1 / 21

The DØ Silicon Microstrip Tracker (SMT)

The DØ Silicon Microstrip Tracker (SMT). Design Production & Assembly Readout Installation & Commissioning First Results. Breese Quinn, FNAL Vertex2001 September 24, 2001 (presented by Frank Lehner, Universitaet Zuerich). SMT Design. 12 F Disks. 4-layer barrel cross-section.

kail
Download Presentation

The DØ Silicon Microstrip Tracker (SMT)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The DØ Silicon Microstrip Tracker (SMT) • Design • Production & Assembly • Readout • Installation & Commissioning • First Results Breese Quinn, FNAL Vertex2001 September 24, 2001 (presented by Frank Lehner, Universitaet Zuerich)

  2. SMT Design 12 F Disks 4-layer barrel cross-section 4 H Disks 6 Barrels SMT Statistics B. Quinn

  3. SMT Design B. Quinn

  4. SMT Design • Require good 3D track reconstruction performance for high-pT (top, Higgs, EW, NP) and low-pT (B) tracks out to || < 3 • Momentum resolution less than 10% at pT = 1 GeV/c • Impact parameter resolution within 30 m • Forward H disks are employed to achieve these resolutions at high || B. Quinn

  5. Production & Assembly: Devices • Ladders • 3-chip: 72 single-sided, axial ladders in the two outer barrels • 6-chip: 144 double-sided, axial/90° ladders in the four inner barrels • 9-chip: 216 double-sided, axial/2° ladders in all barrels • Ladders have a mechanical accuracy of 2-5 m • Wedges • F Disks: 144 double-sided, ±15°, 6+8 chip wedges • H Disks: 96×2 back-to-back single-sided, ±7.5°, 6 chip wedges • Wedges have a mechanical accuracy of 5-10 m • SVX IIe chip • 128 channel 8-bit digital chip, with 32 cell pipeline depth • 1.2 m rad-hard technology • 106 MHz digitization, 53 MHz readout • Rise time set to integrate 99% of charge in 100 ns • Over 2.3 million wirebonds were made to chips 9-chip ladder H wedge SVX IIe chip B. Quinn

  6. Production & Assembly: Testing • Probe Test • Debug bad strips (broken capacitors), bonds, chips, etc. • Determine the V-I characteristics of the sensors • Measure V-max p-side breakdown voltage (micro-discharge effect) • Burn-in • Bias the ladder or wedge and test the readout for 72 hours • Measure pedestals, noise, gain and check sparse readout • Laser • Expose biased detectors to a narrow laser scan • Measure the depletion voltage and leakage currents and identify dead channels • Readout tested again after the detector is mounted on a barrel or disk V-max Fail B. Quinn

  7. Production & Assembly: Failure Modes • Sensor lithography defects • A silicon manufacturing problem produced p-stop isolation defects in the 90° stereo ladders. This resulted in a 30% yield from the manufacturer. • Microdischarge effect • With negative p-side bias on double-sided detectors, we observed microdischarges producing large leakage currents and noise at a breakdown voltage. • The effect occurs along the edges of the p implants, where large field distortions and charge accumulations result from misalignment of electrodes with implants. • Effect moves to n-side after type inversion. B. Quinn

  8. Production & Assembly: Detector Quality • Detector classification: • Dead channel: < 40 ADC count response to laser • Noisy channel: > 6 ADC count pedestal width • Grade A: less than 2.6% dead/noisy channels • Grade B: less than 5.2% dead/noisy channels • Only used mechanically OK Grade A and B detectors 6-Chip Ladders Channel Fractions (%) B. Quinn

  9. Production & Assembly: Alignment Barrel 1 Rotations Internal alignment was accomplished using a CMM machine that aligns ladders and wedges to < 20 m. e.g. Rotation  along long axis of ladder ( = 10 m  3 m error on impact parameter)  (mm) B. Quinn

  10. SMT Readout: Data Flow HV / LV I,V,T Monitoring 8’ Low Mass Cable ~19’-30’ High Mass Cable (3M/80 conductor) 25’ High Mass Cable (3M/50 conductor) 3/6/8/9 Chip HDI KSU Interface Board CLKs CLKs Adapter Card SEQ SEQ SEQ Sensor SEQ Controller Optical Link 1Gb/s Detector volume Platform Serial Command Link VRB VRB VRB VBD 68k/PwrPC 1 5 5 3 VRB Controller Bit3 VME PC MPM L3 Counting House SDAQ B. Quinn

  11. SMT Readout: Electronics • SEQuencers • 6 crates (120 boards) located on the detector hall platform • Use SVX control lines to effect data acquisition, digitization and readout • Convert SVX data to optical signals • VRBs (VME Readout Buffers) • 12 crates (120 boards) located in the counting house • Data buffer pending L2 trigger decision • Input @ 5-10 kHz L1 accept rate ~ 50 Mb/s/channel • Output @ 1 kHz L2 accept rate ~ 50 Mb/s • Interface Boards • 8 crates (144 boards) located inside the detector volume • Refresh signals and adjust timing • SVX monitoring and power management • Bias voltage distribution B. Quinn

  12. Installation Fiber Tracker • Cylinder installation was completed on 12/20/00 • A ½ cylinder of 3 barrels and 6 F disks was inserted into each end of the CFT bore • H Disk installation was completed on 2/6/01 • The cabling (~15,000 connections) and electronics installation was completed in May 2001 Calorimeter Low Mass Cables SMT High Mass Cables Interface Boards B. Quinn

  13. Commissioning • The entire detector has been connected and powered • ~15% of the devices are not in the readout because the SVX chips cannot be downloaded. • 10% ladders, 18% F wedges, 20% H wedges • Problems could be with cables, connectors, chips, etc. We will debug each of them during the October/November shutdown, and expect to recover more than half. • Currently collecting calibration and alignment data B. Quinn

  14. Comissioning • Online event display for SMT commissioning B. Quinn

  15. Charge Collection • A cluster is defined as a contiguous sequence of strips with • Each strip  6 ADC counts • Cluster  12 ADC counts • Timing setting a-b-c represents a signal delay of (a-1)132 ns + (b-1)18 ns + (c-1)2 ns • Preamp bandwith (pabw) sets the integration time • With 396 ns bunch spacing, all charge should be collected with any of the pabw settings • Higher pabw results in lower noise level B. Quinn

  16. Timing and S/N • Higher preamp bandwith does not significantly reduce noise on n-side B. Quinn

  17. Alignment: Residuals • SMT-only tracking with at least 4 hits • Magnet off data • Similarity of residuals from reconstruction with ideal and survey geometries indicates excellent internal alignment of the SMT Ideal Geometry Survey Geometry B. Quinn

  18. Alignment: SMT & CFT Track Matching • Tracks were found separately in the SMT and the Central Fiber Tracker (CFT) • SMT tracks were extrapolated to the CFT at which point the track offsets were measured • Magnet off data r = -3  36 m B. Quinn

  19. J/ Candidate Sample PRELIMINARY Sherry Towers B. Quinn

  20. Conclusions • Design/Production • Experience with double-sided detectors has led to the decision to use single-sided silicon for the upgrade. • Should work toward simpler designs in the future. For example, using 6 different sensor types resulted in extensive logistical complications. • Assembly/Installation • Alignment results show that the DØ SMT was assembled and installed extremely well. Congratulations to the SiDet and DAB staff! • Commissioning • The SMT was the first major DØ Upgrade detector system fully operational for Run 2A. More than 85% of the channels were available for readout on startup, and most of the remaining channels will be debugged and recovered by November. • Results • Very nice calibration (and first look at physics!) results have been produced from the early data, as we continue to better understand our detector. B. Quinn

  21. Alignment: Beam Distance of Closest Approach vs.  Vertex Position B. Quinn

More Related