Southeast Asia 1900-45: The Rise of Nationalism

1. Southeast Asia 1900-45:The Rise of Nationalism • March 13, 2014

2. Review: • How is Communism different from Fascism? • When did the Chinese Nationalist Party and the Chinese Communist Party Split? • How did the growing war with the Japanese influence the images of the Nationalist Party and the Communist Party?

3. Korea and Taiwan in wartime • Japan created “comfort stations” for its troops overseas. Most of the “comfort women” were Korean. (p. 419) • Both Koreans and Taiwanese were drafted into the Japanese military. Some volunteered for the officer corps. • There was little resistance within Taiwan or Korea to the war effort.

4. Cost of the war to China • Possibly as many as 3 million soldiers killed. • Possibly as many as 15 to 20 million civilians died. • Tens of millions had become homeless over the course of the war. • The economy was bankrupt, and therefore so was the Nationalist Party.

5. The Battle for Okinawa • In spring, 1945, the US invaded the Japanese homeland, picking Okinawa as the place to establish a beachhead. (p. 423) • What was the impact of the Battle of Okinawa on the Okinawans? Did it make them feel more Japanese? • What was the impact of the Battle of Okinawa on the Japanese? Did it convince them to surrender? • What was the impact of the Battle of Okinawa on the Americans? Did it lead to the A-bomb?

6. Two cities obliterated • For a photo-essay on the dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, go to • http://www.english.illinois.edu/maps/poets/g_l/levine/bombing.htm • For a short video of the bombing of Hiroshima, go to • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF4LQaWJRDg • You can watch a short video on the Bombing of Nagasaki:  The US Justification at:  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncq_Wye43TM

7. The Atomic Bomb • Why did the US drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? • Were the atomic bombs worse than the fire-bombings that preceded them? (p. 423) • Were such attacks on civilians justified? • What convinced the Japanese to surrender on August 15? (p. 423) • What role did the Soviet attack play in that decision?

8. Southeast Asia in 1940 • http://images.classwell.com/mcd_xhtml_ebooks/2005_world_history/images/mcd_mwh2005_0618377115_p363_f01.jpg

9. Japan’s Empire • See map on p. 422

10. Rise of Nationalism • Lockard defines nationalism as follows: • “nationalism involved a sense of common feeling transcending class and ethnicity among people who desire to express that wider community by establishing an independent country.” (p. 135) • But isn’t ethnicity, newly defined, an important feature of nationalism? And doesn’t that make it possible for nationalism to shade over into racism? • Did Japanese rule inspire nationalism in Southeast Asia? (Lockard, p.145)

11. the Philippines • Under US control, the Philippines became the first colony to promote mass education. 65% of Filipinos were literate in one language or another by 1935. Tagalog (Filipino) was declared the national language in 1939. • In 1936, the US government promised to grant the Philippines complete independence by 1946. • The Japanese did not find as much support in the Philippines as they did in much of the rest of Southeast Asia. • During the Japanese occupation, resistance to the Japanese took two forms: a pro-American underground movement, and a Communist underground movement. The latter wanted to seize land from rich landlords, some of whom collaborated with the Japanese, and give it to landless peasants. (Lockard, 147)

12. Indonesia (Lockard, 135-39) • The Dutch finally conquered Aceh in the early part of the 20th century, with the help of Javanese troops. • In the last decades of colonial rule, a Muslim League and an Indonesian Communist Party appeared, but the lead in the nationalist movement was taken by Sukarno’s Indonesian Nationalist Party. However, there were also movements to “purify” Islam as practiced by Indonesians. (p. 136) • A unifying language (Bahasa Indonesian) appeared (p. 136) • Sukarno was a charismatic speaker who worked hard to create an inclusive Indonesian identity: “One Nation, Indonesia; One People, Indonesian; One Language, Indonesian” (He ignored religious differences) (p. 138) None of these were an accurate depiction of the Dutch East Indies before 1900.

13. Sukarno as Independence Fighterhis trial in 1930. • http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t15208.html

14. Malaya • Most of the people on the Malay peninsula today are the descendants of people who immigrated from Indonesia, China, or India starting in the late 19th century. The population of the Federated Malay states was 218,000 in 1891 but 1.7 million by 1931, 41% of whom were Chinese. • Weak nationalism because Chinese identified with China, Malays with other Malays, Indians with India, etc. Imagining a new nation of Malaysia did not bring those three groups together. (Lockard, p. 144) • The Malays began emphasizing their religion (Islam) and their purported local roots to distinguish themselves from the Chinese and the South Asians, and to claim that Malaysia is their country. A Malay Communist Party emerged, but the vast majority of its members were Chinese.

15. Burma (Myanmar)Lockard, pp. 141-43 • There was a long history of kingdoms in what is now Myanmar, but it was under the British that the Burmese were placed together with tribal peoples under one government. (Until 1937, the British also treated Burma as a province of India rather than as a separate colony) The British begin offering some local autonomy from 1937. • For the Burmese, just as we will see with the Sinhalese in Sri Lanka, Buddhism became a vehicle for asserting a distinctive national identity. This caused tension with the Christian tribal peoples in the north, as well as with Chinese and Indians living in Burma. • Some young Burmese formed a Burma Independence Army, which sought Japanese help in expelling the British. (p. 145)

16. Siam (Thailand) pp. 143-44. • Changed name from Siam to Thailand in 1939 • The modernizing Thai government (especially the king Rama VI) used Buddhism to unify the country, creating a national Buddhist hierarchy. It also build modern schools to teach Thai identity. This was in the 20th century, not the 19th century. • The military seized control of the country in 1932 and created a constitutional monarchy. Under military rule, we see Thailand moving closer to Fascism. There was also some official anti-Chinese sentiment until the government realized it needed Chinese help in running the economy.

17. Indochina pp. 139-141 • Five separate administrative regions under overall French colonial rule: Cochinchina (south), Annam (central), Tonkin (north), Cambodia, and Laos. • Vietnamese nationalists formed a Vietnamese Nationalist Party modelled after the Guomindang (KMT) in China. It was crushed when it rose up in revolt in 1930. • Then a new nationalist party arose: the Indochinese Communist Party, led by Ho Chi Minh. Ho Chi Minh was able to link nationalism and Communist and, by doing so, create a powerful anti-Japanese force. (To do that, he formed a united front called the Viet Minh. p. 145, and p. 148) • Japanese did not assume direct control of Indochina until 1945. Before that the pro-German French regime ruled Indo-China.

18. Two Asian Revolutionaries • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ho_Chi_Minh_Mao_Zedong_meeting.jpg • Mao Zedong and Ho Chi Minh

19. The Appeal of Communismto Some Nationalists • Communism criticized imperialism. • It promised a chance to jump ahead of capitalist countries and take the lead in human history • It offered techniques for creating highly disciplined revolutionary (Leninist) parties. • However, it wasn’t successful in countries in which one religion (Islam, Catholicism, Theravada Buddhism) was dominant.

20. Impact of Japanese rule in Southeast Asia • Showed that the West was vulnerable --The British, the Dutch, the Americans, and the French had all been defeated by an Asian people. • The Japanese claimed to be liberating Southeast Asians from Western domination, and they actually brought some local people into their puppet governments.(They claimed to be promoting a “Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere.”) This gave local leaders a taste of self-government, which stimulated an even greater desire for self-rule.