1 / 16

Achievements in Wildland Fire Risk Mapping

This symposium discusses the state of the art in wildland fire risk mapping, common methods for mapping fire danger, and the design of an Euro-Mediterranean Fire Danger Rating System.

shannonv
Download Presentation

Achievements in Wildland Fire Risk Mapping

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Achievements in Wildland Fire Risk Mapping Acquis enCartographiedu Risque d’Incendies de Forêt EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  2. Wildland Fire Risk Mapping • Deliverables • Wildland fire danger and hazards: a state of the art • Common methods for mapping the wildland fire danger • Towards an Euro-Mediterranean Wildland Fire Danger Rating System • Objectives • Analyse the structure of existing wildland fire danger indexes • Design an Euro-Mediterranean Fire Danger Rating System EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  3. Wildland Fire Danger and Hazards: a state of the art (D-08-02, D-08-07) • Wildland fire structure and terminology on fire risk • Fire risk issues • Temporal and spatial issues • Fire management and risk assessment • Risk variables • Vegetation • Climatic and meteorological • Topography • Anthropogenic variables EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  4. Common methods for mappingthe wildland fire danger (D-08-05) • Methods for wildland fire risk mapping • Dynamic fire risk indices • Static-structural danger indices • Operationally applied methods for fire danger estimation in Mediterranean countries • Short-term • Long-term • Inventory of existing databases • Cartographic interfaces for the dissemination of fire danger indices EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  5. Scheme of the Euro-Mediterranean Wildland Fire Risk Index (EM-WFRI) (D-08-03, D-08-06) Satellite index Fuel moisture Ignition Danger Index Meteo Index Probability of ignition (human factors) Human ignition Fuel properties Wind flows Propagation Danger Index EM - WFRI Topography Population exposition Environmental value Vulnerability Index Economic value Potential soil erosion EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  6. Fuel Moisture (Satellite Information) y = 0.9525x - 3.8232 2 Grasslands Ávila-Segovia R = 0.9053 350 300 250 200 Estimated 150 100 50 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Observed FMCg = -57.103 + 284.808 x NDVI – 0.089 x ST + 136.75 x FDg FMCc = 70.195 + 53.520 x NDVI – 1.435 x ST + 122.087 x FDc (a) (b) Live fuel moisture content map (August, 10th; 2004) Observed and estimated FMC values for grasslands (a) and C. ladanifer (b). EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  7. Fuel moisture(Meteorological Index) • Correlation between meteorological variables and environmental and topographic variables: • elevation ( r -0.72/-0.97), • aspect (r -0.34/-0.53), • slope (r -0.44/-0.70), • sea distance (-0.40/-0.93) • Multiple regression: • r 0.97 for minimum and maximum temperature of January and July • Spatial interpolation of meteorological index value: • Interpolation of the meteorological parameters of the index (temperature, wind…) • Interpolation of the meteorological index EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  8. Spatial interpolation of meteorological risk index (c) (a) * Interpolation of meteorological risk index: a) high resolution -50 x 50 m- b) low resolution -1 x 1 km- * Meteorological risk index from interpolated variables: c) high resolution -50 x 50 m- (b) EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  9. Probability of Ignition(Human Factors) Landuse types Urban density Road network Structural forest fire ignition risk EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  10. Probability of Ignition(Human Factors: occurrence) EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  11. Scheme of the Euro-Mediterranean Wildland Fire Risk Index (EM-WFRI) Satellite index Fuel moisture Ignition Danger Index Meteo Index Probability of ignition (human factors) Human ignition Fuel properties Wind flows Propagation Danger Index EM - WFRI Topography Population exposition Environmental value Vulnerability Index Economic value Potential soil erosion EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  12. Propagation Danger Index Rate of Spread (RS) Propagation Danger Index (PDI) Flame Length (FL) EU SPREAD Project, 2004 EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  13. Vulnerability Index: Environmental value • Landscape Value: • Singularity • Diversity • Connectivity • ...... CORINE LAND COVER Environmental Value • Ecological • Value: • Natural protected areas • Habitat of importance • ..... NATURA 2000 NETWORK EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  14. Vulnerability Index: Potential soil erosion Coefficients ascribed to the four soil erosion factors used to estimate erosion risk Erosion Index = Slope * Vegetation density * Fire severity * Soil erodibility Low ≤ 5; Intermediate 6 – 15; High 16-26; Very high ≥ 27 EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  15. Vulnerability Index: Potential soil erosion Slope Vegetation density Fire severity Soil erodibility EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

  16. Conclusions • * The components and structure of a risk index have been identified. • Several examples have been shown to demonstrate their efficiency. • The remaining challenge is to acquire better data necessary for risk estimation at the European scale. • * A GIS can be easily used for the generation and integration of the variables, and a map web server could be used for the distribution of the data and presentation of the risk. • * Two scales must be considered independently: • The European scale provides deciders with a global vision of the risk. • The local scale provides an operational basis upon which local foresters and firemen can make practical decisions. EUFIRELAB, Symposium conclusif, Conclusive symposium, Avignon, 20/10/2006

More Related