120 likes | 255 Views
This discussion at the Winter Forum on Real Estate Opportunity focuses on the pros and cons of joint ventures in real estate investing. Expert panelists highlight key advantages such as increased investment pools and operational expertise, while also addressing disadvantages like loss of control and complex negotiations. The session outlines important considerations for structuring joint ventures, including alignment of interests, partner roles, and negotiation of essential provisions. Attendees gain insights into whether joint ventures are worth pursuing compared to alternative investment structures.
E N D
Setting Up Joint Ventures: How Attractive is This Option? Winter Forum on Real Estate Opportunity and Private Fund Investing January 27, 2005 The Montage • Laguna Beach, California
James Chiboucas General Counsel KBS Realty Advisors, LLC Steven C. Koppel Partner Heller Ehrman Sanford Presant National Director of Opportunity Funds Ernst & Young LLP L. Bruce Fischer Partner Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Fred Pillon Partner Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Michael Schwartz Broker George Smith Partners, Inc. Panelists
Why Joint Venture The Deal? Is It Worth It? • Advantages to the Joint Venture Structure vs. Going It Alone • Increases the pool of investments available to investors • Allows investors to leverage their investments by investing in more properties • May provide operational and construction expertise to the investor • Provides property owners and/or operators with additional project equity without incurring additional debt
Why Joint Venture The Deal? Is It Worth It? • Disadvantages to Joint Venture Structure vs. Going it Alone • It is often times difficult to negotiate joint venture documents from both a time and cost perspective • There is almost always a greater loss of control by all parties then expected • The operator is often times required to give a greater portion of the economic upside then desired • The investor is often times required to assume responsibility for a greater portion of the economic downside then desired
Why Joint Venture The Deal? Is It Worth It? • Alternatives to the Joint Venture Structure Other Than Going It Alone • Origination of a mezzanine loan by the investor with the returns to which the investor is entitled mirroring what the investor would have received as a joint venture partner (may be easier and less costly to document then joint venture documents) • For development transactions, the entering into of a development management agreement by the developer/operator with the development fee mirroring what the developer would have received as the developer/joint venture partner
Key Ingredients To Structuring The Joint Venture Transaction • Understanding the roles of each joint venture partner • Why is each joint venture partner in the deal? (capital, operational/development know how or finder of the deal) • Who is to be responsible for capital short falls? • Who is to be the operator of the property? • Who is to provide guarantees required for project financing?
Key Ingredients To Structuring The Joint Venture Transaction • Alignment of interests (the transaction will only work to the extent that there is a fair and reasonable alignment of interests with respect to financial responsibility and control) • Knowing and being comfortable with your proposed joint venture partner (a joint venture relationship is like a marriage, it won’t work without a reasonable degree of trust) • Agreeing to the deal structure through the preparation of a simple, short form term sheet that sets forth the material terms of the joint venture relationship (preparation of some form of term sheet is critical to insure that there is a meeting of the minds up front)
Top Ten Negotiated Provisions • Entity Governance: Member managed / management committee • Major decisions requiring member / management committee approval; restrictions on authority • Dispute resolution procedures for major decision deadlocks/disagreements • Majority vote on management committee or super vote for a member • Invoking buy/sell provisions for certain deadlocks • Deadlock: parties are just required to work it out • Pre-project acquisition approvals; pre-closing agreement
Top Ten Negotiated Provisions • Degree of Control over Manager/Managing Member • Leasing activities subject to agreed upon leasing guidelines • Expenditures subject to an approved annual budget with agreed upon line item and cumulative variances • Use of Performance Hurdles
Top Ten Negotiated Provisions • Responsibility for Additional Capital Contributions and Remedies for Failure to Make Additional Capital Contributions • For development transactions, imposing responsibility on manager / managing member and capping responsibility • For non-development transactions, sharing of responsibility for capital shortfalls • Remedies for failing to make required capital contributions: capital contribution loans / additional capital contribution with penalty squeeze down/triggering of default / removal
Top Ten Negotiated Provisions • Distribution provisions and IRR / return calculations • Managing member’s responsibility to provide guaranties and indemnities in connection with project financing and continued liability under such guaranties and indemnities following removal • Right to remove the manager / managing member upon the occurrence of certain events • Exit strategies: forced sale of project / transferability of member interests / right of first offer in connection with sale of member interests