1 / 16

Chapter 3

Chapter 3. The Decision Usefulness Approach to Financial Reporting. Chapter 3 The Decision Usefulness Approach to Financial Reporting. 3.2 The Decision Usefulness Approach. It is the investor’s responsibility to make investment decisions

jjuarez
Download Presentation

Chapter 3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 3 The Decision Usefulness Approach to Financial Reporting

  2. Chapter 3The Decision Usefulness Approach to Financial Reporting

  3. 3.2 The Decision Usefulness Approach • It is the investor’s responsibility to make investment decisions • Role of financial reporting is to supply information that is useful for this purpose • To prepare useful information, the accountant must know how investors make decisions

  4. 3.3 The Rational Decision Theory Model • A model of rational decision making in the face of uncertainty • Definition of rationality? • A game against nature: “nature does not think” • Other ways to make decisions? • Continued

  5. 3.3 The Rational Decision Theory Model (continued) • Role of the rational decision theory model in financial reporting • Helps us understand how financial statement information helps investors to make investment decisions • Captures average investor behaviour?

  6. Bayes’ Theorem • A device to revise state probabilities upon receipt of new evidence • Θ is state of nature • m is message received • P(θ) is prior probability of θ (subjective) • Formula

  7. Bayes’ Theorem Applied to Accounting Information • θ is state of firm θ1 = H = high future firm performance θ2 = L = low future firm performance • m is evidence received from the financial statements m1 = GN = net income shows good news m2 = BN = net income shows bad news • Suppose GN is received:

  8. 3.3.2 The Information System IShows Evidence Probabilities, Conditional on Each State, for Input into Bayes’ Theorem

  9. The Information System II • The higher the main diagonal probabilities, the better the investor can predict the state of nature (i.e., future firm performance) • The main diagonal probabilities capture financial statement informativeness • Highly informative financial statements also called: • Transparent • Precise • High quality

  10. The Information System III • Information system probabilities are objective • Reflect quality of GAAP • How known by investor? • Prior probabilities are subjective • Investor assesses them based on all information available prior to the investment decision

  11. The Information System IV • If prior probabilities are subjective, so are posterior probabilities • However, if financial statement information is informative, posterior probabilities are better predictors of future firm performance than prior probabilities

  12. 3.3.3 Definition of Information • Information is evidence that has the potential to affect an individual’s decision

  13. Theory of Investment • Points to note: • The rational investor • Risk aversion • Portfolio diversification • beta

  14. 3.8 Do Professional Accounting Bodies Accept the Rational Decision Theory? • SFAC 1 • Oriented to investors • Oriented to rational investment decisions • Accepts that investors are risk averse • Financial statements provide information to help investors assess (posterior probabilities of) the amounts, timing, and uncertaintyof investment proceeds (i.e., of future firm performance) • Note that Bayes’ theorem is implied • Continued

  15. 3.8 Do Professional Accounting Bodies Accept the Rational Decision Theory? (continued) • SFAC 2 • To help investors, financial statement information should be: • Relevant • Can “make a difference” • Reliable • Faithful representation • Verifiable • Neutral

  16. Conclusions • Rational decision theory provides a theoretical underpinning for study of information needs of investors • Conceptual framework SFAC 1 and SFAC 2 accept the rational decision theory model

More Related