1 / 27

Focus Group Workshop

Focus Group Workshop. Steven M. Culver, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of Academic Assessment Virginia Tech sculver@vt.edu Fall 2009. A focus group is . . . . Controlled, carefully planned discussion Gathers information about a particular topic

misha
Download Presentation

Focus Group Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Focus Group Workshop Steven M. Culver, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of Academic Assessment Virginia Tech sculver@vt.edu Fall 2009

  2. A focus group is . . . • Controlled, carefully planned discussion • Gathers information about a particular topic • Conducted in a non-threatening environment • Conducted by a moderator/facilitator • Group members influence each other by responding to ideas, comments of others • 7-10 participants

  3. Why a focus group • To collect qualitative data • To gather feelings and perceptions regarding services, programs, products • To promote self-disclosure among participants (note: familiarity inhibits disclosure), though not appropriate for emotionally charged environments • To stimulate interaction among participants to gather more information

  4. Uses of Focus Groups • Improve planning & design of new programs • Improve existing programs • Recruit new participants • Understand decision making processes • Generate information for larger studies

  5. Advantages of a focus group • Socially oriented research procedure – more interesting to participants than individual interviews • Format allows moderator to probe • High face validity – easily understood • More accurate than information from just one person • Low cost • Speedy results

  6. Disadvantages of a focus group • Researcher has less control • Data more difficult to analyze • Need carefully trained interviewer • Can introduce biases • May fail to follow up on crucial information • Groups can vary considerably • Groups may be difficult to assemble

  7. Produces qualitative information • Can precede quantitative approach • Can be used same time as quantitative approach • Can follow quantitative approach • Can be used alone

  8. Preparing for the session • Identify major objective(s) of the meeting • Develop 5 or 6 questions • Plan session – think of maximum time for session as 1 ½ to 2 hours • Invite participants • Be careful of mixing levels of education, authority, etc. • Incentives

  9. Moderator traits • Informed about the topic to be discussed • Able to encourage all members to participate • Exhibit empathy, but maintain control • Able to encourage group members to discuss in greater detail • Able to allow the session to flow smoothly – be adaptable.

  10. Beginning the Focus Group • Welcome • Overview and topic • Ground Rules • First question

  11. The Welcome • You are the host. Make participants feel welcome and comfortable. • Much of the success of the group interview is attributable to the development of an open environment. • First few moments of a focus group are critical.

  12. Overview and Topic • Provide your name and who you represent • Explain the purpose of the group and how the data will be collected and used • Note that there are no right/wrong answers, but rather differing opinions, so please share your point of view even if different from what others have said • Amount of time / breaks

  13. Ground Rules • Please speak up – one person at a time • We will be on a first-name basis for the discussion. • Talk about note-takers and tape recording if applicable. • Confidentiality – assured from your perspective and ask participants to respect confidentiality of others when outside the group

  14. The Questions • Get participants involved as soon as possible • Use open-ended questions: What did you think of the program? Be careful of phrases like “how satisfied” or “to what extent” • Avoid dichotomous, yes/no questions. • Avoid “why?” questions – implies cause/effect that might not exist • Use “think back” questions. Take people back to an experience, not forward to the future

  15. Identifying focus questions • Opening: get people talking and feeling comfortable • Introductory: Introduce topic, get people thinking and connecting with the topic • Transition: move conversation into key questions that guide the study • Key questions: those that drive the study • Ending: Bring to a close. Use “what is the most important thing we talked about,” “have we missed anything,” “summarize; is this an adequate summary?”

  16. Types of questions (Patton) • Behaviors – what person has done or is doing • Opinions/values • Feelings • Knowledge • Sensory – what people have seen, touched, heard • Background/demographics – age, gender, etc.

  17. Keeping it moving • May be helpful to think in terms of time blocks. • Introduction – 10 minutes • Purpose – 10 minutes • Topics & discussion – 50 minutes • Conclusion – 10 minutes

  18. Balancing • Use balancing to help the group round out its discussion rather than just follow the lead of a few • “are there other ways of looking at this?” • “what do others think?” • “So, we’ve heard x and y points of view, is there another?”

  19. Encouraging • Encouraging is about creating an opening for people to participate. • “Who else has an idea?” • “Is there a student’s perspective on this idea?” • “A lot of men have been talking; let’s hear from the women.” • “Let’s hear from someone who has spoken in a while.”

  20. Paraphrasing • Paraphrasing helps support people to think out loud, helps clarify, provides calming effect. • “It sounds like what you’re saying is . . .” • “Let me see if I’m understanding you . . .”

  21. Tracking/Reviewing • Tracking lets the group see that several elements are being discussed. • First, “I hear three conversations going on right now; I want to make sure I’m tracking them.” • Second, “It sounds like one conversation is about …” • Third, “Am I getting it right?”

  22. Considerations for Analysis • Be aware of the actual words used by the participants and the meaning of those words • Participant responses are triggered by a stimulus—examine the context of that response in that light • Look at frequency/extensiveness of comments – some topics may be more important than others • Consider intensity of the comments • Give more weight to specific comments based on experiences rather than vague, impersonal responses

  23. The Analysis Process • Begin while still in the group: listen for inconsistent or cryptic comments & probe further • Immediately after: diagram seating arrangement, debrief moderator, note takers, prepare report in question-by-question format • Later: compare/contrast results, look for emerging themes, construct typologies, use quotes to illustrate • Prepare report: narrative style, use quotes to illustrate, share report with the team for verification

  24. Analysis options • Transcript-based analysis • Tape-based analysis • Note-based analysis • Memory-based analysis

  25. Reporting • Purpose is to report views of the group, not to generalize to larger groups • Statement of problem, key questions used • Results/findings • Summary of themes • Limitations • Recommendations

  26. Helpful references • These slides based on the following sources: • Douglah, M. (2002, October 11). Focus group workshop. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison. • Bledsoe, M. Focus group manual. Daytona Beach, FL: One Voice for Volusia.

  27. Other references • Gibbs, A. (1997). Focus groups. Social research update. University of Surrey. http:/www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/ Krueger, R. A. (1997). Developing questions for focus groups. London: Sage. Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2004). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. 2nd ed. Sage.

More Related