1 / 15

The Evolution of Social Structure: Why Biology Matters.

The Evolution of Social Structure: Why Biology Matters. Pierce, B. & White, R. (1999). The evolution of social structure: why biology matters. Academy of Management Review, 24, 843-853. Video. video clip. Introduction.

Download Presentation

The Evolution of Social Structure: Why Biology Matters.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Evolution of Social Structure: Why Biology Matters. Pierce, B. & White, R. (1999). The evolution of social structure: why biology matters. Academy of Management Review, 24, 843-853.

  2. Video • video clip

  3. Introduction • Human behavior, including social behavior, is a result of the interplay between perceived environmental cues and innate psychological mechanisms • Our evolutionary ancestors have been members of social groups for millions of years • Psychological mechanisms that helped our ancestors solve survival problems have become encoded genetically • These innate mechanisms continue to influence our social behavior today

  4. These does not mean that our behavior is predetermined • Rather human behavior is very flexible because these innate mechanisms are domain specific—tailored to solve specific problems and activated only when certain cues are perceived

  5. Social Structure • Agonic Mode • Stable troops of dominant and submissive members that travel together • Those who attain and maintain dominance do so through obvert acts and displays of aggression • Members of the group keep their attention on the dominants • When danger threatens, members look to dominant for protection

  6. Social Structure • Hedonic Mode • Behavior is much more flexible • Members split into small foraging groups • Rank is not rigid • When danger threatens, members group together for protection

  7. Why would there be two distinct social structures within the same species? • Type of structure is dependent upon resource context • There are four characteristics of resource context that are constantly linked to social behavior

  8. Resource Context • Distribution • When resources are clumped together, animals tend to be more aggressive • Visibility • High visibility (savannas) encourages competitive behavior • Low visibility allows animals to forage without worrying about competitors

  9. Resource Context • Predictability • When resources are highly predictable, animals forage in large groups and behave in an agonic manner • When resources are less predictable, animals scatter into small groups or even forage alone • Timing • When animals do not wait to consume their resources, they are more aggressive • When they delay their consumption, they show less competitive behavior

  10. Parallels in Human Behavior • Mechanistic Human Organizations • Hierarchical • Importance of control, authority, and rank • Similar to the agonic mode • Organic Systems • Stratified, but nonhierarchical • Authority flows depending on task at hand • Similar to hedonic mode

  11. Implications • Even though we no longer live on the savanna, our innate mechanisms may influence us to behave as though we do • Employers have the ability to produce a certain type of working atmosphere is they utilize one of these modes • We are social beings, always have been and always will be

  12. Limitations of Article • Even though the authors made a connection between the social structures of our evolutionary ancestors and the work place today, it could have been more defined. • Relied too much on outside research. • It could have incorporated more studies concerning human social structure today.

  13. 3 Interesting Findings • “Our ancestors have been members of social groups and engaged in social interaction for millions and probably tens of millions of years.” • Despite the variability of the resource context, it is apparent that our ancestors grouped together in some fashion. This displays the very important survival function of a group. • Even in the complex world of today, where the resource context is much different from that of our ancestors, humans undoubtedly form groups in order to better their lives. • According to Harvard professor Robert Putnam, social isolation may be as big of a risk factor for death as smoking— it may even be bigger.

  14. Test Questions • Which is NOT a characteristic of resource context? • Timing • Visibility • Amount • Having innate psychological mechanisms means that • Humans have no free will • Humans act like monkeys • Humans are influenced by their evolutionary ancestors • If an employer wanted to promote a free-flowing, nonhierarchical working environment, he should try to simulate a _______ atmosphere • Organic • Mechanistic

  15. True/False • Evolved psychological mechanisms are domain specific. • Our evolutionary ancestors were not social beings. • More than one type of social structure can be found in a single species.

More Related