1 / 28

Energy Use in Distillation Operation: Nonlinear Economic Effects

Energy Use in Distillation Operation: Nonlinear Economic Effects. IETC 2010 Spring Meeting. Presenter. Doug White Principal Consultant PlantWeb Solutions Group Emerson Process Management Houston, Texas. Distillation Energy Impact.

shepry
Download Presentation

Energy Use in Distillation Operation: Nonlinear Economic Effects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Energy Use in Distillation Operation: Nonlinear Economic Effects IETC 2010 SpringMeeting

  2. Presenter Doug White Principal Consultant PlantWeb Solutions Group Emerson Process Management Houston, Texas

  3. Distillation Energy Impact • Over 40000 distillation/ fractionation columns in the US alone • Consume 40% - 60% of the total energy used in chemical and refining plants • Consume 19% of the total energy used in manufacturing plants in the US Reference: Office of Industrial Technology:Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy;US Department of EnergyWashington, DC“Distillation Column Modeling Tools”

  4. Presentation Objectives • Present general approaches to saving energy in fractionation/ distillation through improved control • Present techniques for economic analysis that recognize non-linear character of distillation operation and effects of product blending

  5. Typical Distillation Column PC CW Gas FC LC FC Feed, F Reflux,R Distillate, D AR TC Steam FC LC Reboiler,E Bottoms, B AC

  6. Traditional Control Benefit Analysis Specification Limit ProductComposition($/ DayProfit) Operating Targets Improved Profit By Changing Target Better Control, ReducedVariability Poor Control Time When is this valid? When is it not?

  7. Representation of Variability Gaussian Distribution Specification Limit Mean Frequency of Occurrence ProductComposition Time Composition

  8. Effect of Variability – Linear Objective Function Expected Values ValuationFunction Move AverageCloser ToLimit ToIncreaseValue Product Value;$/ Day Limit ProjectedDistribution OriginalDistribution Composition No Benefit For Better Control At Constant Setpoint!

  9. Case Study – Debutanizer Column PC FC LC Distillate, D< 3%C5 ;$60/ Bbl>3%C5; $40/ Bbl FC Feed, F20,000 BPD$60/ Bbl Reflux,R AR C3 – 25%nC4 – 25% nC5 – 25%nC6 – 25% TC Steam FC 15$/MMBTU LC Reboiler,E Bottoms, B<5%C4; $80/ Bbl> 5%C4; $60/ Bbl AC

  10. Case Study – Typical Tiered Pricing With Composition < 3%C5; $60/ Bbl On - Spec Product Off - Spec Product >3%C5; $40/ Bbl On - Spec Product < 5%C4; $80/ Bbl Off - Spec Product > 5%C4; $60/ Bbl

  11. Impact of Material Balance Variability

  12. Operating Margin – Bottoms Compositional Change – Constant Reflux – No Control Variability Top ProductOn Spec Bottom ProductOff Spec

  13. Operating Margin – Control Variability Impact – Base Case Initial Mean Value Spec Initial Operating Target Initial Variability

  14. Operating Margin – Improved Control – Reduced Variability Case NewMean Value IncreasedMargin Spec ImprovedControlYields ValueAt ConstantSetpoint! Same Operating Target NewVariability

  15. Operating Margin – Optimum Target Composition Versus Control Performance Std Dev Optimum Setpoint 0.0 0.1 0.2 Optimum Target For CompositionVaries with Control Performance and is NOT at the limit! 0.3 0.4

  16. Energy Balance Control

  17. Distillation – Energy and Margin Product Value,$/day High Energy Cost, $/day Operating Margin, $/ Day Low Energy Cost, $/day Low Energy Cost Margin $/day High Energy Cost Margin$/day Low Energy Cost Optimum Min Reflux High PuritySpecifications High Energy Cost Optimum Reflux/Reboiler

  18. Energy Cost versus Reflux Change – Constant Bottom Composition

  19. Operating Margin – Optimum with Varying Energy Pricing Top Product Specification Limit Control Target Changes from Composition To Reflux (Energy) Depending on Relative Prices

  20. Energy Cost ExpectedValue Probability Distribution More Pure Composition Less Pure Non-Linear Objective Functions – Impact of Variability For nonlinear relationship, the expected value of the energy cost is NOT at the value equivalent to the median of the composition; It’s value depends on the standard deviation of the composition

  21. Energy Cost – Effect of Control Variability Initial Mean Value NewMean Value ReducedEnergy Initial Variability NewVariability

  22. Column Product Shipped Product Effect of Blending Proposition: Since actual specification is on shipped product rather than column product directly, small excursions over the specification don’t matter and can be handled by blending.Is this correct?

  23. Energy Cost – Impact of Control Performance Better ControlPerformancePays Even With Blending

  24. Pressure Effects

  25. Energy Cost – Operating Pressure Impact – Constant Top and Bottom Product Compositions

  26. Non – Symmetric Distributions

  27. High Purity Columns Often Have Non- Symmetric Compositional Distributions. Aromatics Column Data Data Gumbel Gaussian Gumbel is a twoparameter statisticaldistribution which often fits non-symmetric data well

  28. Summary – Distillation Economics - Conclusions • For practical cases with tiered product pricing the optimum composition target may not be at the maximum impurity limit • The optimum energy usage depends on energy pricing and may be shift from constrained to unconstrained • Even with product blending there is an incentive for better control performance • Minimizing pressure continues to have value for many separations • High purity columns often have non-symmetric compositional distributions – require special statistical analysis beyond Gaussian distribution assumptions

More Related