590 likes | 866 Views
2. Introduction. How are we to understand the ?effects' (dodgy term) of cinema?Do we need to look beyond the films (texts) themselves?. 3. Audiences. Branston?Textiness'Pleasures in SpectatorshipThe lookIdentificationPleasures in Cinemagoing. 4. Audiences. 4Hanson: Multiplexes5Exhibition,
                
                E N D
1. 1 Audiences ‘Movies move audiences’
Gill Branston  2000
‘Spoilt for choice?  Multiplexes in the 90s’ 
Stuart Hanson  2000  
2. 2 Introduction How are we to understand the ‘effects’ (dodgy term) of cinema?
Do we need to look beyond the films (texts) themselves?
 
3. 3 Audiences Branston
‘Textiness’
Pleasures in Spectatorship
The look
Identification
Pleasures in Cinemagoing 
4. 4 Audiences 
4	Hanson: Multiplexes
5	Exhibition, Edinburgh & Film Culture
 
5. 5 1   Textiness Paradox of textual study:
Need authoritative interpretation of the text (eg film)
But
It’s impossible. 
6. 6 1   Textiness Textual study was often centred on questions of meaning:
How do films create meanings?
How do these meanings relate to wider cultural meanings?
Require close analysis of the text 
7. 7 1   Textiness Claims made about a film, beyond simple explanation of it, require interpretation, and so require assumptions about how audiences consume texts. 
8. 8 1   Textiness Film studies used ‘semiotic’ and ‘structuralist’ approaches.
Asked: 
What codes are being used? 
How is meaning being generated?
Not: 
what is the inherent truth of the film 
9. 9 1   Textiness Tended to suggest ‘correct’ interpretations based on ‘decoding’ the films
But 
Focus on meaning neglects pleasures and feelings 
10. 10 1   Textiness Decoding model neglects variety of ways audiences make sense of a film
This makes it hard to predict the ‘meanings’ it will have or the ‘influences’ it may have.
 
11. 11 2.1	The Look Laura Mulvey and ‘Looks’
‘Visual pleasure and narrative cinema’
1975/1981 
12. 12 2.1	The Look Hollywood films usually active male characters and passive females.
Females often there to be looked at.
(changed since 1975?)
 
13. 13 2.1	The Look Film involves 3 different ‘looks’
Looks between characters
The look of the camera at the action
The look of the spectator at the screen 
14. 14 2.1	The Look On-screen looking, between characters:
Audience is positioned with the male, looking at the female
Not positioned with the female, looking at the male
 
15. 15 2.1	The Look So all spectators are ‘positioned’ as male 
16. 16 2.1	The Look 2	 The look of the camera at the action
The camera looks at the female differently from how it looks at the male: shots are positioned as male. 
17. 17 2.1	The Look 3	The look of the spectator at the screen
when the spectator looks at the screen they are moved by unconscious states and fantasies, explained by psychoanalysis.
Eg voyeurism, fetishism, scopophilia 
18. 18 2.1	The Look These are male, since the other ‘looks’ make them so:
We look at the female body, voyeuristically, as a male.
Sexualised looking 
19. 19 2.2 	Identification Another way of analysing our engagement with the film.
Suggests we ‘identify’ with a film or character, and our ‘identity’ is involved. 
20. 20 2.2 	Identification Some problems with ‘identification’
Suggests total absorption 
Suggests we’re compelled by the film to identify 
21. 21 2.2 	Identification Other terms may be more flexible
Eg
Involvement
Engagement
Investment 
22. 22 2.2 	Identification Capture the various movements of the looks of the film, the emotions and the mind of the spectator 
23. 23 2.2 	Identification Eg    Murray Smith   1995
Different levels of engagement:
Alignment
Allegiance
Keying  
24. 24 2.2 	Identification Alignment
Film offering access to action, thoughts, feelings of characters 
25. 25 2.2 	Identification Allegiance
Film marshalls our sympathies for or against characters
 
26. 26 2.2 	Identification Keying
Stressing of one character’s experience and tuning a sequence to that ‘key’ 
27. 27 2.2 	Identification Need to move from 
‘spectatorship’ - how the film might position the spectator,
to 
‘audiences’ - how actual people consume films 
28. 28 2.2 	Identification Eg Stacey (1994)
Studying 300 cinema goers of the 1940s
 
29. 29 2.2 	Identification Eg Barker Judge Dredd
‘Knowing Audiences’  1988
‘Bargained responses’
 
30. 30 3   Pleasures in Cinemagoing ‘Escapism’ often used to ‘explain’ pleasures.
Escape from what?
To what?
How is this affected by class, gender, race, etc?
 
31. 31 3   Pleasures in Cinemagoing Cinemagoing
Magical world of the movies
Part of the escape is the event and the place
 
32. 32 3   Pleasures in Cinemagoing Cinemas of the 1920s
Picture Palaces
In big cities
1500 seat cinemas
Ornate and deluxe buildings
Orchestras 
33. 33 3   Pleasures in Cinemagoing Thousands of light bulbs
Splendid rest rooms with paintings and mirrors 
Food and drink 
Comfort, safety, respect for working class people 
34. 34 3   Pleasures in Cinemagoing People are disposed to enjoy entertainment films as part of their trip out
may include modern commodities, activities, cultural structures. 
35. 35 4   Multiplexes British Cinema Exhibition
Spoilt for choice?  Multiplexes in the 90s
Stuart Hanson
2000 
36. 36 4   Multiplexes Latest generation of purpose built cinemas
Multiple screens
Superior technological features
Car parking
Computerised ticketing
Shopping and restaurant facilities 
37. 37 4   Multiplexes First: Kansas City, 1966
By 1980s, dominant in US and begin in Europe
UK 1st: 1985 Milton Keynes
10 screens
2000 seats
Restaurant, brasserie, bar, social club 
38. 38 4   Multiplexes Film choice
Comfort
Convenience
High quality facilities
Old cinemas closing… 
39. 39 4   Multiplexes Location and Design
Development of out of town shopping centre
Former industrial land
Appeal to motorist 
40. 40 4   Multiplexes Usually part of larger leisure developments
Cinema as one part of a leisure package, a ‘whole night out’
Make a lifestyle decision: going for an evening out
Not a product decision: going to see a particular film 
41. 41 4   Multiplexes Streamline process of getting people into a film and out again
Efficiency of scale: share car park, box office, toilets, etc
Telephone and computerised booking 
42. 42 4   Multiplexes Cinema admissions
1984	54 m
1987	79
1990	97
1994	124
1997	139 
43. 43 4   Multiplexes Growth of multiplexes
	Sites	screens	% of UK screens
1985		1	10		0.7
1990		52	452		27
1994		95	772		39
1997		142	1222		51 
44. 44 4   Multiplexes 5 Major companies, 88% screens 
Rank Odeon 630
National Amusements/Showcase 350
UCI 350
Warner Village 320
(Virgin: now sold) 
45. 45 4   Multiplexes Hanson: Illusion of quantity
Concession stand
Large portions of popcorn, coke: 80% profit
25% of cinema revenue is from concession stand
 
46. 46 4   Multiplexes Box office receipts are shared with distributor
‘we put people into the theatre to sell them popcorn and soda’
Surrendered the uniqueness of the cinema as a building
 
47. 47 4   Multiplexes Cinemagoing in uk traditionally dominated by 15-34 yr olds, but
multiplexes have broadened the audience…
Over 35s going more
A, B, C1s going more 
48. 48 4   Multiplexes Films held over for several weeks
Show Titanic on several screens, and won’t show independent films
No commitment to eclecticism, or faith in multiplex’s ability to transcend public taste
Major distributors place conditions on exhibitors 
49. 49 4   Multiplexes BUT
Multiplexes  helped revive a dying industry
Better than no cinema
Better than being uncomfortable, bad sight lines, no parking, etc. 
50. 50 4   Multiplexes 
UK  4 exhibition companies take:
55% screens
65% box office 
51. 51 5   Exhibition Majors control exhibition
Non-Hollywood product does not get much place
Hollywood: 
High production costs, marketing, stars: people want to see films… 
52. 52 5   Exhibition Independent film
Independent cinemas: 20% box office
Smaller budgets for marketing
Problems of access to cinemas
Independent producers and distributors have fewer outlets, despite more screens.
 
53. 53 Edinburgh Cinemas Cameo
Cineworld Edinburgh (Fountainpark)
Dominion
Filmhouse
Odeon
Odeon Wester Hailes
UCI Edinburgh (Kinnaird Park)
Vue Edinburgh (Omni, Greenside Place)
Vue Edinburgh Ocean 
54. 54 Edinburgh Cinemas Majors.   First Run cinemas:
Odeon		Lothian Rd
Odeon 	Wester Hailes
Vue 		Ocean Terminal
Vue  		Omni
UCI		Kinnaird Park
Cineworld   Fountain Park   
55. 55 Edinburgh Cinemas Non-majors:
Cameo	
(Oasis: the major independent film exhibitors in the UK)
Dominion	(Privately owned)
Filmhouse	
(Subsidised by: Scottish Screen/ Edin. Council) 
56. 56 Film Culture ‘Alternative Cinema Exhibition’?
UK Regional Film Theatres
Film in all its forms
Minority interest, alternative cinema
Arthouse cinema, foreign cinema
Promotion of film culture
Edinburgh Filmhouse
Glasgow Film Theatre 
57. 57 Film Culture Edinburgh Filmhouse
Glasgow Film Theatre
 
58. 58 Film Culture British Film Institute
Nourishing film culture:
Preservation
Exhibition
Production
Library/ Museum
Education
Sight and Sound 
59. 59 References Branson, G. 2000 ‘Movies Move Audiences’, Chapter 6 in Cinema and Cultural Modernity.  Oxford: OUPress
Hanson, S. 2000 ‘Spoilt for choice?  Multiplexes in the 90s’, Chapter 5 in R.Murphy (ed) British Cinema of the 90s. London: BFI