1 / 36


Leadership. Aligning people towards common goals and empowering them to take actions needed to reach them. Historically important studies. The Iowa Leadership Studies Important features: 1 st attempt to experimentally determine effect of leadership styles on groups Experimentally crude

Download Presentation


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.


Presentation Transcript

  1. Leadership • Aligning people towards common goals and empowering them to take actions needed to reach them.

  2. Historically important studies The Iowa Leadership Studies Important features: • 1st attempt to experimentally determine effect of leadership styles on groups • Experimentally crude • Results showed that different style of leadership can produce different reactions from similar group.

  3. The Experiment (R.Lippitt & R.K.White, 1930s) • 10 years old boys were subjected to different leadership styles in hobby classes • Styles of leadership: authoritarian, democratic & Laissez-Faire. • Purpose: examine patterns of aggressive behavior in the boys

  4. Findings: • Authoritarian leadership:aggressive or apathetic reaction resulting from frustration. • Laissez-faire leadership: greatest number of aggressive acts. • Democratic leadership: fell in between the two extremes

  5. The Ohio State Leadership Study • Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ) was developed and used to analyze leadership in various groups and situations. Findings: • Two dimensions of leadership emerged • Consideration (recognition of individual needs or relationships). High scorers were: • Open & friendly with subordinates • Treat subordinates as equals • Helped them solve personal/work problems

  6. 2. Initiating Structure (goal/task orientation). High scorers were: • put pressures to meet deadlines • Maintain standards of performance • Individuals who achieved ‘high-high’ were able to achieve higher levels of performance & job satisfaction Relevance: • First study to emphasize importance of both task & human dimensions in assessing leadership • Leadership was studied without being effective/ineffective

  7. The Early Michigan Leadership Studies • Prudential life insurance company • Twelve high-low productivity pairs of sections were kept under observation. • Each pair consisted of one high producing section and one low producing section. • Other factors were constant. • 24 supervisors & 419 workers were interviewed.

  8. Findings • Leadership behavior was categorized in two dimensions: • Employee-Oriented: emphasizes importance of inter-personal relations. High scorers: • personal interest in subordinate needs • accept individual differences among members • Production-Oriented: concerned with tasks & goals. Employees are means to achieve goals. Lead to lower motivation & productivity

  9. Result • Employee-Oriented leaders achieve higher job satisfaction & higher group productivity. • Production-Oriented leaders achieve lower job satisfaction & group productivity.

  10. Traditional theories of leadership Trait Theories • Concerned with identifying personality traits of leaders The great person theory • Leaders are born with certain traits that allows them to emerge out of situations and become leaders. • “Intelligence” :the only common trait.

  11. Group & Exchange theories • In ‘Group approach’ leadership is viewed in terms of leader’s behavior & how it affects/is affected by groups. • Classic Exchange theory means that there should be a positive exchange between leaders & followers.

  12. The Leader-Member Exchange Theory • Leaders treat individual subordinates differently • Develop a dyadic (two-person) relationship • Leader develops a ‘in-group’ & an ‘out-group’ of subordinates & treats tem accordingly • Research shows that ‘In-group’ subordinates: • Report fewer difficulties with leader • Perceive leader to be responsive to their needs • Assume greater responsibility & are high performers

  13. The leaders tend to: • ‘supervise’ those in the ‘out-group’ • Spend more time ‘leading’ those in the ‘In-group’. • The basis for choosing groups: • Similar attitudes & personality • Higher competence • Extraversion • Better performance • LMX is reciprocal process • Leaders help subordinate to achieve goals.

  14. Contingency theory of leadership • Leaders are viewed as products of time & situation • Leaders have to change their style depending on the situation Fiedler’s Contingency model of Leadership Effectiveness • Relationship between leadership style & favorableness of the situation • Under very favorable/unfavorable situations, task-directed / authoritarian leader is most effective • For moderately favorable: human oriented / democratic leader is most effective

  15. Situational favorableness is described in terms of three dimensions: • The leader-member relationship (extent to which leader is accepted& respected by subordinates) • The degree of task-structure (task is highly structured & everything is ‘spelled-out’ • The Leader’s position (authority & power attributed to leader’s position)

  16. Criticism: • Narrow focus on one trait of leadership • Ambiguity in dimensions’ measurement Contributions: • First contingency theory • Emphasizes importance of situation & leader’s characteristics for measuring effectiveness • Stimulated a great deal of research

  17. Path-Goal Leadership theory • Explains the impact of leader behavior on subordinate motivation, satisfaction & performance • Four styles of leadership (House): • Directive Leadership • Supportive leadership • Participative leadership • Achievement oriented leadership • Using one of the styles, leaders provides support & guidance to subordinates to achieve goals

  18. Attempts to influence subordinate perceptions & motivate them. • Situational factors that effect leaders behavior: • Personal characteristics of subordinates • Environmental demands & pressures facing subordinates

  19. The Path-Goal Relationship

  20. Modern theoretical processes of leadership Charismatic Leadership Theories • Who by the force of their personal abilities are capable for having profound & extraordinary effect on subordinates • Characteristics of charismatic leaders (Robert House): • Self confidence & confidence in subordinates • High expectations from subordinates • Vision • Leading by example

  21. Bass included: • Superior debating & persuasive skills • Technical expertise • Fostering of attitudinal, behavioral & emotional changes in followers.

  22. Transformational leadership theory • James MacGregor Burns identified two types of political leadership: • Transactional (involves an exchange relationship between leaders & followers) • Transformational (leader’s shifting the values, beliefs & needs of their followers) Transactional leaders: • Contingent rewards • Management by Exception(active/passive) • Laissez-faire

  23. Transformational Leaders: • Charisma • Inspiration • Intellectual stimulation • Individual consideration • Transactional leadership leads to mediocrity in many situations & transformational leadership leads to superior performance (Bass) Characteristics of effective transformational leaders: • Identify themselves as change agents

  24. Courageous • Believe in people • Value driven • Lifelong learners • Have the ability to deal with complexity, ambiguity & uncertainty • visionaries

  25. Classic Leadership Styles Blake & Mouton’s Managerial grid

  26. Hersey & Blanchard’s Situational Approach Two major styles of leaders: • Task style • Relationship style • Maturity level of the followers was incorporated . Criteria for maturity: • Degree of achievement orientation • Willingness to take responsibility • Amount of education/expertise • Effective leaders match up the situation to appropriate style of leadership

  27. Styles of leadership: • Telling style (high task; low relationship; effective when followers have low maturity) • Selling style (high task; high relationship;followers have low maturity) • Participating style (low task; high relationship; high maturity of followers) • Delegating style (low task; low relationship; very high maturity in followers)

  28. Vroom’s Leadership-Participation model • Relationship between leadership behavior & decision making style. • Leaders must adjust their behavior depending on the situation • Provides a sequential set of rules for ascertaining the types and amount of participation required in decision making in different situations.

  29. Problem attributes • Leader should assess a situation in terms of the problem attributes. • Two categories (for 12 attributes): • Decision Quality: cost consideration, information availability,nature of problem structure • Employee- acceptance: need for commitment, prior approval, conflicts, goal congruence (personal & orgn). • Others: subordinate information level, time constraint, geographical distance with subordinates, leaders’ motivation

  30. Leadership styles: • After identifying the nature of the problem, leader can adopt one of the following styles of leadership: • Autocratic I • Autocratic II • Consultive I • Consultive II • Group II

  31. Assumptions • Leaders can precisely classify problems by following the decisions tree format • Leaders are willing to and can adapt their style as per the situation • Employees accept leader’s classification of the situation & the leadership styles adopted

  32. Leadership styles • The way in which leaders influence their subordinates Various styles: • Autocratic • Consultative • Laissez-faire or subordinate-oriented • Democratic • Manipulative • Expert

  33. Likert’s four systems of management • System 1 management : ‘exploitive-authoritative’ style • System 2 management: ‘benevolent authoritative’ style • System 3 management: ‘consultative’ style • Style 4 management: ‘participative’ style

  34. What skills do leaders need? • Skills needed in the glogal economy: • Cultural flexibility • Communication skills • HRD skills • Creativity • Self-management of learning

  35. Whetten & Cameron’s list for effective leaders: • Verbal communication • Managing time & stress • Managing individual decisions • Recognizing, defining & solving problems • Motivating & influencing others • Delegating • Setting goals & articulating a vision • Self-awareness • Team building • Managing conflict

  36. Characteristics of these skills: • The skills are behavioral • Skills are contradictory or paradoxical • Skills are inter-related & overlapping.

More Related