1 / 18

Canadians and Wildland Fire: A Shared Risk

Canadians and Wildland Fire: A Shared Risk. A Proposed Comprehensive Assessment of Current and Future Options. Presentation Overview. Federal government interests in wildland fires Canadians at risk from wildfire Current situation Current practices Limitations Risk trends

teness
Download Presentation

Canadians and Wildland Fire: A Shared Risk

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Canadians and Wildland Fire: A Shared Risk A Proposed Comprehensive Assessment of Current and Future Options

  2. Presentation Overview • Federal government interests in wildland fires • Canadians at risk from wildfire • Current situation • Current practices • Limitations • Risk trends • Proposal for a national analysis towards a new paradigm based on risk management and hazard mitigation

  3. Wildland Fire: Federal Interests Safety of Canadians and Communities • The 2003 wildfires had an unprecedented impact on the citizens of Canada • Example: British Columbia • 38 communities at risk • 300+ homes lost • 30,000+ residents evacuated • Personal property damage > $100 M • Federal disaster relief payment could exceed $200M

  4. Wildland Fire: Federal Interests Federal Involvement in Forest Fires • Parks Canada – responsible for fire management • DND – emergency assistance; suppression agreements on DND lands • OCIPEP – disaster relief payments • Indian and Northern Affairs – suppression agreements on First Nations lands • Environment Canada – meteorological services • NRCan-CFS • S&T • National information monitoring • Fire behaviour expertise • Major contributor (1/3rd) to CIFFC

  5. Wildland Fire: Federal Interests • International Issues • International agreements on climate change, biodiversity, indicators of sustainability • Smoke transport trans-border (US relations) • Forest sector competitiveness influenced due to impacts on wood supply • Health • Air and water quality • National Issues • CCFM (5-Point Plan) • SK Crown Investment Corporation • CIFFC BoCT

  6. Wildland Fire: Federal Interests • Relevance to Speech from the Throne • Communities • Aboriginals • Science and Technology • Building a 21st Century Economy • Sustainable Development/Climate Change “Safeguarding our natural environment - in the here and now, and for generations to come - is one of the great responsibilities of citizens and governments in the 21st century.” SFT 2004

  7. Fires larger than 200 ha - 1980-89 Canadians at Risk from Wildfire • Current Situation • Number of fires = 8500 fires/yr • Area burned - 2.5 million ha/yr • (highly episodic 0.3M-7.5M/yr) • Large fires dominate landscape • (3% > 200 ha = 97% area burned and 80% of cost) • Fire management expenditures = $500M-900M/year in Canada • Individual agency expenditures can vary >5-fold from year to year • Wildfires contribute a significant proportion to Canada’s GHG emissions (upto 80% of fossil fuel emissions in extreme years)

  8. Canadians at Risk from Wildfire • Wildland-Urban Interface fires • influence thousands of Canadians each year • have significant social and economic impacts • potential for loss of life is rising • Some Recent Incidents • Kelowna/Barriere, BC (2003) • Hillcrest/Blairmore, AB (2003) • Turtle Lake, SK (2002) • Chisholm, AB (2001) • Burwash Landing, YK (1999) • La Ronge, SK (1999) • Beardmore, ON (1999) • Shelburne County, NS (1999) • Badger, NF (1999) • Salmon Arm, BC (1998) • Swan Hills, AB (1998) • Granum, AB (1997) • Timmins, ON (1997) • Ft. Norman, NT (1995) • N&S Manitoba (1989) Aboriginal communities are particularly vulnerable

  9. Canadians at Risk from Wildfire Current Response • Municipalities are responsible for wildfire suppression in rural and urban areas • Crown land • Provinces and territories • Federal gov’t (Parks Canada, INAC, DND, OCIPEP (during emergencies)) • All agencies have policies to protect life, property, and natural resources (but order of importance varies) • Filmon Report on 2003 BC Wildfires indicates a need to move beyond suppression to hazard mitigation and risk management • California – Governor’s Blue Ribbon Commission focusing primarily on changing land management practices

  10. Level of Protection Analysis For Ontario Low fixed cost High fixed cost Canadians at Risk from Wildfire Current Response - Limitations Fire suppression is approaching its limit of economic and physical effectiveness 2-4% of wildfires will continue to escape initial attack

  11. Canadians at Risk from Wildfire Current Response - Limitations • Policies are primarily reactive and tactical based on technical knowledge and experience in wildfire suppression • Limited focus on managing risk in a strategic and integrated manner (e.g., building codes, municipal zoning, land-use planning) • Capabilities and equipment of fire management agencies/organizations varies considerably • Relief payments to Canadians impacted by disasters may actually increase risk (moral hazard)

  12. Risk Trends • Social and Economic • Faster population growth in wildland-urban interface areas • Increased smoke impact on health • Spiraling and more variable fire management costs • Reduced wood supply • Increased likelihood of “company ending events”

  13. Annual Area Burned (%) 1959-99 Risk Trends Climate Change – 50% increase in forest fire activity is projected by 2050 “hot spots” are likely to get hotter • Longer fire season • More extreme fire weather/danger • Heavier fuel loads • Increased ignitions (lightning and human-caused) • More extreme fire behaviour (higher fire intensity, more crowning) • More escape wildfires • Larger area burned

  14. Examples of Key Questions • Are current government expenditures having the maximum possible impact? • What are the true costs of forest fires on industry and the economy? • What are the social costs associated with property and income losses and health effects from smoke? • Are provincial and federal policies and roles adequate to deal with the challenge of balancing the social, economic, and ecological impacts of fire? • Are there ways to share the risk associated with wildland-urban interface fires? • Can hazard mitigation strategies be used to proactively reduce the threats posed by wildfires?

  15. Proposal NRCan-CFS lead a national analysis of wildfire management in Canada resulting in the production of a Green Paper • Purpose - examine and develop options to reduce the risk from wildfire to Canadians • Elements of the analysis and discussion paper would include: • Adequacy of current policies • Detailed assessment of risk trends to Canadians • Condition of the current infrastructure • Economics of wildfire management • Evaluation of other risk management and hazard mitigation models • Options for improvement

  16. Preliminary Thoughts Considerations • Shift mindset from suppression to hazard mitigation • Focus on risk management (linked to levels of responsibility) • Enhance financial planning, accountability, and sustainability • Incorporate best practices from around the world

  17. Moving Forward - Phased Approach • Preliminary discussions with other federal departments • Assemble background information on state of the current policies, infrastructure, and science • Engage in a dialogue with provinces and territories (CCFM DMs meeting in June) • Expand discussions to include municipalities and industries • Complete analysis and produce Green Paper • Facilitate national discussion

  18. Discussion

More Related