1 / 20

Aristotle: Justice, Purpose and the Good

Aristotle: Justice, Purpose and the Good. Aristotle Dr. Schmid, Ph.D. Philosophy and Religion, UNCW. Three Ethical Theories. Aristotelian Ethics and Politics. Virtue concept: best life for individual and state is virtuous citizenship Key not = equality but virtue and common good

Download Presentation

Aristotle: Justice, Purpose and the Good

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Aristotle: Justice, Purpose and the Good Aristotle Dr. Schmid, Ph.D. Philosophy and Religion, UNCW

  2. Three Ethical Theories

  3. Aristotelian Ethics and Politics • Virtue concept: best life for individual and state is virtuous citizenship • Key not = equality but virtue and common good • Just society = institutions  right purposes /common good • Military  security, order • All male army • Family  raising children • Support for traditional family • Education  better citizens • Free education • Politics  common good • Liberal challenge: • Modern society is morally plural: different concepts of “the good life,” virtue e.g. • Catholic housewife in Philly vs. gay hairdresser in Frisco • Aristotelian ideas may violate liberty, fairness, e.g. • Liberty: • surrogate mother case • military service = duty? • Fairness: disability cases • cheerleader, Casey Martin

  4. Some related issues • Equality, prejudice, affirmative action • Institutional purpose and diversity • Citizenship and cultural differences • Morality issues, e.g. the family • Reparations for past injustice

  5. 1. Discrimination and U.S. Law • “All men are created equal…and endowed with inalienable rights” • Plessy (1896) established “separate but equal” with full rights of businesses to refuse service based on race, religion. • Brown (1954) overturned this; 1965 law on “public accommodations” forbade discrimination in service, then hiring Persisting issues: • ‘institutional racism’ = no overt racism/sexism, but • Persisting prejudice • Lingering effects • Disproportionately small minority representation •  “affirmative action” programs to increase minority representation: schools, loans, etc. • New: women, GLBTs, Muslims (?)

  6. Justifications for Affirmative Action 3 Traditional arguments for Affirmative Action programs: • Counter-act ongoing discrimination (AlabamaState Troopers, Santa Clara; “institutional racism”) • Backward-looking: massive past discrimination meant unfair disadvantages ( scholarships, outreach programs, loans) • Forward-looking: continuation of present policies continued disproportionate representation and theme of “institutional purpose,” social good

  7. 2. Institutional purpose and ‘merit’ • Liberal argument: equal rights means equal competition: anything else = discrimination and wrong! • Aristotelian argument: self-actualization for all, social purpose may mean require regard for race, gender, religion

  8. Little Leaguers All Equal? • Jackie Wilson had been a star player for the Bulldogs Little League team in Marieta, GA • At the start of the new season, the new coach declared all players would have “equal time” (except perhaps in big games) • Jack’s parents sued the league, on grounds that playing time should depend on merit, and this policy “did not allow fair competition”

  9. Is Affirmative Action unjust? • Cheryl Hopwood sued for admission vs. U. of Texas Law School, arguing she was denied based on “reverse racism” • UTLS claimed a valid goal of > minority representation in Texas bar, where 40% of clients were minority (25% Latino), 4% of attorneys (1% Latino) • If this  less or worse representation, is the UTLS goal valid? • Similar questions for other professions, e.g. medical

  10. Cheerleader in a wheel chair? • Callie Smart was a popular cheerleader for the Andrews HS Mustangs in West Texas • At the end of the season, the coach instituted new tests she could not pass, to make the team more competitive in state cheerleading comps • Her parents sued to have her re-instated, on grounds of unfairness since she “served the purpose of the squad and the school”

  11. Pro golfer in a cart? • Casey Martin was an excellent golfer with a serious leg disability which prevented him from walking the course • He sued the PGA to be able to use a cart, on the grounds that walking was not essential to golf • In a 7-2 decision the US Supreme Court agreed

  12. Two Big Issues Gender and sports • Should we have non-gendered sports teams? • What is the purpose of collegiate sports? Is it different from h.s. sports? Gender and academics • Gendered college admissions? • What is the purpose of college? Would a balance of m/f students serve a valid social purpose? [another issue: women in military?]

  13. What is the telos of the institution?

  14. What is the justification?

  15. 3. Citizenship and cultural differences: liberty and the veil • In France, there are concerns about Islam and women’s liberty • Should French law defend the rights of Muslim women, often suppressed in the home, by forbidding the veil in schools? • Or the veil an expression of religious liberty, that should be protected? • Can a society be “neutral” about this type of cultural custom, if the majority view it as oppressive?

  16. Discrimination and Economic Freedom • Arizona Senate Bill 1062 would allow business owners to refuse service to gays on religious grounds. • Those on other side say it's a potentially broad libertarian law which could open the door to widespread ‘free’ discrimination. • Gay rights in NC: should renters be allowed to discriminate vs. GLBTs?

  17. 4. Morals legislation • Abortion and personal liberty • Sexual orientation, children and the family * Related: Should the state provide economic support for spousal care? = support for working families • Legislation e.g. vs. hard core porn, self-mutilation art, prostitution, gambling, drug use, surrogacy, etc. as “de-humanizing”? • Should the state

  18. Same sex marriage • Is gay sexuality ‘unnatural’? • Should the state be neutralabout same sex marriage? • If intervene, on what basis? • Prohibit same sex marriage (on grounds that a majority think it is immoral) • Promote same sex marriage (on grounds that it creates lasting bonds, vs. casual sex)

  19. Liberal vs. Communitarian • Concept of the Self • Autonomous individual • Self-respect • Concept of the State • Priority of the right • Protects formal justice • Protects material justice (EO) • Neutrality re: the good • State neutrality” toward morals, religion, etc. • Wants “public discourse” to presuppose moral pluralism • Concept of the Self • Situated/encumbered self • Rational fulfillment w/virtue • Concept of the State • Priority of the good (virtue) • Protects rule by the best • Values virtue over consent • Examples: • Minority cultures & liberal values (e.g. the veil) • Rejects moral pluralism on e.g. abortion, euthanasia, gay marriage & adoption

  20. Equality, Purpose and Justice

More Related