA) – Mobility, wireless Internet • UNIVERSELF (IP, NEC) – network management and self-organisation • SOCRATES (STREP) – Self-organisation, wireless • SENSEI (IP, NEC) – Sensor networks • Spectrum efficiency • PHYDAS (STREP) – Filter bank-based multicarrier • ROCKET (STREP) – Agile spectrum usage • CARE (CA) - Antennas • LOLA (STREP) - Latency M2M • SAMURAI (STREP) – Multi-user MIMO • MIMAX (STREP) – Advanced MIMO • EU-MESH (STREP) – QoS, mobility and security • WALTER (STREP) – UWB testbed • Cognitive radio • ACROPOLIS (NoE) - Cooperative communication • QoSMOS (IP, NEC Japan and UK) - Opportunistic spectrum access • E3 (IP) – Cognitive wireless systems • EUWB (IP) – Coexisting short-range radio, UWB • FARAMIR (STREP, Toshiba) - Dynamic Spectrum Access • QUASAR (STREP) - Secondary spectrum access • ARAGORN (STREP, Toshiba) – Self-configuration • COGEU (STREP) - TV white spaces • SACRA (STREP) - Multi-band cognitive radio (HW) • SAPHYRE (STREP) – Voluntary sharing, self-organisation • WHERE2 (STREP) – Radio estimators, positioning • ONEFIT (STREP, NEC) – Cognitive management systems • SENDORA (STREP) – Sensor network aided cognitive radio • Energy Efficiency • EARTH (IP, DoCoMo) - wireless networks • ECONET (IP) – fixed networks • TREND (NoE) – all network segements • C2POWER (STREP) - terminals 10

  11. c) Cybersecurity for improved resilience against cyber threats Research on cybersecurity for improved resilience against cyber threats (leak of information, denial of service, malware) Develop technologies and strategies for: improving and enhancing cybersecurity in heterogeneous networked, service and computing environments facilitate the early identification of cyber-attacks. 11

  12. Cybersecurity Demonstrable and state-of-the-art prototype to improve and enhance cybersecurity against existing and emerging cyber threats in Europe and Japan. Potential research topics include: privacy protection, database security, secure software development, fundamental security technologies based on cryptographic methods and protocols for cloud security, smart-phone security and future network security. 12

  13. Impact Established international critical mass to develop new approaches and instruments in the fight against emerging cyber threats. Reinforced policy coordination between the EU and Japan as well as other potential international partners. 13

  14. Trust and Security FP7 Projects http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/security/projects_en.html 14

  15. d) Extending the Cloud paradigm to the Internet of Things ‐ Connected objects and sensor clouds within the service perspective Peter Friess / Maria Tsakali peter.friess@ec.europa.eu / maria.tsakali@ec.europa.eu Call opening: 2nd October 2012 Call closing: 29th November 2012

  16. Research Objective What are you looking for? • Current cloud technology lacks features for secure and flexible services that make use of distributed sensing devices and a high quantity of object instances. • The research should focus on the combination of Cloud and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies and to investigate the development of cloud‐based service platforms taking into account the IoT perspectives on massive data storage and communication needs in the cloud for the execution of real‐time services.

  17. What are you looking for? – Details of scope • Sound demonstration on how the Internet of Things concept can be enriched and completed by the Cloud paradigm and approach (on sensor, infrastructure, middleware and applications towards end‐users level). • Establishment of a scalable and flexible service platform architecture for enabling secure and smart, partly virtualised, services with processing, integrating, and visualizing contents combined with ambient real life information. • Additional focus on an Internet of Things‐Cloud reference test facilities for ensuring global interoperability for connectivity, services and privacy by design/trusted solutions. • Concentration on the Smart Cities perspective with a) a business context (business process improvements and industrial applications) and b) societal context (social and environmental applications). • Road‐mapping and recommendations for further activities in the combination of Internet of Things and Cloud. • Technology for enabling real‐time secure communication services with connecting trillions objects and cloud service users. • Creation of long-lasting partnerships with industry and academia

  18. Research Objective Is this new or has it been called before? Although some EU-Japan co-operation on Internet of Things has taken place in the context of support actions, this collaboration is new and goes one step further. Current project portfolio • IOT projects / support actions like IOT-A, Butler, iCore IOT-i etc. (Call 5 and 7) are bundled in the IERC – Internet of Things European Research Cluster • Cloud projects (call 1, 5) like RESERVOIR, VISION- CLOUD, OPTIMIS, CONTRAIL, etc.http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/ssai/projects-call5_en.html

  19. Research Objective What do you NOT want? • Proposal relating only to Internet of Things and Cloud and not clearly demonstrating the integrated perspective • Academia-driven proposals • Lack of relevant industry participation on both sides • Missing long-term vision and planned activities of the EU-Japan co-operation

  20. Research Objective – Key actors Who are the leading players? Industry and academia from both sides are very actively doing research in these two domains, also takinginto account the societal perspective Is there a key group of actors or ETP driving this? • IERC - Internet of Things European Research Cluster • EIoTA - European Internet of Things Alliance (explicitly between EU and Japan) • EPoSS • Cloud projects (call 1, 5) like RESERVOIR, VISION- CLOUD, OPTIMIS, CONTRAIL, etc.http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/ssai/projects-call5_en.html

  21. Research Objective Are there any additional / background documents? Software & services, Cloud projects • http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/ssai/projects_en.html • http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/ssai/projects-call5_en.html IERC Clusterbook 2012 http://www.internet-of-things-research.eu/pdf/IERC_Cluster_Book_2012_WEB.pdf

  22. Future Outlook What are prospects of this area in H2020? This call bridges to H2020 by • Integrating related and complementary areas • Focusing on innovation partnerships • Providing a roadmap for further research collaborations in these areas • Long lasting industrial and academic partnerships

  23. e) Global scale experiments over federated testbeds: Control, tools and applications Futur Internet Research & Experimentation (FIRE) Call opening: 2nd October 2012 Call closing: 29th November 2012

  24. What is FIRE? FIRE Experimental Facility Validation User Communities Long-term Research Large Scale Experiments Test bed 9 Test bed 1 Test bed 1 Test bed 2 Test bed 2 Test bed 3 Test bed 3 Exp 5 Exp 2 Requirements Test bed 4 Test bed 4 Test bed 5 Test bed 5 Exp 4 Exp1 Test bed 6 Test bed 6 Exp 3 Test bed 7 Test bed 8 Test bed 7 Test bed 8 Federated Service Testbeds Federated Network Testbeds FIRE Research

  25. FIRE current projects http://www.ict-fire.eu/ Coordination and SupportActions FIRESTATION

  26. Research Objective EU-JP call Target • The goal is to enable experiments across testbeds as a framework for understanding the management of heterogeneous resources, the access to these resources and the evaluation of their usage. What we are looking for: • - Software solutions that are suited to control and deploy an experiment, using distributed resources of various testbeds, possibly wired and wireless. • - Solutions will be demonstrated for various scenarios ranging from wireless testing to Information‐Centric networking. • - The solutions should then be disseminated for a large adoption, eventually going beyond the testbed framework if appropriate.

  27. Research Objective in details - Research will focuses on Software Defined Networking (SDN) paradigm which enables parallel deployment of slices assigned to virtual network providers. - The activity should produce a demonstration of the relevance of the proposed solutions in a heterogeneous environment. - The software developed in the research projects should target deployment and evaluation in the available testing facilities on both sides (OFELIA, OpenLab, JGN‐X).

  28. Research Objective Expected Impact Interoperability of distributed resources for experiments across heterogeneous testbeds to help researchers both from academia and industry from Japan and Europe to work together for the future of internet

  29. Avoid - Proposal relating only to future internet research and not clearly demonstrating the integrated perspective - Pure academia-driven proposals - Missing long-term vision and planned activities of the EU-Japan co-operation

  30. Thanks for your attention! Contacts: Jacques Babot Team Leader for International activities European Commission Communications Networks, Content & Technology Experimental Platforms Jacques.babot@ec.europa.eu • Further Information: • http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/fire • http://www.ict-fire.eu • FIRE LinkedIn: //linkd.in/x1CcZ1

  31. f) Green and Content-centric networks Change in network architecture from host-oriented to content-centric networking Particular importance are issues related to naming, addressing and routing as well as resource control, access analysis and Digital Rights Management Needs to address the migration perspective from the current Internet protocols and architecture Integration with power consumption information to enable optimization of contents location and routing 31

  32. Impact Content centric networking architecture for low energy efficient content delivery and associated standardisation requirements 32

  33. Typical Projects 4WARD/SAIL NetInf - Network of Information PSIRP/PURSUIT PubSub - Publish Subscribe Routing COMET CMP - Content Mediation Plane CONVERGENCE CONET – Content Network Xerox PARC CCN/NDN - Content-Centric Networking /Named Data Networking 33

  34. Special requirements • Two proposals submitted (EU and MIC/NICT): • The description of the work (part B) will be common for the two coordinated proposals • Two different administrative parts. • The EU FP7 proposal cover the EC participants and their costs. • The proposal submitted to MIC/NICT cover the Japanese participants and their costs

  35. Special requirements • The Part B must contain as an Annex a final draft of a required Coordination Agreement to be signed between the two consortia of two coordinated projects (see Annex 4 of the Guide)… showing that the two consortia have already taken into account how they are going to regulate their cooperation activities, and in particular how they are going to deal with IPR issues in a balanced way, respecting the FP7 Rules of Participation.

  36. Special requirements • Proposals must demonstrate a balanced effort between the two coordinated projects and a research plan properly involving coordinated research activities between Europe and Japan

  37. EU-Japan ICT Coordinated Call- Background Information at web sites - EU-Japan Future Internet symposium 2008-2012 http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/foi/research/eu-japan/index_en.htm EU-Japan FIRE workshop – Aalborg (9/5/2012) presentations http://www.ict-fire.eu/events/eu-japan-workshop-aalborg.html EU-Japan at ICT Proposers Day – Warsaw (26-27/09/2012) http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/events/cf/ictpd12/item-display.cfm?id=8435 A supporting website of advice, information and documentation: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/

  38. Contact Points Japanese research activity information: Contact : Tatsuo Tai, international-rad@soumu.go.jp (MIC) or Masayuki Fujise, info-itaku@ml.nict.go.jp (NICT) EC: Francisco Ibanez, Bernard Barani (General) Wireless, CCN: Pertti Jauhiainen Optical: Bart Van Caeneghem, Pertti Jauhiainen Security: Martin Muehleck IoT/Cloud: Peter Friess, Maria Tsakali FIRE: Jacques Babot

  39. Proposals and projects in the coordinated call Background information FP7-ICT-EU-Japan

  40. Getting help with your proposal The ICT theme provides: Model grant agreements, guides, checklists, etc. at: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/find-doc_en.html An ICT Information desk for proposers’ questions ict@ec.europa.eu An IPR Helpdesk http://www.ipr-helpdesk.org/index.html A Helpdesk for electronic proposal submission support@epss-fp7.org And a network of National Contact Points in Europe and beyond: http://cordis.europa.eu/ist/ncps.htm

  41. EU JP Coordinated Call -Structure

  42. For the EU-JP call Purpose: Objective driven research more limited in scope than an IP Target audience: Industry incl. SMEs, research institutes, universities Typical duration: 36 months Optimum consortium: 3-6 participants Typical total EU contribution: 1.500.000 € Fixed workplan and fixed partnership for duration Focused projects (STREPs)

  43. Minimum consortia Three independent legal entities from three different EU Member States or Associated countries (presently: Albania (AL), Bosnia-Herzegovina (BA), Croatia (HR), the Faroes (FO), Iceland (IS), Israel (IL), Liechtenstein (LI), FYR of Macedonia (MK), Montenegro (ME), Norway (NO), Serbia (SR), Switzerland (CH), Turkey (TR) EEIGs composed of members that meet the criteria above can participate International (intergovernmental) organisations can participate Participants from third countries if in addition to minima

  44. Proposal Part A (online) A1 Title, acronym, objective etc. free keywords 2000 character proposal abstract previous/current submission (in FP7) A2 Legal address/administrator address/R&D address Clear identification as SME/Public body/Research centre/ Educ. establishment Proposer identification code PIC (later calls) A3 More cost detail (direct/indirect costs distinguished)

  45. Specific requirements for coordinated call Part A A1 Duration: No more than 36 months 2000 character proposal abstract: Including Title and acronym of the coordinated proposal [submitted to the MIC/NICT previous/current submission (in FP7): Include here the acronym of the coordinated proposal to the MIC/NICT A2 Only include in this section the participants to the EU call Use Proposer identification code (PIC) if you have it A3 Total EC contribution for the EU proposal can not exceed € 1.5 m

  46. Proposal Part B (pdf format only) Part B format directly linked to evaluation criteria Summary S&T quality (bullet points = sections) Implementation (idem) Impact (idem) Ethics Section lengths recommended Part B templates are available through the EPSS

  47. Specific requirements for coordinated call Part B Part B is common for the two coordinated calls and should clearly describe the activities by both the EU and JP participants.

  48. Specific requirements for coordinated call Part B Part B is common for the two coordinated calls and should clearly describe the activities by both the EU and JP participants.

  49. Specific requirements for coordinated call Part B Part B must contain as an Annex a final draft of a required Coordination Agreement to be signed between the two consortia of two coordinated projects (see Annex 4 of the Guide). The content of the Coordination Agreement will not be examined during the evaluation, but should show that the two consortia have already taken into account how they are going to regulate their cooperation activities, and in particular how they are going to deal with IPR issues in a balanced way, respecting the FP7 Rules of Participation. (A specific Consortium Agreement is also required for the participants in the EU project; this is not included in the proposal.)

  50. Specific requirements for coordinated callCoordination Agreement

More Related