1 / 12

Value Aging

Value Aging. WP6: Best Practices Identification, Analysis and Collection . Best Practices Identification, Analysis and Collection. Start date : m12 (September 2011) Leading Beneficiary: OeAW/ITA Resources: OeAW/ITA VUB FATRONIK VEGAN FRONTIDA. NEWLY RECRUITED

hawa
Download Presentation

Value Aging

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Value Aging WP6: Best Practices Identification, Analysis and Collection

  2. Best Practices Identification, Analysis and Collection • Start date : m12 (September 2011) • Leading Beneficiary: OeAW/ITA • Resources: • OeAW/ITA • VUB • FATRONIK • VEGAN • FRONTIDA • NEWLY RECRUITED • 1ER (12m for FATRONIK) • IN SECONDMENT • 1ESR (12m) from INNOVA  OeAW • 1ESR (6m) from INNOVA  VUB • 1ESR (6m) from FRONTIDA FATRONIK • 1ER (3m) from OeAW  FATRONIK • 1ESR (6m) from VUB  VEGAN • 1ESR (6m) from NETWELL  FRONTIDA

  3. Objectives • Developing specific metrics, • compare and contrast different forms of incorporation practices, • identifying best practices, and • creating and maintaining a database of best practices.

  4. A 6.1: Overall problem definition and WP implementation plans • Responsible Beneficiary: OeAW/ITA • Timeframe: m12 – m18 (September 2011 – February 2012) • Resources: Internal resources + 1 seconded ESR from INNOVA • OeAW will provide a WP implementation plan. This includes: • WP Overview and problem definition • Goals and Objectives • Deliverables • Human resource allocation • Dissemination Plans • Transfer of Knowledge • Stakeholders • Dissemination Plan • Risk Plan

  5. A 6.2: Legal and regulatory aspects of best practices identification • Responsible Beneficiary: VUB • Timeframe: m21 – m24 (June 2012 – September 2012) • Resources: Internal resources + 1 seconded ESR from INNOVA • Legal and regulatory aspects related to identification of best practices in the field of ICT for ageing will be discussed, and • a set of specific guidelines will be issued.

  6. A 6.3: Ethical and social best practices on eAccessibility • Responsible Beneficiary: FATRONIK • Timeframe:m25 – m36 (October 2012 – September 2013) • Resources: Internal resources + 1 newly recruited ER + 1 seconded ESR from FRONTIDA + 1 ER from OeAW/ITA • Best practices in the field of eAccessibility will be identified, collected and discussed. • Organisations will be surveyed for measures and practices, trying to respect a balanced geographic and public-private sector distribution. • Methodology will extensively use Internet search, email contacts, phone calls, face‐to‐face interviews, in situ visits.

  7. A 6.4: Ethical and social best practices on ICT training and social web for older population • Responsible Beneficiary: VEGAN • Timeframe: m25 – m36 (October 2012 – September 2013) • Resources: Internal resources + 1 seconded ESR from VUB • Best practices about on ICT training and social web for older population will be identified, collected and discussed. • Organisations will be surveyed for measures and practices, trying to respect a balanced geographic and public‐private sector distribution. • Methodology will extensively use Internet search, email contacts, phone calls, face‐to‐face interviews, in situ visits.

  8. A 6.5: Ethical and Social Best Practices in Home Care • Responsible Beneficiary: FRONTIDA • Timeframe: m25 – m36 (October 2012 – September 2013) • Resources: Internal resources + 1 seconded ESR from NETWELL • Best practices in home care for older people will be identified, collected and discussed. • Organisations will be surveyed for measures and practices, trying to respect a balanced geographic and public-private sector distribution. • Methodology will extensively use Internet search, email contacts, phone calls, face‐to‐face interviews, in situ visits.

  9. A 6.6: Reporting • Responsible Beneficiary: OeAW/ITA • Timeframe: m37 – m46 (October 2013 – July 2014) • Resources: Internal resources + 1 seconded ESR from INNOVA • Draft final benchmarking report. Validated through the following procedures: • Elite Interviews • Stakeholder review • Public consultation • Final benchmarking report will be disseminated after the project completion.

  10. Deliverables • D6.1: WP problem definition and implementation plans (OeAW/ITA, m18 – March 2012) • D6.2: Report on legal aspects of best practices (VUB, m24 – September 2012) • D6.3: Report on ethical and social best practices on eAccessibility (FATRONIK, m36 – September 2013) • D6.4: Report on ethical and social best practices on ICT training of older population (VEGAN, m36 – September 2013) • D6.5: Report on Ethical and Social Best Practices in Home Care (FRONTIDA, m36 – September 2013) • D6.6: Final Report on ELSHI Best Practices (OeAW/ITA, m46 – July 2014)

  11. Researchers • OeAW/ITA: • 1 ESR Seconded from Innova – 12 months • VUB: • 1 ESR Seconded from Innova – 6 months • FATRONIK: • 1 Newly Recruited ER – 12 months • 1 ESR Seconded from FRONTIDA – 6 months • 1 ER Seconded from OeAW – 3 months • VEGAN: • 1 ESR Seconded from VUB – 6 months • FRONTIDA: • 1 ESR Seconded from Netwell – 6 months

  12. WP6 Overview

More Related