1 / 15

“Correction of PM10 measurements: French approach” O. Le Bihan (LCSQA/INERIS) and J. Colosio (ADEME).

11 th EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Assessment and Management, La Rochelle, France, 26-27 October, 2006. “Correction of PM10 measurements: French approach” O. Le Bihan (LCSQA/INERIS) and J. Colosio (ADEME). Correction of PM10 monitoring. The French air quality monitoring system :

aiden
Download Presentation

“Correction of PM10 measurements: French approach” O. Le Bihan (LCSQA/INERIS) and J. Colosio (ADEME).

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 11th EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Assessment and Management, La Rochelle, France, 26-27 October, 2006. “Correction of PM10 measurements: French approach” O. Le Bihan (LCSQA/INERIS) and J. Colosio (ADEME).

  2. Correction of PM10 monitoring • The French air quality monitoring system : • 37 AQ monitoring networks • about 400 automatic measuring stations • Each AQ monitoring network is managed by a non-profit-making association in which are involved representatives from : • the French state, • the local authorities, • Industries, • environmental organisations.

  3. Correction of PM10 monitoring • The correction of PM10 measurements has been a collective decision • Correction using a constant factor (such as 1.3): • No relevant (the relation to the reference method is not stable in time and space) • Consequences : • Annual average values are overestimated, • Creation of wrong LV exceedances, • Results could not be in accordance with the data quality objectives • France has decided to look for an instrumental solution

  4. Correction of PM10 monitoring • The instrumental solution : to carry out special “modules” taking into account the semi-volatile particulate compounds [FDMS (TEOM) or RST (beta gauge)] • Official recognition for these methods: • Demonstration of equivalence scheme: 2 campaigns (Paris2005 / Marseille2006) • Positive results on TEOM-FDMS PM10 and PM2.5; Beta Jauge MP101 Env. SA with RST (24h hours sampling) • EU Workshop, 2007

  5. Example: 2005 « demonstration of equivalence » campaign in ParisFDMS and SRM correlation for PM2.5

  6. Correction of PM10 monitoring • Measuring devices will be fitted gradually, but not every device • We have to correct the results provided by measuring instruments without module

  7. Correction of PM10 monitoring • Assumption: the monitoring of volatile compounds does not have only a “local” signification • Method planned for correction (first step): • We will set up « reference » stations with 2 measuring devices : one without module and the other with module (e.g. TEOM 50°C and TEOM_FDMS) • On each reference station, calculation of the difference between the 2 results (e.g. TEOM_FDMS - TEOM50°C ) • This difference will be added to the results provided by the devices without module located near the reference station

  8. Correction of PM10 monitoring • Future “reference” stations

  9. Correction of PM10 monitoring • Results will be corrected taking into account the following issues : • Data registered at the local level and at the national level must be the same • Implementation of correction by the 1st of January 2007 • Correction must not introduce inconsistency between stations fitted with modules (no correction) and the others without module • Good quality of the correction

  10. Correction of PM10 monitoring • This method will be improved (second step): • The number of reference stations will be increased over several years until the optimal situation • Experience will allow to improve quality of correction

  11. 11th EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Assessment and Management, La Rochelle, France, 26-27 October, 2006 Correction of PM10 measurements: implementation Département Surveillance de la Qualité de l’Air Joëlle COLOSIO

  12. Technical organisation 37 local networks 37 local databases 2 softwares local station (400 stations for PM 10) Automatic devices TEOM : 320 Beta Gauge : 80 PM2.5 : 80 stations TEOM National database

  13. Delay : 01 01 2007 • Implement the technical solution : • Installation of References stations : 1 minimum by network = 45 • Link the PM sites to the most appropriate Reference Station • Implementation of the correction module in 37 networks database • Implementation in the national Database in ADEME Total cost : 300 k€

  14. Reference station [TEOM] ] Correction factor calculated for every 1/4H data with the 16 1/4h previous data [TEOM FDMS] other station National database : Teom Teom FDMS Ajusted Teom [TEOM] [TEOM] [TEOM] [TEOM] [TEOM] [TEOM] [TEOM] [TEOM] For other PM sites the correction is implemented for the corresponding 1/4h measurement in the software Just before the validation

  15. Many thanks to... • The members of the French WG “particles” • AASQA : Airparif, Airmaraix, etc... • Ecomesure, Environnement SA • European partners : RIVM, VMM, ISSeP, JRC Ispra, LUA, CSIC, EMPA.

More Related