perdita
Uploaded by
8 SLIDES
248 VIEWS
80LIKES

Exploring the Beethamite Framework for NGO Legitimacy: Challenges and Insights

DESCRIPTION

This presentation by Erla Thrandardottir at the DSA Annual Conference discusses key issues surrounding NGO legitimacy through the lens of the Beethamite framework. It examines the literature dilemma, the national-international gap, and various approaches to understanding NGO accountability and effectiveness. The talk highlights the darker sides of NGOs, including their reliance on neoliberal agendas and the role they play in filling legitimacy gaps for intergovernmental organizations. Case studies of Amnesty International, Cafod, and Greenpeace illustrate these concepts in practice.

1 / 8

Download Presentation

Exploring the Beethamite Framework for NGO Legitimacy: Challenges and Insights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Beethamite framework for NGOs DSA Annual Conference 3 November 2012 Erla Thrandardottir

  2. The questions • Literature dilemma? • National-international gap? • Beethamite framework?

  3. Various approaches to NGO legitimacy • market model • services, performance, accountability, credibility • Problem: excl. advocacy and political side of NGOs • social change model • association, ‘bottom-up’, accountability, democracy • Problem: overlooks darker side of NGOs • new institutional model • norms, NGOs as legitimacy gap fillers for IGOs • Problem: NGOs often not unit of analysis • critical (development) model • empowerment, donor’s agendas, politics • Problem: over-reliant on neoliberal agenda for context?

  4. Beetham’s criteria operationalised for NGOs • Legitimacy as derived from rules • How do NGOs claim legal validity? (internal/external) • Legitimacy as justifiability of rules • What are the internal legitimation processes of NGOs? • Authoritative sources & Justifiable content • Legitimacy through expressed consent • In what capacity do NGOs present their legitimacy claims? • What is the (moral) authority of NGOs’ legitimacy claims?

  5. Applying Beetham's legitimacy criteria to NGOs • NGOs’ power to • Target audience: external (politicians, corporations, general public, global institutions, beneficiaries) • NGOs’ power over • Target audience: internal (members, staff, supporters, and to some extent beneficiaries)

  6. Case studies • Amnesty International: Membership NGO • Cafod: Faith-based NGO • Greenpeace: Environmental NGO

  7. Conclusion • Look at the normative structure of power and how it is socially constructed • Misleading to separate discussions on national and international units of NGOs • International legitimacy of NGOs rather than legitimacy of International NGOs

  8. Thank you for your kind attention

More Related