1 / 42

Civil Rights & Civil Liberties

Civil Rights & Civil Liberties. Chapters 5 & 6. Background of the Civil Rights Movement. Until fairly recently in our history, African Americans could not: Vote Attend integrated schools Sit in front seats of buses Buy homes in white neighborhoods. 2 Main Reasons .

chet
Download Presentation

Civil Rights & Civil Liberties

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Chapters 5 & 6

  2. Background of the Civil Rights Movement • Until fairly recently in our history, African Americans could not: • Vote • Attend integrated schools • Sit in front seats of buses • Buy homes in white neighborhoods

  3. 2 Main Reasons • There are 2 main reasons that accounts for the slow pace with which African Americans attained their civil rights • 1. Politically dominant white minorities in the South feared potential competition for jobs, land, public services, and living space from African Americans • 2. The white minority at the national level opposed African Americans from organizing politically

  4. Background of Civil Rights Movement • Progress in achieving civil rights for African Americans depended on • Finding more white allies • Shifting to a more policy-making arena • Civil rights leaders broadened their base by publicizing the denial to African Americans of essential, widely accepted liberties • Ex – voting and organizing

  5. Background of Civil Rights Movement • They turned what had been perceived as an interest group set of issues into majoritarian issues • Also moved their legal and political struggle from Congress to the federal courts

  6. Civil Rights Movement in the Courts • 14th Amendment – 1868 • Both an opportunity & problem for black activists • A narrow interpretation of the amendment argued that African Americans had equal legal rights but could otherwise be treated differently than whites

  7. Civil Rights Movement in the Courts • Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) • Adopted the narrow view • Found separate-but-equal to be constitutional

  8. Civil Rights Movement in the Courts • National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) • Established 1909 • Lobby Washington • Publicize black grievances • Most influential role – played in the courtroom

  9. Civil Rights Movement in the Courts • Fought the separate but equal doctrine • Established a 3 step process to attack school segregation • 1. Persuade the Supreme Court to declare unconstitutional the laws creating schools that were separate but obviously unequal • In regards to funding, facilities, faculty, etc. • 2. Persuade the Supreme Court to declare unconstitutional the laws creating schools that were separate but not so obviously equal

  10. Civil Rights Movement in the Courts • 3. Have the Supreme Court rule that separate schools are inherently unequal and therefore unconstitutional • In a series of court cases that stretched from 1938-1954, NAACP implemented its strategy

  11. Civil Rights Movement in the Courts • Brown v. Board of Education 1954 • Supreme Court ruled that separate schools were inherently unequal • Overturn Plessy in a unanimous decision • Brown was a landmark decision • Reasons for it and the means chosen to implement it were important & controversial

  12. Civil Rights Movement in the Courts • 3 issues emerged from the decision: • 1 – Implementation • A class-action lawsuit that applied to all similarly situated African American students • Court later ruled that integration should proceed in public schools “with all deliberate speed” • In the South – turned out to be a snail’s pace

  13. Civil Rights Movement in the Courts • 1 – Implementation, cont. • 1956 – More than 100 southern members of Congress signed a “Southern Manifesto” • Condemned the Brown decision as an abuse of judicial power • Pledged to use all lawful means to reverse the decision • Late 1950s – early 1960s – National Guard and regular army paratroopers were used to escort black students into formally all-white schools and universities

  14. Civil Rights Movement in the Courts • 2 – Rationale • Decision in Brown argued that segregation was detrimental to African American students • Created a sense of inferiority • Court relied on the findings of social science

  15. Civil Rights Movement in the Courts • 3 – Desegregation versus Integration • South - segregation by law (de jure) was clearly unconstitutional as a result of Brown • North – segregation was the result of residential segregation (de facto) • Integration came to be defined by the Court as a “unitary, nonracial system of education”

  16. Civil Rights Movement in the Courts • Swann V. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971) • Set guidelines for all subsequent cases involving school integration: • To violate the Constitution, a school system must have intended to discriminate • A one-race school creates a presumption of intent to discriminate • Remedies for past discrimination can include quotas, busing and redrawn district lines • Not every school must reflect the racial composition of the entire system

  17. Civil Rights Movement in the Courts • Result of Swann • White flight to suburbs • One issue not settled by Swann • Whether bussing and other remedies should cut across school district lines • Court later ruled that intercity busing could be authorized only if both the city and the suburbs had practiced segregation • Court believed – in some cities there had been intent to segregate and busing was necessary

  18. Civil Rights Movements in Congress • Getting Congress to pass new civil rights laws required a far more difficult and decentralized strategy than campaigning in the federal courts • This part of the movement aimed at: • Mobilizing public opinion • Overcoming the many congressional barriers to action

  19. Civil Rights Movements in Congress • 1st strategy – get civil rights issues on the political agenda by mobilizing public opinion through dramatic events • Sit-ins at segregated lunch counters • “Freedom rides” on segregated bus lines • Made headlines in newspapers 2nd strategy – efforts were made to get blacks registered to vote in counties where whites had used intimidation & harassment to prevent registration of blacks

  20. Civil Rights Movements in Congress Rosa Parks • Started a boycott in Montgomery, AL • Organized by Martin Luther King, Jr. • She refused to surrender her seat to a white man • Early demonstrations were based on the philosophy of nonviolent civil disobedience • Peaceful violation of a law

  21. Civil Rights Movements in Congress • Later, racial violence and riots erupted when more militant organizations became involved in the civil rights movement • This mobilization of public opinion had mixed results • It succeeded in getting civil rights on the national political agenda • Yet, it set back coalition-building because demonstrations and riots were seen as law-breaking by many whites

  22. Civil Rights Movements in Congress • In Congress opponents of civil rights had strong defensive positions • Southern Democrats controlled the House Rules Committee • A filibuster in the Senate occurred when civil rights legislation came to the floor • President Kennedy was reluctant to submit strong civil rights legislation

  23. Civil Rights Movements in Congress • 4 developments changed the civil rights movement’s chances in Congress: • 1 – Public opinion became more favorable toward the movement as the years wore on • 2 – Violent reactions by white segregationists received extensive coverage by the media • 3 – The assassination of President Kennedy (1963) gave his successor, President Johnson, a period of strong relations with Congress and a mythical hero figure to refer to in promoting civil rights

  24. Civil Rights Movements in Congress • The 1964 election was a Democratic landslide that allowed northern Democrats to seize power in Congress • 5 important civil rights bills were passed between 1957-1968 • Significant voting rights laws were passed in 1957 • A housing discrimination law was passed in 1968

  25. Civil Rights Movements in Congress • Civil Rights Act of 1964 • High point of civil rights legislation • Assured equality of opportunity: • Employment • Public accommodations • Voting • Schools • Most important result of civil rights movement • Dramatic rise in African American voting • Changes in the opinions of whites regarding civil rights

  26. Women & Equal Rights • The feminist movement that reappeared in the 1960s questioned the claim that women differed from men in ways that justified differences in legal status • Congress responded by passing laws that required: • Equal pay for equal work • Prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex in employment & public education • Banned discrimination against pregnant women on the job

  27. Women & Equal Rights • Supreme Court had a choice between two standards in considering sex discrimination • 1 – The reasonableness standard • Hold that when the government treats some classes of people different from others, the different treatment must be reasonable, not arbitrary

  28. Women & Equal Rights • 2 – The strict scrutiny standard • Holds that some instances of drawing distinctions between different groups are inherently suspect • This is the standard that used for racial discrimination • Thus, the Court will subject those cases to strict scrutiny to ensure that they are clearly necessary to attain a legitimate state goal

  29. Women & Equal Rights • When women complained that some laws treated them unfairly, the Court adopted a mid-level standard somewhere between the reasonable & strict scrutiny tests • Ex – the courts prohibit gender-based differences when applied to the age of adulthood, drinking age, arbitrary employee height & weight requirements, & mandatory pregnancy leaves

  30. Women & Equal Rights • Gender-based differences are allowed by the courts in areas such as: • Statutory rape • All-boy/all-girl public schools • Delayed promotions in the Navy • The rights of women have been determined by 3 far-reaching areas:

  31. Women & Equal Rights • 1 – The draft • Rostker v. Goldberg (1981) • S.C. held that Congress can require men but not women to register for the draft without violating the due-process clause of the 5th amendment • 1993 – secretary of defense allowed women to have air and sea combat positions but not ground combat positions • These decisions remain controversial

  32. Women & Equal Rights • 2 – Sexual Harassment • 2 forms • 1 – quid pro quo – in which sexual favors are expected in return for holding a job or gaining a promotion • Employers are strictly liable for this form of harassment • 2 – hostile environment – creating a setting in which harassment impairs a person’s ability to work • Employers are liable in this form if they are negligent

  33. Women & Equal Rights • 3 – Abortion • Left to the states until 1973 • Roe v. Wade – S.C. struck down a Texas ban on abortion & all similar state laws • Hold that a woman’s freedom to choose an abortion is protected by the 14th amendment in the 1st trimester of pregnancy • 2nd trimester – also left up to the woman, but states are allowed to pass reasonable regulations to protect mother’s health

  34. Women & Equal Rights • 3rd trimester – states can ban abortion because the fetus is viable • Constitutional amendments to overturn Roe have failed • However, there have been successful attempts to restrict abortions

  35. Women & Equal Rights • 1976 – Congress barred the use of federal funds to pay for abortions except when the life of the mother is at stake • 1989 – The S.C. first upheld the right of states to impose some restrictions on abortion • 1992 – In Casey v. Planned Parenthood the Court permitted more restrictions, such as a 24 hour waiting period & parental consent for teenagers. A spousal consent requirement was overturned

  36. Affirmative Action • The politics of civil rights are expressed in one of two views • 1 – Advocates equality of results • View that assumption is that racism & sexism can be overcome only when remedies change the results • Equal rights are not thought to be enough • People need benefits as well • Argue that affirmative action – preferential practices – should be used in hiring & college admissions decisions

  37. Affirmative Action • 2nd view – advocates equality of opportunities • Believe that reverse discrimination occurs when race or sex is used as a basis for preferential treatment • Laws should be color-blind & sex neutral • Bakke case 1978 – S.C. ruled that numerical minority quotas are not permissible but that race could be considered in admission policies

  38. Affirmative Action • The Court supports the concept of affirmative action, but it is reluctant to support the use of quotas • Court has ruled that affirmative action programs must be “narrowly tailored” to achieve a “compelling goal” • Standards are emerging for quotas & preferences systems, including:

  39. Affirmative Action 1 – Quota systems are subjected to strict scrutiny, and there must be a compelling state interest to justify quotas 2 – Quotas must correct an actual pattern of discrimination 3 – Quotas must identify actual practices that discriminate 4 – Federal quotas will be given deference because the Constitution give Congress greater power to correct the effects of racial discrimination 5 – Preferences are acceptable for the purpose of achieving diversity

  40. Affirmative Action • Public generally supports compensatory action (helping minorities catch up), but not preferential treatment • This is in line with American political culture • Supports individualism but also those in need

  41. Affirmative Action • Conflicts persist in other areas of civil rights • Immigration rights & the rights of enemy combatants are bound to provoke more rulings from the S.C. in the future • An area that is already receiving widespread attention – gay rights • In the past, sexual conduct has been regulated by the states

  42. Affirmative Action • S.C. has overturned some state laws that ban certain sexual practices by citing the privacy rights implied in the 4th & 14th amendments • Yet other ruling have not upheld gay rights • Ex – Boy Scouts’ right to exclude gays • Gay rights remain controversial

More Related