1 / 35

New Zealand E-Learning Capability Determination

This research explores the e-learning capability of New Zealand tertiary institutions through the application of an E-Learning Maturity Model. It highlights the project's goals, evaluates current sector practices, and proposes future directions for improving technology use in education. Supported by the New Zealand Ministry of Education, the study emphasizes how institutions can foster effective teaching and learning environments, ensuring successful integration of e-learning techniques that adapt to diverse student needs.

ramla
Download Presentation

New Zealand E-Learning Capability Determination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NZ E-Learning Capability Determination Determination of New Zealand Tertiary Institution E-Learning Capability: An Application of an E-Learning Maturity Model New Zealand E-Learning Capability Determination Dr Stephen Marshall Stephen.Marshall@vuw.ac.nz University Teaching Development Centre Victoria University of Wellington This research is supported by the New Zealand Ministry of Education Tertiary E-Learning Research Fund.

  2. Overview • Goals of the Project • E-Learning Maturity Model • Results of Sector Evaluation • Future Directions • Questions NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  3. How can Institutions help teaching staff to be more successful in their use of technology to support student learning? NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  4. Goal “The answer to large-scale reform is not to try to emulate the characteristics of the minority who are getting somewhere under present conditions … Rather, we must change existing conditions so that it is normal and possible for a majority of people to move forward” (Fullan, 2001, p268) NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  5. Relational model of teaching and learning - Hall and Kidman (1996) NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  6. Relational model of teaching and learning - Hall and Kidman (1996) NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  7. Relational model of teaching and learning - Hall and Kidman (1996) NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  8. How to improve the institutional context… • Are there common practices that lead to effective adoption and support ofe-learning? • For example: • Institutional vision and e-learning strategy? • Standards based technical environment? • Centralised/decentralised support? • Catalogue of successful solutions?Formal project standards? • Formal evaluation of resources… • How are these affected by the institutional context? • What aspects of that context drivee-Learning success and failure? NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  9. The Seven Principles • Good Practice: • Encourages student-faculty contact • Encourages cooperation among students • Encourages active learning • Gives prompt feedback • Emphasizes time on task • Communicates high expectations • Respects diverse talents and ways of learning Chickering and Ehrmann, 1996 NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  10. Quality on the Line • Institutional Support Benchmarks • Course Development Benchmarks • Course Structure Benchmarks • Student Support Benchmarks • Faculty Support Benchmarks • Evaluation and Assessment Benchmarks IHEP 2000 NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  11. Capability Maturity Models • CMM • SPICE • Capability refers to the ability of an institution to ensure that e-learning design, development and deployment is meeting the needs of the students, staff and institution. As well, capability includes the ability of an institution to sustain e-learning support of teaching as demand grows and staff change. NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  12. E-Learning Maturity Model • eMM NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  13. NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  14. E-Learning Maturity Model NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  15. Example NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  16. NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  17. Learning • Processes that directly impact on pedagogical aspects of e-learning NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  18. L1 and L7: Learning Objectives NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  19. L4: Implementation of Policy NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  20. L10: Accessibility NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  21. Development • Processes surrounding the creation and maintenance of e-learning resources NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  22. Coordination and Support • Processes around the day-to-day management and support of e-learning delivery NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  23. C2: Libraries NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  24. C5 and C9: Support for Students NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  25. C6 and C7: Familiarisation with Technology NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  26. Evaluation • Processes surrounding the evaluation and quality control of e-Learning through its entire lifecycle NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  27. E1,E2 and E4: Evaluating E-Learning NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  28. E7: Assessing Teaching Staff Skills NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  29. Organisation • Processes associated with institutional planning and management NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  30. O2 and O3: Technology Plans NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  31. O4 and O9: Information Provided to Students NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  32. Summary • More self awareness in sector • Intentionality • Communication of requirements on students • Technology • Learning Objectives NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  33. Future Directions • Evaluation of project outcomes • Development of the processes • Easier assessment of institutions • Expanded New Zealand coverage • International comparisons NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  34. Future Directions • Stage 2 TeLRF Project “New Zealand Tertiary Institution E-Learning Capability: Informing and Guiding E-Learning Architectural Change and Development” • Web access to assessments • Partial assessments • Ongoing evaluation of effectiveness of the eMM NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

  35. Questions? • http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/ • Acknowledgements • Dr Geoff Mitchell • Charlotte Clements • Darren Hoshek • Participating institution staff • New Zealand Ministry of Education NZ E-Learning Capability Determination

More Related