1 / 18

Ch. 7: Dimensions of Culture

Ch. 7: Dimensions of Culture. How to compare cultures Case Study: Japanese Culture Sustainability values. Hofstede’s Value Dimensions. Dutch management researcher Geert Hofstede surveyed over 100,000 employees of IBM in 40 countries. The results of his survey are used to describe culture.

Download Presentation

Ch. 7: Dimensions of Culture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ch. 7: Dimensions of Culture How to compare cultures Case Study: Japanese Culture Sustainability values

  2. Hofstede’s Value Dimensions • Dutch management researcher Geert Hofstede surveyed over 100,000 employees of IBM in 40 countries. • The results of his survey are used to describe culture. • Hofstede identified four dimensions -individualism, masculinity, power distance, and uncertainty avoidance.

  3. Hofstede’s Value Dimensions-2 • A fifth dimension was found in 1984, a Confucian dynamism labeled long-term orientation versus short-term orientation to life. • This dimension describes cultures that range from short-term values respecting tradition & reciprocity in social relationships to valuing persistence and ordering relationships by status.

  4. Things to consider when exploring cultural dimensions • Statistics reveal an average of responses. NOT everyone in a culture will exhibit these traits. • Be wary of using the dimensions to stereotype. • The goal of the dimensions is to point out how culture shapes communication and vice versa.

  5. Focus on Theory • Knowledge about what makes a culture individual or collective helps inform our understanding in the study of numerous fields. • Individualism/collectivism(Kim, 2005) and high/low context (Hall, 1976) are complementary theories. • Refers to how people define themselves in relationship to others.

  6. Individualism • The interests of the individual takes priority over those of others. • Ties between individuals are loose. • People look after themselves and their immediate families. • Goals take self & possibly immediate family into consideration. • The United States ranks highest in individualism (pg. 171).

  7. Individualism • Cultures high in individuality have wealthier citizens. • Countries with moderate and colder climates. • Self-sufficient. • Birth rates are lower.

  8. Collectivism • The interests of the group are given priority. • People belong to strong, cohesive, in-groups that protects and support in exchange to group loyalty. • Goals are set taking the group into account. • Highly integrated.

  9. Collectivism • Countries with higher birth rates tend towards collectivism • Confucian cultures are highly collective. • Associated with indirect forms of communication.

  10. Case Study:Japan as a homogeneous culture • History • Religion • Cultural Patterns • Sports (see insert)

  11. Masculinity and Femininity • Hofstede found women’s social roles vary less from culture to culture than men’s. • Cultures that highly value assertiveness, competition, and material wealth are masculine and emphasize the differences. • Feminine cultures are those that allow for more overlap between gender roles. • These cultures also emphasis quality of life, relationships, and care.

  12. Masculinity and Femininity • Remember that both men and women express the value characteristics of their culture. • Both men and women in masculine cultures exhibit ambition. • Both men women in feminine cultures learn to be modest and seek cohesion. • Feminine cultures allow more cross-over between roles.

  13. High and Low Power Distance • The way cultures deal with inequalities, i.e. money, power, status, birth. • Power distance is learned in families. • Cultures with high power distance have power concentrated in the hands of the few rather than distributed throughout the population. • What about the U.S. • http://www.aflcio.org/Corporate-Watch/CEO-Pay-and-the-99

  14. Uncertainty Avoidance • This identifies the extent that people feel threatened by uncertainty or the unknown in the culture. • Hallmarks of cultures high in uncertainty avoidance include: strict codes of behavior and beliefs in absolute truths. • People with high needs for certainty are often characterized as active, aggressive, emotional, compulsive, and intolerant.

  15. Uncertainty Avoidance-2 • Those with low needs for certainty are characterized as contemplative, unemotional, relaxed, accepting of personal risk, and relatively tolerant. • Hofstede looked at the relationship between religion and power distance and history. • Greece is ranked highest in this dimension (see table. 7.6).

  16. Long-Term vs. Short-Term Orientation • Called “Confucian work dynamism” at first, now we refer to it as long and short term orientation to LIFE. • This dimension includes such values as thrift, persistence, having a sense of shame, and ordering relationships. • This value is present in cultures that show high degrees of responsibility, motivation, dedication and belief in education (see table 7.7).

  17. Environmental Sustainability • Sustainability is “development which meets the needs of the present w/o compromising the ability of the future generations to meet their own needs” p. 190. • Husted (2005) & Hofstede conclude: Low power distance, high individualism, low masculinity support “sustainable” values. • See table 7.8. Env. Perf. Index

  18. Focus on Theory: Criticism of Hofstede’s Value Dimensions • Nations are not the best units to study. • Survey sample data is small. • Survey data is old and outdated. • Data drawn from only one company that cannot provide information about entire national cultures. • Four or five dimensions limits insight into cultures.

More Related