Circulation Data: Social Work Library - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

jermaine-aguilar
circulation data social work library n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Circulation Data: Social Work Library PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Circulation Data: Social Work Library

play fullscreen
1 / 32
Download Presentation
Circulation Data: Social Work Library
81 Views
Download Presentation

Circulation Data: Social Work Library

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Circulation Data: Social Work Library Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University

  2. Social Work Circulation Data • Looks at Social Work Library circulation activity • Is only one measure of collection usage • Presents data both SW specific and system-wide • ?CircDesk uses several happening locations: Social Work, Butler, BorrowDirect, HSL • No circulation data for non-circulating collections ReCAP Columbia University

  3. ?SW Library Background • ?Social Work Library became independent entity in August 2004 • ?Opening of new Social Work building • ?Print collection was previously part of Lehman Library in SIPA • ?Transition period between August 2004 and May 2005 • ?Two happening locations: • Social Work Circ. Deck • SW Circulation Desk ReCAP Columbia University

  4. SW Library Happening Location • Data collated by happening location • Social Work Library became independent entity in August 2004 • Five primary types of circulation activity: charge, discharge, renewal, recall and hold • Most renewals and recalls are done in the OPAC happening location, dynamically by patrons themselves • Note: circulation data includes primarily “on campus” collections ReCAP Columbia University

  5. ReCAP Columbia University

  6. ReCAP Columbia University

  7. Observations • Total volume of charges has fluctuated • System-wide there has been a 27.4% decline • Volume of discharge predictably mirrors charges • Other types of circulation activity happen in much lower volume • Majority of renewals occur in the OPAC happening location ReCAP Columbia University

  8. SW Circulation by Patron Group • Almost 3/4 of all charges are to graduate students • Patron Group definitions have changed: • Adjunct faculty, in 2008 grad students were given primary group OFF instead of GRD • Pie charts break down data for FY12 only • Bar chart compares patron group charges for each fiscal year ReCAP Columbia University

  9. ReCAP Columbia University

  10. ReCAP Columbia University

  11. ReCAP Columbia University

  12. ReCAP Columbia University

  13. Circ Activity by Collection • Over the life of SW, charge activity is split evenly between stacks and reserves collections • In FY12, activity was heavier with Reserves • Charges to SW Stacks has declined steadily each fiscal year • Offsite charges should be placed in the Butler Happening Location • Data unavailable for non-circulating collections ReCAP Columbia University

  14. ReCAP Columbia University

  15. ReCAP Columbia University

  16. ReCAP Columbia University

  17. Collection Use by Patron Group • Data for all transactions in the SW Happening Location • Nearly 80% is for the LC Stacks collection alone • Offsite charges are placed in the Butler Happening Location • Data unavailable for non-circulating collections ReCAP Columbia University

  18. ReCAP Columbia University

  19. ReCAP Columbia University

  20. ReCAP Columbia University

  21. System-wide Circulation Data • System-wide circulation statistics are available for both on campus and offsite collections • Circulation data are accessible to all staff • Offsite collections can be identified by CLIO location format off,xxx. • System-wide data is available from July 2003, the date of Ex Libris Voyager implementation ReCAP Columbia University

  22. On Campus vs. Offsite Charges • Comparison of on campus and offsite collection charges by volume • On campus charge volume declined by 27.4%between FY04 and FY12 • On campus charges have declined every year since FY04 • Offsite charge volume increased 121.3% between FY04 and FY12 • N.B. On campus collection size declines each year; offsite collections grow each year ReCAP Columbia University

  23. ReCAP Columbia University

  24. Monthly Onsite vs. Offsite Charges • Monthly charges of both onsite and off-site collections are in phase with the academic calendar • Peaks in the middle of Fall and Spring terms • The pattern of offsite charges is more apparent when viewed alone ReCAP Columbia University

  25. ReCAP Columbia University

  26. ReCAP Columbia University

  27. On Campus vs. Offsite Charges • On campu and offsite charges can be compared using a ratio • The ratio of offsite to on campus increased from FY04 to FY012 • Offsite collections are accounting for proportionally more activity ReCAP Columbia University

  28. ReCAP Columbia University

  29. Charges vs. Renewals • Chart compares total volume of charges to renewals for Offsite collections • Graduate students and Faculty request more Offsite collections than Undergraduates • Graduate students and especially Faculty have higher renewal/charge ratios • Over time, these two patron groups tend to renew more than charge • CUL may expect to see steady or decreasing request volume as a result ReCAP Columbia University

  30. ReCAP Columbia University

  31. ReCAP Columbia University

  32. More Data Available • More information about data sets can be found on the ReCAP Data Center website • Primary data categories include: accession, retrieval, delivery and circulation • Tailored data sets and analysis will be provided to staff via the ReCAP Coordinator • Please see the main ReCAP website for general information about CUL procedures and systems ReCAP Columbia University