1 / 29

Smiling Online: Applying face-to-face reference skills in a virtual environment

Smiling Online: Applying face-to-face reference skills in a virtual environment. Presented by Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist OCLC Research Marie L. Radford, Ph.D. Associate Professor Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.

debra
Download Presentation

Smiling Online: Applying face-to-face reference skills in a virtual environment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Smiling Online:Applying face-to-face reference skills in a virtual environment Presented by Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist OCLC Research Marie L. Radford, Ph.D. Associate Professor Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

  2. Seeking Synchronicity:Evaluating Virtual Reference Services from User, Non-User, and Librarian Perspectives • Why people use – or choose not to use – VRS • Ways to encourage non-users to try VRS • How to communicate with users of different age groups • How to boost accuracy and satisfaction with your VRS • How to handle impolite and impatient users

  3. Seeking Synchronicity: Evaluating Virtual Reference Services from User, Non-User, and Librarian Perspectives • Four project phases: • 8 Focus group interviews • 850 QuestionPoint chat transcripts analyzed • Online surveys 176 VRS librarians 184 VRS non-users 137 VRS users • 283 telephone interviews

  4. Libraries • Meet the information needs of differing groups • Largest groups • Baby boomers (1945-1964) • Cohort #1 (Born 1946 – 1954) • Cohort #2 (Born 1955 – 1964) • Millennials (1979 – 1994) • Screenagers (Born 1988 -1994)

  5. How to Communicate with Users of Different Age Groups • VRS Transcript Analysis

  6. Facilitators – DifferencesMillennials (n=296) vs. Adults (n=76) • Millennials demonstrated these behaviors less often than Adults • On average(per transcript) • Thanks • Self Disclosure • Closing Ritual • On average (per occurrence) • Seeking reassurance • Polite expressions

  7. Facilitators – DifferencesMillennials (n=296) vs. Adults (n=76) • Millennials demonstrated these behaviors more often than Adults • On average (per occurrence) • Agree to suggestion • Lower case • Greeting Ritual • Admit lack knowledge • Interjections/Hedges • Slang

  8. Barriers – DifferencesMillennials (n=296) vs. Adults (n=76) • Millennials demonstrated these behaviors more often than Adults • On average (per transcript) • Abrupt Endings • Impatience • Rude or Insulting

  9. Why People Use – OR Choose Not to Use – VRS • VRS Online Survey Analysis

  10. VRS User Demographics Online Surveys (n=137) • Majority Respondents • Female • Caucasian • 29-65 years old • Suburban public libraries

  11. VRS UsersReasons for Choosing VRS (n=137) • Convenience, convenience, convenience • Immediate answers • Lack of cost • Available 24/7 • Important to Screenagers • Efficiency • Enjoy medium • Millennials find much more enjoyment • Lack of intimidation

  12. VRS Users Other Generational Differences • Millennials • More “desperate” needs for quick answers • Multi-tasking • Screenagers • Greater connection to the librarian • Opportunity for dialogue • Elimination of geographic boundaries • Less intimidating than the reference desk • Librarian’s reactions more clear • Easier to express thanks to a librarian

  13. VRS Non-User Demographics Online Surveys (n=184) • Majority Respondents • Female • Caucasian • 12-28 years old • Suburban and urban public libraries

  14. VRS Non-Users Why they Choose Among Modes • Convenience, convenience, convenience • Working from home • At night or on weekends • Millennials especially value convenience

  15. VRS Non-Users Why they Choose Among Modes • Qualities of the individual librarian • Knowledge (FtF) • Trustworthy sources (FtF) • Persistence (FtF & telephone) • Friendliness (FtF & telephone) • Perception that librarian is too busy • More prevalent with Boomers

  16. Reasons for Non-use of VRS • Boomers & Millennials • Do not know • Service availability • Librarian can help • 24/7 availability • Satisfied with other information sources • Boomer concerns • Their own • Computer literacy • Typing speed • Complexity of chat environment

  17. Important to both VRS Users & Non-Users • Librarian Qualities • Knowledge of sources & systems • Positive attitude • Good communication skills • Accuracy of answers/information

  18. One Simple Way to Boost Accuracy • For ready reference queries, • answer specific question asked! • Before you push a general info. page… • Make sure it has specific & exact answer to user’s question

  19. Other Simple Ways to Boost Accuracy • For all types of queries • Clarify the question! • Use a follow-up question! • E.g., “Did this completely answer your question?”

  20. Multiple Demands on the Library

  21. Implications for Practice • Communication critically important! • Difficult process • Generational differences add to complexity! • Need user education for more realistic expectations

  22. Avoiding Impatient or Rude Behavior • Greetings – crucial moment • Chance to establish personal relationship & trust • Use self-disclosure to build rapport • Recognize that any user may be impatient at times • Question complex? Tell them “this may take some time” & ask if they can wait • Don’t force instruction

  23. Do Use common sense & intuition Remain polite Apologize as appropriate Don’t Take it personally Mirror rudeness Reprimand user Encountering Rude or Impatient Behavior?

  24. Encouraging Non-users to Try VRS • Creative marketing • Promote full range of reference options • Reassure young people that chat is safe • Build positive relationships 1 person at a time, whether FtF, phone, or online

  25. In Conclusion • Use your basic interpersonal skills • Chat & FtF – very similar interactions • And, most importantly… • Relax about time pressure • Be yourself & show your smile :) <grin>

  26. Additional Resources • Boomer Nation: The Largest and Richest Generation Ever and how it Changed America, S. Gillon. New York: Free Press, 2004. • College Student Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources, OCLC, Dublin: OH, 2005 • Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584-2069, N. Strauss & W. Howe. New York: Morrow, 1991. • Generations at Work, S. Luck. http://dps.dgs.virginia.gov/Forum2006/Presentations/S201%20PPSluck%20Generations.ppt • Growing Up Digital, D. Tapscott. www.growingupdigital.com • Millennial Behaviors and Demographics. Sweeney,R. http://library1.njit.edu/staff-folders/sweeney/Millennials/Article-Millennial-Behaviors.doc • Millennial Net Values: Disconnects between Libraries and the Information Age Mindset, R. Mcdonald & C. Thomas. http://dscholarship.lib.fsu.edu/general/4/ • Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation, W. Howe & N. Strauss. New York: Random House, 2000.

  27. Additional Resources • Net Generation Students and Libraries, J. Lippincott. In Educating the Net Generation, Educause 2005. • Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources, OCLC Dublin: OH, 2005. • Playing the Future: How Kids’ Culture Can Teach Us to Thrive in an Age of Chaos, D. Rushkoff.  New York: HarperCollins, 1996. • Sense-making the Information Confluence:  The Hows and the Whys of College and University User Satisficing of Information Needs, Brenda Dervin, Ohio State University, Principal Investigator; Lynn Silipigni Connaway and Chandra Prabha, Co-Investigators. Institute for Museums and Library Services Research Grant, 2003-2005. http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/imls/default.htm • “Screenagers” and Live Chat Reference: Living Up to the Promise, M.L. Radford & L.S. Connaway. (February, 2007). Scan, 26(6), 31-39. • Studying Students: The Undergraduate Research Project at the University of Rochester, N. Foster & S. Gibbons. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2007.

  28. End Notes • This is one of the outcomes from the project Seeking Synchronicity: Evaluating Virtual Reference Services from User, Non-User, and Librarian Perspectives • Funded by IMLS, Rutgers University, & OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. • Special thanks to Jocelyn DeAngelis Williams, Patrick Confer, Timothy J. Dickey, Julie Strange, Susanna Sabolcsi-Boros, Mary Anne Reilly, Jannica Heinstrom, and Andrea Simzak. • This presentation is available at project web site: http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/synchronicity/

  29. Questions & Comments Lynn Silipigni Connaway Marie L. Radford

More Related