1 / 29

Lag controller design

Lag controller design. It has “destabilizing” effect (lag) Not used for improving M P , t r , … Use it to improve e ss Use it when R.L. of G ( s ) go through the desired region but e ss is too large. Design steps. From specs, draw desired pole region

Download Presentation

Lag controller design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lag controller design • It has “destabilizing” effect (lag) • Not used for improving MP, tr, … • Use it to improve ess • Use it when R.L. of G(s) go through the desired region but ess is too large.

  2. Design steps • From specs, draw desired pole region • Draw R.L. for G(s). (it goes through ) • Select pd on R.L. & in region • Get • With that K, compute error constant(Kp, Kv, Ka) from KG(s) (call it Kva) • From specs, compute Kvd

  3. If Kva > Kvd , doneelse: pick • Re-compute • Closed-loop simulation & tuning as necessary

  4. Example: Want: Solution:

  5. Draw region

  6. Draw R.L. • Pick pd on R.L. & in Region pick pd = – 0.35 + j0.5 • Since there is one in G(s)

  7. A better tuning may be to go back and re-pick pd

  8. Lag control can improve ess, but cannot eliminate ess • Use PI control to eliminate ess • PI :

  9. Only advantage of PI: remove ess • It has destabilizing effect May ↑ MP , ↑ts , etc. • “Sluggish” settling, just like Lag • Needs trial and error tuning of Kp and KI

  10. This way, just use your PDdesign program.

  11. Second design: • Draw R.L. for G(s) • From specs, draw desired region • Pick pd on R.L. & in region • i. Chooseii. Choose • Simulate & tune

  12. Example: Want: Solution: Draw R.L.

  13. Clearly, R.L. pass through desired region. Pick (right on boundary) Choose

  14. Step response: ess = 0 No MP (no overshoot) fast rise to 0.85, then very sluggish to 1 Tune 1: KP↑ to 2.5 KP

  15. None unique solution • Design is a creative process based on science

  16. Example: Want:

  17. Sol: G(s) is type 1Since we want finite ess to unit acc, we need the compensated system to be type 2C(s) needs to have in it

  18. Draw R.L., it passes through the desired region. Pick pd on R.L. & in Region pick pd = – 180 + j160 Now choose z to meet Ka:

  19. Also:

  20. Pick z = 0.03 Do step resp. of closed-loop: Is it good enough?

  21. Design goal:

  22. If tr = 0.0105 not satisfactorywe need to reduce tr by ≈ 5%

More Related