150 likes | 291 Views
WHY EVERYBODY LOVES TO HATE ARBITRATION IN AMERICA: (ONE “DUMB YANK’S” VIEW). © 2010 Andy Douglass*. _________________________________________________________________________________
E N D
WHY EVERYBODY LOVES TO HATE ARBITRATION IN AMERICA:(ONE “DUMB YANK’S” VIEW) © 2010 Andy Douglass* _________________________________________________________________________________ *Since 1997 Andy has been a partner of Morrison Mahoney LLP of New York, Boston and Hartford, a firm specializing in insurance and reinsurance litigation and arbitration. Prior to that he was Senior Vice President & General Counsel of The St. Paul Companies, Inc. and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company.
“EVERYBODY TALKS ABOUT THE WEATHER BUT NOBODY DOES ANYTHING ABOUT IT” (MARK TWAIN)
WHAT PEOPLE DON’T LIKE ABOUT U.S. ARBITRATIONS THE ARBITRATION PROCESS • COST – NO SAVINGS vs LITIGATION • THE AWARDS • HOW DID THE PANEL COME UP WITH THAT NUMBER? SOLOMIC WISDOM, OR LACK THEREOF • 2-1 DECISIONS • CONFIDENTIALITY (LACK THEREOF) • ABOUT THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM • LACK OF PREDICTIBILITY • IDIOT STATE COURT JUDGES • “LIABILITY CATS” • REINSURERS RESPONSE TO SUDDEN BAD NEWS • WILL US AND EUROPEAN COURTS HONOR IDIOTIC U.S. DECISIONS?
THE COST OF ARBITRATIONCOUNSEL AND ARBITRATION FEES“AND SO HE JUMPED ON HIS HORSE AND WENT RIDING OFF IN ALL DIRECTIONS”(Oscar Wilde) • WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM COMES IN • WHAT YOUR LAWYERS DO (PLEASE SEE OSCAR’S OBSERVATION) • WHAT YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE BEFORE YOU EVER PUT THE RISK ON THE BOOKS • THE ROLE OF THE BROKER • PERSONAL DISCLOSURE: MY FATHER WAS A BROKER • BUT HE WAS AN HONEST BROKER • QUESTION: WHY DOES ANY SANE RISK UNDERWRITER ALLOW THE BROKER TO WRITE THE CONTRACT?
MORAL OF STORY: ANY ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS NOT AS GOOD AS ANY OTHER ARBITRATION CLAUSE • WHAT THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE ACTUALLY SAYS MAKES A DIFFERENCE • WHAT THE CHOICE OF LAW CLAUSE ACTUALLY SAYS ALSO MAKES A DIFFERENCE • WHAT THE CHOICE OF FORUM AND CONSENT TO JURISDICTION CLAUSE ACTUALLY SAYS ALSO MAKES A DIFFERENCE • SO DOES PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING ELSE IN THE CONTRACT
WHAT TO DO: • CARPE DIEM • THE “GOLDEN RULE” IN WALL STREET • WHO HAS THE GOLD?
COST: PANEL AWARDS • WHERE IN THE WORLD DID THAT NUMBER COME FROM? • LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY THE EXPERTS • AMERICAN PENCHANT FOR SPLITTING THE BABY • AWARDS OFTEN FOLLOW “MEDIATOR RULE” FOR SETTLING A CLAIM: NOBODY IS HAPPY • WHAT MOTIVATES ARBITRATORS • “BULLET-PROOFING” THE AWARD FROM APPEAL • 3-0 DECISIONS VS 2-1 • SOME OF THE FRUSTRATION IS REALLY FRUSTRATION WITH THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM • SEAT OF THE ARBITRATION AND ITS IMPACT UPON THE AWARD
THE THIRD CONCERN ABOUT ARBITRATION: THE CONFIDENTIALITY STANDARDS • NOBODY SUES TO ENFORCE • INSURANCE PEOPLE LOVE TO GOSSIP • BUT THE CASES DO STAY OUT OF THE TABLOID PRESS • IMPORTANCE OF REPUTATION
A LOT OF WHAT PEOPLE DON’T LIKE ABOUT AMERICAN ARBITRATION IS REALLY BECAUSE THEY DON’T LIKE THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM* _________________________________________________ *THE ERIE RAILROAD AND MR. TOMPKINS
THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM:“DON’T SHOOT ME – I’M ONLY THE PIANO PLAYER”*(OSCAR WILDE) _____________________________________________________ *(ALSO THE TITLE OF A 1970S ELTON JOHN ALBUM)
THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM • LACK OF PREDICTIBILITY • FINDINGS OF FACT (BY JURIES) VERSUS FINDINGS OF LAW (BY JUDGES) • JOE JAMAIL AND PENNZOIL v. TEXACO • PLAINTIFF’S BAR: EVERYTHING THAT IS WRONG WITH MY LIFE IS SOMEONE ELSE’S FAULT • RESULT: CLAIMS BECOME LOTTERY TICKETS • RESULT #2: INSURERS BECOME CASINOS. WHETHER THEY LIKE IT OR NOT. • ULTIMATELY, SANITY MUST PREVAIL (STORY OF ST. PAUL MED MAL CLAIMS IN THE 1980’S.)
AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM • NOT ALL STATE COURT JUDGES ARE IDIOTS • FEDERAL COURTS ARE GENERALLY MORE CAREFUL – BUT MAY NOT HAVE JURISDICTION • INSURANCE AS A SOCIALIZATION OF RISK TECHNIQUE • THIS IS NOT WELL UNDERSTOOD BY JUDGES, MANY OF WHOM WERE PLAINTIFF’S LAWYERS • SECURITIZATION OF PROPERTY RISKS CREATES PAPER THAT PERFORMS LIKE JUNK BONDS • WE’RE IN A WORLD OF LIABILITY CATS* AS WELL • IF WE KEEP ALL THE RISK, OUR COMPANY’S RESULTS WILL PERFORM LIKE JUNK BONDS _____________________________________________ *(The surplus lines writers have known this for generations)
AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM • REINSURERS DON’T LIKE SURPRISES – ESPECIALLY BAD SURPRISES • SO WHY, IN ALL FAIRNESS, SHOULD THEY PICK UP THE COST OF IDIOTIC (MOSTLY STATE) JUDICIAL DECISIONS? • WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? • LEXINGTON V. WASA: THE “IDIOTIC STATE COURT” EXCEPTION
HOW DO CEDENTS GET COVER IN THE FUTURE? • DEMAND NEW YORK LAW AND SEAT OF ARBITRATION? • REINSURERS WOULD HAVE TO ARGEE – NOBODY’S HOLDING A GUN TO YOUR HEAD • ARE YOU GOING TO LET THE BROKER BE YOUR SCRIBE? • NEW YORK LAW ON CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION • ALTERNATELY, WILL LONDON AND THE CONTINENT DEVELOP A “THIS TIME WE REALLY MEAN WE’LL FOLLOW YOUR FORTUNES/SETTLEMENTS” CLAUSE? • WILL CEDENTS SAY, “ONCE BITTEN, TWICE SHY”?
WHAT ABOUT COINSURANCE INSTEAD OF REINSURANCE? • MORE RELIANCE ON EXCESS CARRIERS AND LESS ON REINSURERS? • MORE BUSINESS WRITTEN AS SURPLUS LINES BUSINESS?