1 / 14

FM Diagnostics in Indian Local Governments Innovations & Challenges

FM Diagnostics in Indian Local Governments Innovations & Challenges. Decentralization - Background. Panchayats have been in existence in various forms for a long time even prior to independence 73rd and 74 th constitutional amendments (1992) provided legal mandate to states to:

nelly
Download Presentation

FM Diagnostics in Indian Local Governments Innovations & Challenges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FM Diagnostics inIndian Local GovernmentsInnovations & Challenges

  2. Decentralization - Background • Panchayats have been in existence in various forms for a long time even prior to independence • 73rd and 74th constitutional amendments (1992) provided legal mandate to states to: • Set up uniform three-tier structure with village, block and district levels (details left to states) • transfer functions (with powers) to local governments • Grant constitutional status to local governments • Empower disadvantaged groups (one-third reservation) • Hold free, fair and regular elections and keep terms fixed • Address the question of finances-formula for distribution by states (through State Finance Commissions)

  3. Government Structure 72 % of the population live in rural areas and 28 % in urban areas.

  4. Approach to Diagnostics • State Financial Accountability Assessments (why state?) - Chapters on PRIs and ULBs (why? The way GOI and Bank are set up) • Partnership with rural and urban sectors – Fiscal decentralization study, rural & urban projects, linkage to service delivery aspects • Networking with others – research institutes, central RD and UD ministries, state government departments, professional institute (ICAI) etc. • Assimilation/Synthesis study with highlighted good practices (in progress) • FM practices in local governments across selected countries (in pipeline)

  5. Size of Rural Local Bodies

  6. General Findings (1) • Concept of PRIs and ULBs as local governments is still evolving • Wide variation across states in the degree of decentralization and capacity (extremes) • Local Govts. are substantially under state control acting as extended implementing agencies with state funded staff • Almost exclusively dependent on the state & the center funds with minimal own revenues

  7. General Findings (2) • Within the constraints, a sound overall framework for PFMA is existent in PRIs and ULBs – capacity and compliance vary within a state and from state to state • Generally PRIs receive funds from 3 sources – State, Centre and grants as per CFC award • Most payments are routed through State Treasuries • Unpredictability of fund availability – allocation, availability, actual receipt, and timing of flow • Unreliable figures for analysis and expenditure tracking

  8. Findings (Accounts & Reporting) • Accounts • basic books reasonably maintained at district level (internal reporting vs. external reporting) • severe capacity constraints at village level • mostly delayed and a huge backlog (3-4 years in some cases) • not easily understandable – not a single consolidated statement but separate for each source of funding • not fully reliable due to non-adherence to standard practices & reconciliation – no National Standard setter for local govts. • inadequate information on deductions at source (electricity charges) • require simple formats, training and hand holding

  9. Findings (Audit) • Audits • varying practices – CAG audit in some states at some levels, mostly audit by Local Funds Auditor and some private auditors • multiplicity of audits depending upon the number of programs • issues relating to capacity, timeliness, coverage, quality, poor follow up • no consolidation at different tiers in most states and poor formal oversight arrangements • ULBs – Importance of reliable financial statements yet to take firm root as a way to approach financial markets

  10. Good Practices (1) • Oversight • social audit (Jamabandi in Karnataka & grama sabha in Kerala), participatory governance (Gram Sansad, Gram Unnayan Samiti, District Councils & Beneficiaries Committee in W. Bengal), and public hearing (Jan Sunwais in Rajasthan) • Right to Information Act (Rajasthan, Karnataka) • Ombudsman (Karnataka & Kerala) to review complaints against PRI functionaries • PROOF-Public Record of Operations & Finance in Karnataka • performance audit in Kerala

  11. Good Practices (2) • Funds flow – MORD’s routing of funds direct to districts instead of thru treasury (subject of debate) • Internal audit structure in all the three tiers in W. Bengal • CAG’s new accounting and reporting formats & ICAI Manual for ULBs • CAG’s publications on audit guidelines and training for PRIs • District Planning Committees (mandated) -view district as a whole and oversee budget preparation & execution (rural & urban) • Orissa-PRI Accounts Monitoring software (PRIASOFT) • Switch to accrual accounting and computerization in municipalities

  12. Challenges and the way forward • How to convince the importance of timely and reliable financial information? • Strong state leadership and monitoring • Human resource skills up gradation - cultural change • More participatory budgeting • Accounting-getting the basics right • each PRI to take responsibility for simple cash basis actg., timely & user friendly financial statements, routine reconciliation, gradual computerization • Parallel initiatives by various parties (state, CAG, ICAI, different ULBs)

  13. Challenges and the way forward (2) • Auditing • Need for systemic financial audits, timely response to audit queries and follow up, partnership with private auditors, strengthen internal audit • Improving local transparency • Publish information on budgets, fund releases, financial reports, development works, contracts awarded • Encouraging learning from each other on innovative reforms

  14. Follow up on Diagnostics Karnataka FM capacity building in PRIs FM capacity building in ULBs Andhra Pradesh – Urban FM component Tamilnad – improved financial reporting at ULBs following on prior computerization Possibility of a multi-donor regional Trust Fund to provide TA grants

More Related