Multicultural Education: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives

1. Chapter Two Multicultural Education: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

2. Historical Perspectives on Pluralism • We have been different from the beginning • European immigrants met highly developed civilizations already here • English culture became dominant because of a slightly more tolerant attitude (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

3. Industrialization: Immigration and Religious Pluralism • The first type of difference to influence schooling was economic (social class) • The common school was largely a response to differences between rich and poor • As the industrial revolution grew and spread, new immigrants from Europe brought Catholicism—and thus, religious difference into a largely Protestant country (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

4. The Civil War: Freedmen’s Schools and the Issue of Race • Race became important to schooling after the Civil War • The Freedmen’s Bureau established schools for blacks in the South, a process that was characterized by the same kind of violence as had characterized the development of Catholic schools in the North (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

5. Segregation and the Law • Black children remained in segregated schools that were both underfunded and often open only part of the year • In 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in Plessy v. Ferguson, that “separate but equal” schools for blacks and whites was constitutional (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

6. The Civil Rights Movement and the Schools • Beginning with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, the Civil Rights Movement gained momentum during the 1960s and 1970s, resulting in antidiscrimination laws involving not only race, but also differences in language, gender, and disability. • In education, the chief concerns were access and equity to public education. (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

7. Historical Perspectives on Multicultural Education • In the history of public schooling, two approaches to difference, based on two different ideologies, have been utilized: • Anglo-conformity, or the assimilationist model • Multiculturalism, or the pluralist model (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

8. Anglo-Conformity, or the Assimilationist Model • From 1860–1920, 37 million immigrants became naturalized citizens • An important task of schooling was thought to be turning these new citizens into “Americans” as quickly as possible • Assimilationists believed that one’s identification with one’s ethnic group should be short-lived and temporary (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

9. The “Model” of American Culture • “Real” Americans are: • Mostly white, mostly middle class (or trying to be) • Protestant • Heterosexual • Work hard, eat well, stand on their own two feet, expect their children to behave themselves • Patriotic, charitable (as long as those receiving the charity try to “shape up”) • Believe in “good, old fashioned, common sense” (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

10. The Importance of Schooling in Producing “Real” Americans • Those who do not “fit” the dominant model of “American” must be encouraged, or forced, to reflect these characteristics, because such differences make them dangerous to the maintenance of America as it is “supposed” to be. • The schools are the chosen institution to take on this task. (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

11. Multiculturalism, or the Pluralist Ideology • In contrast to the assimilationist ideology, a small group of philosophers and writers came forward with the notions of cultural pluralism and cultural democracy. • Pluralists assert that immigrant groups (and, by extension, all identity groups) are entitled to maintain their distinctions within the larger American society. (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

12. Pluralist Assumptions • One’s social groups are essential to one’s sense of belonging and psychological support • It is through one’s primary groups that one learns language, as well as attitudes and values • These groups are so important that their interests should be promoted • The schools are the chosen institution to take on this task (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

13. Legislative and Judicial Landmarks • A number of legislative and judicial landmarks have addressed issues of access and equity in terms of: • Issues of race • Issues of religion • Issues of language • Issues of gender • Issues of disability • Issues of social class (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

14. Issues of Race • Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)–“separate but equal schooling” is constitutional • Brown v. Board of Education (1954)– “separate schooling is inherently unequal, and therefore, unconstitutional” • Brown v. Board of Education II (1955)– schools must desegregate with “all deliberate speed” (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

15. Implementing Brown v. Board • Green v. Country School Board of New Kent County (1968)—“freedom of choice” plans could not be used to avoid desegregation • Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971)—authorized mandatory bussing • Milliken v. Bradley I and II (1973, 1977)—Detroit schools not allowed to mandate cross-district bussing (usually thought to be the beginning of the end of bussing as a strategy for desegregation) (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

16. Issues of Religion • Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925)— legitimized parochial and other private schools • Engle v. Vitale (1962)—mandatory prayer violates separation of church and state • Abington School District v. Schempp (1963)—public schools cannot begin the day with required prayer or Bible reading con’t. (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

17. Epperson v. State of Arkansas (1968)—schools cannot ban the teaching of evolution • Edwards v. Aguillard (1987)—no state can require that the Biblical version of creation be taught • Board of Education of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens (1990)—students may organize and participate in Christian clubs that meet before or after school hours (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

18. Issues of Language • Bilingual Education Act (1968)—provided funding for bilingual education programs • Diana v. State Board of Education (1968)— tests for eligibility for special education services must be given in the dominant language of the student • Lau v. Nichols (1974)—affirmative steps must be taken by a school district to rectify language deficiencies con’t. (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

19. Keyes v. School District No. 1 (1977)—bilingual education is compatible with desegregation • Martin Luther King, Jr. Elementary School Children v. Ann Arbor School District Board of Education (1979)—legitimated Black English as a dialect • Proposition 227 (1998, California)—required schools to teach Limited English Proficient (LEP) students in special classes, mostly in English, for not more than one year (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

20. Issues of Gender • Title IX, Education Amendments (1972)—prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex in schools receiving federal aid • Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools (1992)— schools receiving federal funds can be sued for sex discrimination and harassment • Alida Star Gebser and Alida Jean Mccullough v. Lago Vista Independent School District (1998)— made it difficult to recover damages from a school district for sexual harassment (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

21. Issues of Disability • Education of All Handicapped Children Act (1976)— made schools responsible for education “in the least restrictive environment” • Honig v. Doe (1988)—special education students who are disruptive may not be suspended or expelled without due process • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA, 1990)—extended services to age 21 • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA, 1992)— extended rights of people with disabilities to the private sector (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

22. Issues of Social Class and School Funding • Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1965)— provides funding for Title I and for Head Start • Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1981)—Title I is renamed Chapter 1 • Rose v. Council for a Better Education (1989)—Kentucky Supreme Court declares property tax basis for school funding unconstitutional • Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1991)—Title I renamed Title 1 • Elementary and Secondary Education Act (2001)—No Child Left Behind Act vastly increases federal role in public education (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

23. Public Responses to Multicultural and Bilingual Education Reforms • One group consists of those who advocate programs such as multicultural and bilingual education • Another group consists of those who oppose any special programs, either because • They believe “traditional” schooling provides sufficient upward mobility, or • They believe pluralistic approaches will destroy the country con’t. (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

24. A third group asserts that pluralism in education should not be viewed as either a remedial form of education or an effort at reparation, but rather as the long-overdue affirmation of a social reality. (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

25. Theoretical Perspectives on Multicultural Education Sleeter and Grant propose five types of multicultural education: • Teaching the culturally different • Human relations approach • Single-group studies • Inclusive multicultural education • Education that is multicultural and social reconstructionist (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

26. Teaching the Culturally Different • These approaches attempt to counter a perceived cultural deficiency • Develop competence in the dominant culture • Maintain self-identity and retain own cultural identity • May mask an assimilationist ideology (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

27. Human Relations Approach • Assumes multicultural education is a means by which students of different backgrounds learn to communicate more effectively with one another • This is a fairly limited approach, and does not include attention to curriculum expansion and empowerment (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

28. Single-group Studies • Instruction that focuses on the experiences and cultures of one specific group • African-American History, Chicano Literature, and Native American Culture are some examples • While important, such efforts may tend to reinforce a single perspective, while paying less attention to multiple perspectives (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

29. Inclusive Multicultural Education • Places multicultural education in the larger context of overall curriculum and school reform • Focuses on the strength and value of diversity in a pluralistic nation • Expanded attention to the differences in gender, religion, geographical region, and disability (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

30. Education That Is Multicultural and Social Reconstructionist • This approach goes beyond multicultural education by helping students critically analyze the larger social forces involved in discrimination and oppression • Seeks to prepare students not only to think in multiple ways, but to be willing and able to help bring about social justice in the society (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e

31. Something to Think About The history of multicultural education has its roots in a debate between those who think that American schooling should provide a common education to all children based on the history and culture of European Americans and Western civilization, and those who think that American schooling must recognize and affirm the rich historical and cultural backgrounds and perspectives of a population that has always been diverse and is becoming ever more so. And the debate continues. (c) 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  All rights reserved. Cushner/McClelland/Safford, Human Diversity in Education, 5/e