1 / 9

Excelsior Energy’s Mesaba Energy Project

Excelsior Energy’s Mesaba Energy Project. Update for the NM-SPG May 5, 2005. MISO Generator Interconnection Requested mid-Oct 2004. PROJECT G477 Queue Number 38280-01 For first unit of 530/550MW in Spring 2010

ulani
Download Presentation

Excelsior Energy’s Mesaba Energy Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Excelsior Energy’sMesaba Energy Project Update for the NM-SPG May 5, 2005

  2. MISO Generator Interconnection Requested mid-Oct 2004 • PROJECT G477 • Queue Number 38280-01 • For first unit of 530/550MW in Spring 2010 • Project location is Cliffs-Erie property (old LTV mining site) north of Hoyt Lakes, MN • POI is proposed as Forbes 230KV bus • For network resource service

  3. Phase IMISO Feasibility Study Completed mid-March 2005 • Preliminary screening study of the generator interconnection to the existingsystem • Includes powerflow, transfer capability, and short circuit analysis but no stability analysis • 2009 summer peak powerflow model including: • A-W Project • Proposed area generators higher in the MISO queue • Mesaba Unit 1 • Forbes 230kV POI • 345kV outlet line and 345/230kV autotransformer at Forbes • Study Participants: ATC, GRE, MH, MP, OTP, Xcel

  4. MISO Feasibility Study Results • No fatal flaws or insurmountable problems with interconnection to Forbes 230kV bus • Some transfer capability exists • could be as lower as 90MW • or over 300MW • Six Forbes 115kV breakers over-duty

  5. MISO Feasibility StudyModeling Issues • How higher queued generators are represented • i.e. generator upgrades- transmission system changes to mitigate adverse impacts • Manitoba Hydro system high voltage in base case • How power delivery was sinked into Xcel control area • A number of existing underlying system facilities (115-230kV) are near or over their ratings in the base case • Need to be evaluated and resolved whether MEP proceeds or not

  6. Phase IIMISO System Impact Study (SIS) • Rigorous powerflow, short circuit and stability analysis • Studied for both peak and off-peak load under a variety of severely stressed conditions • Consistent with applicable Reliability Standards • Includes new Deliverability Analysis

  7. Phase IIMISO System Impact Study (SIS) • Kick off meeting set for May 11 at MISO St. Paul Offices • Same study participants • PTI continuing as MISO contractor

  8. Phase IIMISO System Impact Study (SIS) • Excelsior’s desired outcome---- • that the study process continues beyond just the identification of potential problem areas caused by the project interconnection and/or operation at full output • to the development of a robust regional solution(s) so that the likely purchasers of long term power from the project (load serving entities in MN) can designate the project as a new network resource and • have some confidence that sufficient facilities will be put in place to minimize the potential for unit output being constrained.

  9. Questions??Feedback??

More Related