1 / 1

Expression of SlNADP-ME Genes During Tomato Ripening

This figure illustrates the abundance of NADP-ME2, NADPH-ME3, and NADPH-ME4 mRNAs in tomatoes at different ripening stages (breaker, breaker + 5 DAP, and breaker + 10 DAP). Data was obtained using quantitative RT-PCR, with values presented as means ± SE of six plants per line. Asterisks denote significant differences of transgenic lines against the WT at each stage. Different letters indicate significant differences within the WT line across ripening stages. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey HSD test adjusted to 95% significance level.

willem
Download Presentation

Expression of SlNADP-ME Genes During Tomato Ripening

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Supplemental Figure 1. Expression of SlNADP-MEs genesduring ripening. The abundance of NADP-ME2(acc. number AF001270),NADPH-ME3(acc. number Solyc03g120990), and NADPH-ME4(acc. number Solyc08g066290) mRNAs were measured by quantitative RT-PCR, respectively. The ripening stages were as follows: breaker, breaker + 5 DAP, and breaker + 10 DAP. Values are presented as means ± SE of six individual plants per line. Asterisks indicate significant differences of transgenic lines against the WT for each stage using the ANOVA and Tukey HSD test adjusted to 95% significant level. Different letters indicate significant differences within the WT line in the different ripening stages, using the ANOVA and Tukey HSD test adjusted to 95% significant level.

More Related