1 / 21

Chapter 3

Chapter 3. Resource based view. Differential performance of firms in the same industry Firm profitability driven by structure of assets within the firm Heterogenous and immobile assets Exploiting firm differences Dynamic capabilities view Internal view, whereas IO is an external view.

ferris
Download Presentation

Chapter 3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 3

  2. Resource based view • Differential performance of firms in the same industry • Firm profitability driven by structure of assets within the firm • Heterogenous and immobile assets • Exploiting firm differences • Dynamic capabilities view • Internal view, whereas IO is an external view

  3. The Resource-Based View Resources and Capabilities Resources: • • tangible and intangible assets of a firm • » tangible: factories, products intangible: reputation • four general categories • (Financial, Physical, Human, and Organization • used to conceive of and implement strategies Capabilities: • a subset of resources that enable a firm to take full advantage of other resources » marketing skill, cooperative relationships

  4. The Resource-Based View Resources and Capabilities Are these resources or capabilities? Firm Assets: Machinery ? Collective Product Design Skill ? Recruiting Skill ? Engineering Skill of Individuals ? Mineral Deposits ?

  5. Capabilities Source: Grant

  6. RBV Assumptions • Two critical assumptions of RBV: • Resource Heterogeneity • differences in resources among similar firms • Resource Immobility • costly for firms to acquire • What do these assumptions mean? • If one firm has resources that are valuable and other firms don’t AND if other firms can’t imitate these resources without incurring high costs, THEN the firm possessing the valuable resources will likely gain a sustained competitive advantage

  7. The VRIO Framework If a firm has resources that are: • valuable, • rare, and • costly to imitate, and… • the firm is organized to exploit these resources, then the firm can expect to enjoy a sustained competitive advantage.

  8. Applying the VRIO Framework The Question of Value • in theory: Does the resource enable the firm to exploit an external opportunity or neutralize an external threat? • the practical: Does the resource result in an increase in revenues, a decrease in costs, or some combination of the two? (Levi’s reputation allows it to charge a premium for its Docker’s pants)

  9. Applying the VRIO Framework The Question of Rarity • if a resource is not rare, then perfect competition dynamics are likely to be observed (i.e., no competitive advantage, no above normal profits) • a resource must be rare enough that perfect competition has not set in • thus, there may be other firms that possess the resource, but still few enough that there is scarcity (several pharmaceuticals sell cholesterol-lowering drugs, but the drugs are still scarce—look at prices)

  10. Applying the VRIO Framework Valuable and Rare If a firm’s resources are: The firm can expect: Not Valuable Competitive Disadvantage Valuable, but Not Rare Competitive Parity Competitive Advantage (at least temporarily) Valuable and Rare

  11. Applying the VRIO Framework The Question of Imitability • the temporary competitive advantage of valuable and rare resources can be sustained only if competitors face a cost disadvantage in imitating the resource » intangible resources are usually more costly to imitate than tangible resources and bundles of resources are more costly than single resources (Harley-Davidson’s styles may be easily imitated, but its reputation cannot)

  12. Costs of Imitation • Unique Historical Conditions • First mover advantages • Path dependence • Causal Ambiguity • Causal links between resources and competitive advantage may not be understood • Bundles of resources fog these causal links • Social Complexity • The social relationships entailed in resources may be so complex that managers cannot really manage or replicate them • Patents • Offer a period of protection if the firms is able to defend its patent rights • Can be a two-edged sword as firms disclosure may decrease costs of imitation by other firms

  13. Applying the VRIO Framework The Question of Organization • a firm’s structure and control mechanisms must be aligned so as to give people ability and incentive to exploit the firm’s resources • examples: formal and informal reporting structures, management controls, compensation policies, relationships, etc. • these structure and control mechanisms complement other firm resources—taken together, they can help a firm achieve sustained competitive advantage (3M Company – rewards innovation and risk-taking)

  14. The VRIO Framework Costly to Imitate? Exploited by Organization? Competitive Implications Economic Implications Valuable? Rare? Below Normal No No Disadvantage Parity Normal Yes No Temporary Advantage Above Normal Yes Yes No Above Normal Sustained Advantage Yes Yes Yes Yes

  15. Firm B’s Possible Responses Firm A (strategy decisions lead to competitive advantage) Competitive Dynamics of Resource Imitation Competitive Dynamics: • the strategic decisions and actions of firms in response to the strategic decisions and actions of other firms No Response Change Tactics Change Strategy

  16. “No Action” Response (Rolex Casio) Competitive Dynamics A firm may decide to take no action because: • the other firm is serving a different market • a response may hurt its own competitive advantage • it does not have the resources and capabilities to mount an effective response • it wants to reduce or manage rivalry in the market through tacit collusion

  17. Competitive Dynamics “Change” Responses Tactics (Tide) Strategy (Monsanto) • specific actions • a fundamental change in a firm’s theory » tweaking product characteristics • may be necessary if current strategy becomes obsolete • usually imitated so quickly that there is no advantage • a mimetic change may achieve parity, but not advantage • a ‘leap frog’ move may create advantage

  18. Competitive Advantage Resources & Capabilities The Resource-Based View • Valuable CA will be sustained if: • Rare • other firms’ costs of imitation are greater than benefit of imitation • Costly to Imitate • Organized to Exploit • the firm is organized to exploit advantages

  19. Entrepreneurial and International Application of the VRIO Framework The International Context Two Reasons for International Expansion: 1) to exploit current resource and capability advantages in a new market 2) to develop new resources and capabilities in a foreign market

  20. Entrepreneurial and International Application of the VRIO Framework The International Context Critical Caveat: • resources and capabilities that generate an advantage in one market may or may not generate an advantage in a new market Firms should re-apply the VRIO framework when entering new markets!!

  21. Internal Analysis Tells us: • what the firm should do, given the relative strengths and weaknesses of resources and capabilities Managers’ Job: • bundle resources and capabilities to achieve competitive advantage VRIO Framework Helps Managers Recognize Sources of Competitive Advantage

More Related