1 / 62

LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-1

LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-1. Collimator Design Review 01/04/09. Introductory Statements. Your comments and/or questions are welcome at any time . There will also be time at the end for an in-depth discussion of any and all aspects of our design. Sub-title of this talk :

Download Presentation

LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-1 Collimator Design Review 01/04/09

  2. Introductory Statements • Your comments and/or questions are welcome at any time . There will also be time at the end for an in-depth discussion of any and all aspects of our design. • Sub-title of this talk : • “The Rotatable Collimator from the inside out” • Basic format I hope to follow: • Internal component detail (CAD models and photos of real pieces (RC-0 / RC-1) • Fabrication photos of components of the RC-0 Jaw aka Heater test Jaw. • Fabrication photos of some of the RC-1 components that are currently in work. • Specifications and physics requirements and how we meet them.

  3. Collimator Jaw-Hub-Shaft Concept Jaw heats up along the side facing the beam and lengthens causing each end to deflect away from the beam and into the 2mm annular gap between the Shaft and the Jaw. The Jaw also swells a bit causing the Jaw face move towards the beam.

  4. Some Calculations • Jaw heating and deflection characteristics for • Steady State (SS) and Transient (TR) conditions • Component SS TR units • Max jaw temp 70.6 224 C • Max deflection toward beam 105 365 μ m • Surface Sagitta 226 880 μ m • Effective length 0.67 0.33 m • Water temp rise 20.3 C • Water pressure drop 2.4 bar

  5. Cutaway of Jaw Assembly

  6. RC-1 Half Shaft and Hub Assembly This Outer Keeper Ring is machined off after brazing in order for Shaft to pass through Mandrel ID Cu-Au alloy braze wire This Outer Keeper Ring acts as a stop to position the Shaft longitudinally Outer Keeper Ring Keeps moly outer finger tips from splaying out and away from Glidcop during brazing Inner Keeper Ring Forces moly inner fingers to keep up with Glidcop expansion during brazing

  7. RC-1 Molybdenum Shafts

  8. Details of Ends of Molybdenum Half Shaft

  9. RC-1 Hollow Glidcop Hub (prior to Cu plating & grooving)

  10. Grooving details of Glidcop Hub

  11. RC-0 Half Shaft and Half Hub Brazing The two Half Hubs are now one. We originally needed to machine out a copper inner keeper plug that forced the moly fingers out with the Glidcop during brazing to provide an opening for the tubing. RC-1 uses a thinner SST ring that can remain inside the Shaft with room for the tubes to pass through.

  12. Mandrel with Cooling Tube

  13. RC-0 Mandrel at QC

  14. RC-1 Mandrel in work

  15. RC-1 Mandrel almost finished (March 15th)

  16. No Vacuum to Water Joints Tubing is wound into Mandrel groove while free ends pass through the hollow center parallel to each other yet exiting on Shaft centerline. When Collimator rotates the tubes twist on their own axis but not around each other.

  17. Tubing coil on turntable for winding 16m of tubing are removed from “loose coils” and placed on a turntable for payout.

  18. Winding tubing on the RC-0 Mandrel

  19. Nearing the end or… forming the bend

  20. RC-0 Mandrel Brazing Setup

  21. Machining the RC-0 Mandrel to size

  22. Collimator Jaw Brazed to Mandrel • RC-1 Jaw has 5 cylindrical sections. • End sections are tapered. • RC-0 has 16 quarter sections, none are tapered. • The RC-0 Jaw to Mandrel fit up for brazing was quite time consuming & expensive. • Each quarter section had to be reworked to fit Mandrel final diameter! • Changing to full cylinders, to save time & cost, meant they should be a somewhat shorter to be easier to slide over the Mandrel with the tight brazing tolerances. • Robustness test will use 1 RC-0 and 1 RC-1 style Jaw

  23. 16 Jaw Quarters with Cu/Au alloy foils

  24. Jaw Braze preps continue

  25. RC-0 Jaw Brazing Success

  26. RC-1 Jaw braze Assembly

  27. Section of Revised Jaw Cu-Au braze wire go here ~ 40 snap rings Braze wires replace foils simplifying braze preps

  28. RC-1 Final Machining

  29. 20 Facets 20 years? 20.25mm ~15 degree taper at each end places RF contact bearings ~10mm away from facet. Facet length = 930mm (oal) – 2x38mm (taper) = 854mm Taper may be too generous and could be shortened for a longer facet. Thickness of Glidcop Jaw (facet to water) is 24.5mm.

  30. Facet Flatness • Flatness Specification is 25 microns over full length of Jaw. • How did we do? • How we can do even better!

  31. Jaw Facet Preliminary measurement for end-to- end flatness

  32. Up Beam end Jaw Support Version 1 Diaphragm allows Jaw end-to-end offset and Shaft sag. Flex vanes compensate (along with the diaphragm) for Shaft expansion

  33. Jaw Support Development • A few thoughts: • Rigid mount would hold drive gearing in alignment with Shaft. • This would require a flexible connection to the shaft to allow for deflection (sag) due to gravity and Jaw end-to-end offset. • Or a spherical bearing. At the time we were unable to locate a full complement ceramic spherical bearing set. • So… A diaphragm was introduced to attach the gear to the Shaft. • This diaphragm, if designed correctly, should be able to distort not only for the angles but for the change in length of the Shaft due to thermal effects. • Eventually it was determined that the End Support would need to flex to help the diaphragm absorb the longitudinal expansion. Version 1 was designed. • Finally the current version combines the diaphragm angular distortions with the flexibility of the original End Support. • The final hurdle is to find an acceptable high strength stainless steel to fabricate it from.

  34. Up Beam Jaw Support Current Version

  35. Down Beam Jaw Support Current Version 100 1 mm dia. ceramic ball bearings roll between these two races

  36. Cutaway of Jam Nut and Support 100 1mm dia. Ball bearings roll in “V” groove Rotation Mechanism mounts to tab on bearing race Jam Nuts mate at beveled surfaces to strengthen tip of Support

  37. Outboard Bearing Race/Axle Buttress Threads 100 1mm ceramic ball bearings roll here

  38. Inboard Bearing Race w/gear Drive mounting tab Bearings roll here

  39. Jam Nut Two of these lock Collimator Jaw to the End Support

  40. Shaft Ends are grooved for ceramic ball bearings Ceramic bearings roll here and at far end

  41. Shaft End bearing groove details Bearings roll here

  42. Jaw End Support System w/cooling tube ~100 1mm dia. ball bearings in End adapter for rotation (Bellows removed to show support detail) Jaw Shaft End rests in slot of Support and is held by jam nuts on either side Flexible support is high strength stainless steel welded to bottom of bellows cuff at assembly to Tank Base Plate Bellows mounting to Drive is unchanged from CERN design Cooling tube adapter is tig welded after Jaw is installed in Tank “Beefed-up” design still permits Jaw end-to-end offsets (3mm), Shaft thermal expansion and static sag. Deflection is improved for non-horizontal collimator positions.

  43. Jaw Rotator/Gear Drive Accuracy • Jaw face alignment specification dictates an indexing type of mechanism. This drive allows up to 8 mis-counts of drive motor steps before Jaw moves off position. • 2x1 bevel reduction in combination with 80 x1 worm reduces side load on drive and support to a minimum level. • Worm also provides locking of Jaw. • Backlash is a minimized due to tubing torque load

  44. Indexing the Collimator Jaw • Indexing can be 1 facet, 5 facets for 90 degrees, 10 facets for 180 degrees. • For a distortion of Jaw in the plane of the beam a 90 degree advance would render the distortion a non-problem. • After a 180 degree advance a subsequent hit might correct the distortion, if a were of the same magnitude. • Following a sequence of 10 facets (180 degrees), 1 facet then 10 facets, a total of 5.25 twists of the tubing would be needed to “use up” all 20 facets. • Tubing was twisted an equivalent of 8 times. • No visible defects observed.

  45. Twisted Hollow Copper 10mm x 7mm

  46. Ratchet actuation conceptual arrangement Wire Springs restore Hammer after ratchet movement Hammer contacts here during over-travel of Jaw

  47. Jaw End Details for Image Current connection Bearing races fit in recess here 300 Rhodium Plated stainless steel ball bearings roll here

  48. Image Current Bearing Race (example) Glidcop Ring details are similar for both races

  49. Image Current Foil Assembly Version 1 This surface mounts to bearing race Height of parts was necessary to shadow the Gear Drive on top of Jaw End Support

  50. Current Version of Foil Assembly Temp sensor mounts here Reduced height of foil is minimum to shadow “Geneva”

More Related