1 / 35

Numerical ElectroMagnetics & Semiconductor Industrial Applications

National Central University Department of Mathematics. Numerical ElectroMagnetics & Semiconductor Industrial Applications. Ke-Ying Su Ph.D. 12 2D-NUFFT & Applications. Part II : 2D-NUFFT. Outline : 2D-NUFFT. Introduction 2D-NUFFT algorithm Approach Results and discussions Conclusion.

loe
Download Presentation

Numerical ElectroMagnetics & Semiconductor Industrial Applications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National Central University Department of Mathematics Numerical ElectroMagnetics& Semiconductor Industrial Applications Ke-Ying Su Ph.D. 12 2D-NUFFT & Applications

  2. Part II : 2D-NUFFT

  3. Outline : 2D-NUFFT Introduction 2D-NUFFT algorithm Approach Results and discussions Conclusion

  4. I. Introduction Numerical methods • Finite difference time domain approach (FDTD) • Spectral domain approach (SDA) • Finite element method (FEM) • Integral equation (IE) • Mode matching technique Widely used technique Method of Moment (MoM)

  5. Disadvantages 1) Slow convergence of Green’s functions 2) A large number of basis functions Used solutions Using the 2D discrete fast Fourier Transform (FFT) 1) 2D-FFT + Using the first few resonant modes’ current distributions 1,2) Nonuniform meshs for mixed potential integral equation (MPIE)

  6. New solution SDA + 2D-NUFFT + Nonuniform meshs NUFFT : 1D  2D The core idea of the 1D-NUFFT: The q+1 nonzero coefficients.

  7. accuracy The nonsquare 2D-NUFFT NUFFT : 1D  2D The square 2D-NUFFT Some of these 2D coefficients approach to zero rapidly. The (q+1)2 nonzero coefficients. remove directly coefficients accuracy least square error

  8. 2D-FFT II. 2D-NUFFT Algorithm Our aim (3.1) The key step (3.2) 2D-NUFFT (3.3)

  9. Fr & Pr : closed forms Regular Fourier Matrix For a given (xt,ys), for m = -M/2,…,M/2-1 and n = -N/2,…, N/2-1 A: (MN)(q2/2+3q+1) b : (MN)1 Ar(xt,ys) = b(xt,ys)   r(xt,ys) = [A*A]-1[A*b(xt,ys)] = Fr-1Pr (3.5) where Fr is the regular Fourier matrix with size (q2/2+3q+1)2

  10. The [g(q+1)+(p+1)]throw ofFfequalsVpVg. Solution Extract Fr and Pr from Ff and Pf where Ff is the regular Fourier matrix with size (q+1)2 1)Define a vector product  as [a1, a2, …, am]  [b1, b2, …, bn] = [a1b1, a2b1, …, amb1, …, a1bn, a2bn, …, ambn] (3.6) Let Vp and Vg be the (p+1)th and (g+1)th row of the regular Foruier matrix for 1D problem p and g = 0, 1, …,q.

  11. Let= ei2/cMand= ei2/cN, (3.7) (3.8)

  12. 2)Choosemn = cos(m/cM)cos(n/cN).  The [g(q+1) +(p+1)]thelement ofPf (3.9) where {x} = x- [x].

  13. Fr(i, j) = Ff((i), (j)) Pr(i) = Pf((i)) 3) FillFrand PrfromFfandPf For square grid points:  = [1, 2, …, (q+1)2] For octagonal grid points:  = [q/2, q/2+1, q/2+2, 3q/2, …, q2+3q/2, q2+3q/2+1, q2+3q/2+2]

  14. Index  = [4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, …, 76, 77, 78] The relation between Fr and Ff, and Pr and Pf Example: Let q = 8 Index  = [1, 2, 3, …, 79, 80, 81]

  15. 2D-NUFFT 1~3) Ff, PfFr, Pr  rr = Fr-1 Pr (3.5) 4) 2D-FFT: (3.4) If M = N = 210 and c = 2, then a 2D-FFT with size cMcN uses 3.02 seconds (CPU:1.6GHz). 5) (3.3)

  16. is the spectral domain Green’s function where III. Approach The Green’s functions substrate thicknesst box dimensionabc kxm = mp/a, kyn = np/b (3.10)

  17. Spectral domain Green’s functions

  18. Solution procedure Asymmetric rooftop functions and the nonuniform meshs J(x, y) = axJx(x, y) + byJy(x, y) (3.11) source load terminal load terminal

  19. Asymmetric rooftop function Jx = Jxx(x, x)Jxy(y, y) (3.12) (3.14a) (3.14b)

  20. Galerkin’s procedure Final MoM matrix (3.15) Trigonometric identities (3.16)

  21. Procedure for evaluating the MoM matrix

  22. III. Numerical Results Hairpin resonator er= 10.2, L1 = 0.7, L2 = 1.01, L3 = 2.74, L4 = 8, L5 = 6, w1 = 1, w2 = 1.19, g1 = 0.2 and g2 = 0.8. All dimensions are in mm.

  23. Table 3.1 Comparison of CPU Time and L2 error of One Call of the 2D-NUFFT in Analysis of a Hairpin Resonator Comparison of Analyses of The Hairpin Resonator with Uniform and Nonuniform Grids Table 3.2.1

  24. The measured and calculated S parameters of the hairpin resonator.

  25. Normalized magnitudes of the current distribution on the hairpin resonator at 2.473 GHz. (a) |Jx(x,y)| (b) |Jy(x,y)|

  26. Normalized magnitudes of the current distribution on the hairpin resonator at 2.397 GHz. (c) |Jx(x,y)| (d) |Jy(x,y)|

  27. Interdigital capacitor er= 10.2, L1 = 8, L2 = 1.6, L3 = 0.8, L4 = 1.2, L5 = 7.9, d = 0.4, e = 0.4, g = 0.2 and s = 0.2. The thickness of substrate is 1.27. All dimensions are in mm. Comparison of Analyses of The Ingerdigital capacitor with Uniform and Nonuniform Grids Table 3.2.2

  28. The measured and calculated S parameters of the interdigital capacitor.

  29. Normalized magnitudes of the current distribution on the interdigital capacitor at 5 GHz. (a) |Jx(x,y)| (b) |Jy(x,y)|

  30. Wideband filter L1 = 8, L2 = 0.56, L3 = 0.576, L4 = 0.69, L5 = 0.3605, L6 = 0.125, L7 = 0.125, L8 = 0.125, L9 = 5.19, L10 = 4.88, L11 = 0.38, L12 = 2.06, L13 = 1.9, L14 = 7.75, L15 = 11.3, t = 0.635, er = 10.8. All dimensions are in mm. Comparison of Analyses of The Wideband filter with Uniform and Nonuniform Grids Table 3.2.3

  31. The measured and calculated S parameters of the wideband filter.

  32. Normalized magnitudes of the current distribution at 6 GHz (a) |Jx(x,y)| (b) |Jy(x,y)|

  33. VI. Conclusion • A 2D-NUFFT algorithm with octagonalinterpolated • coefficients are used to enhance the Computation. • The octagonal2D-NUFFT uses less CPU time than • the square 2D-NUFFT. • The L2 error of the octagonal2D-NUFFT is the same • as that of square 2D-NUFFT. • The scattering parameters of the hairpin resonator, • an interdigital capacitor and a wideband filter are • calculated and validated by measurements.

  34. THE END Thank You for your Participation !

More Related