Aortic Stenosis

1 / 72

# Aortic Stenosis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aortic Stenosis. Kunjan Bhatt MD Austin Heart. Let’s Start off with some questions!. Question 1. Components for the continuity equation for AVA include all the following except? 1. MV annular diameter 2. MV annular VTI 3. AV VTI 4. LVOT diameter

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Aortic Stenosis' - emily

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### Aortic Stenosis

Kunjan Bhatt MD

Austin Heart

Question 1

Components for the continuity equation for AVA include all the following except?

1. MV annular diameter

2. MV annular VTI

3. AV VTI

4. LVOT diameter

5. All can be used in the continuity equation for the aortic valve

Question 2

Which of the following is not a marker of severe aortic stenosis?

• Vmax across the Aortic valve is > 4m/s
• Calculated aortic valve area of 1.34 cm2
• LVOT Vmx / AV Vmx ratio < 0.25
• Mean gradient = 55 mmHg
• The cardiologist said the valve was friggin’ tight!
Question 3

Which is a true statement

• Echo has become the gold standard for the assessment of Aortic valve stenosis
• Cath is still the gold standard for the diagnosis of Aortic stenosis
• No valve is too tight until the patient has syncope…
Question 4
• At maximal dobutamine infusion, in an AS patient, the peak LVOT velocity increased from 50 to 90 cm / sec., while the peak transaortic valve velocity increased from 2 to 2.3 m/sec. The LVOT diameter is 2 cm. This study suggests that:
• 1. The baseline ejection fraction was < 20%.
• 2. There is significant AR.
• 3. AS is not severe.
• 4 LV motion did not improve.
Question 5

The valve area is?

a) 0.3

b) 0.5

c) 0.8

d) 1.0

Question 6

A patient with severe aortic stenosis has MR. Which one of the following statements is incorrect?

• The peak mitral regurgitation jet velocity is higher than the peak trans-aortic valve flow velocity.
• The aortic transvalvular flow duration is shorter than the MR jet duration.
• The LVOT flow duration is longer than the MR jet duration.
Question 7

A patient with valvular AS has severe LVOT

obstruction (HOCM). The best way to evaluate

AS severity in this patient is:

1. Dobutamine echo.

2. Aortic valve area by planimetry (TEE)

3. Valve area using the continuity equation.

4. Mean aortic gradient (Bernouilli formula).

How do we assess the Aortic Valve
• AS jet velocity
• Valve area by continuity equation.
• Velocity Ratio (VTI ratio)
• Planimetry
Jet Velocity
• This is measured with Continuous wave doppler
• Multiple windows and “non-standard views” to look for the highest Vmax
• Apical and suprasternal or right parasternal most frequently yield the highest velocity;
• subcostalor supraclavicular windows may be required.
Aortic Jet Velocity
• Careful patient positioning and adjustment of transducer position and angle are crucial as velocity measurement assumes a parallel intercept angle between the ultrasound beam and direction of blood flow, whereas the 3D direction of the aortic jet is unpredictable and usually cannot be visualized.
• AS jet velocity is defined as the highest velocity signal obtained from any window after a careful examination
• Lower values from other views are not reported. The acoustic window that provides the highest aortic jet velocity is noted in the report and usually remains constant on sequential studies in an individual patient.
Aortic Jet Velocity Pitfalls
• Why multiple views?? Any deviation from a parallel intercept angle results in velocity underestimation; however, the degree of underestimation is 5% or less if the intercept angle is within 15° of parallel.
• “Angle correction”shouldnot be used because it is likely to introduce more error given the unpredictable jet direction.
• A dedicated small dual-crystal CW transducer is recommended both due to a higher signal-to-noise ratio and to allow optimal transducer positioning and angulation, particularly when suprasternal and right parasternal windows are used.
• However, when stenosis is only mild (velocity 3 m/s) and leaflet opening is well seen, a combined imaging-Doppler transducer may be adequate.

Continuous-wave Doppler of severe aortic stenosis jet

showing measurement of maximum velocity and tracing of the

velocity curve to calculate mean pressure gradient.

• The difference in pressure between the left ventricular (LV) and aorta in systole, or transvalvular aortic gradient, is another standard measure of stenosis severity.
• Gradients are calculated from velocity information, and peak gradient obtained from the peak velocity does therefore not add additional information as compared with peak velocity.
• However, the calculation of the mean gradient, the average gradient across the valve occurring during the entire systole, has potential advantages and should be reported.
• The maximum gradient is calculated from maximum velocity – modified Bernoulli equation.
• (assuming that viscous losses and acceleration effects are negligible)
• Mean gradient is calculated by averaging the instantaneous gradients over the ejection period, a function included in most clinical instrument measurement packages using the traced velocity curve.
Continuity Equation

Schematic diagram of continuity equation. The assumption is that SV LVOT = SV Aortic Valve

Continuity Equation
• Calculation of continuity-equation valve area requires three measurements:
• AS jet velocity by CWD
• LVOT diameter for calculation of a circular CSA
• LVOT velocity recorded with pulsed Doppler.
Continuity Equation
• LVOT diameter and PW of the LVOT needs to taken from the same location in the LVOT.
• LVOT diameter measured off of PLAX.
• LVOT velocity (or VTI) is measured apically – beware of distance error.
• The pulsed-Doppler sample volume is positioned just proximal to the aortic valve so that the location of the velocity recording matches the LVOT diameter measurement.
LVOT Diameter
• Left ventricular outflow tract diameter is measured in the parasternal long-axis view in mid-systole from the white–black interface of the septal endocardium to the anterior mitral leaflet, parallel to the aortic valve plane and within 0.5–1.0 cm of the valve orifice.
Velocity or VTI measurement

LVOT velocity is measured from the apical approach either in an apical long-axis view or an anteriorly angulated four-chamber view An optimal signal shows a smooth velocity curve with a narrow velocity range at each time point. Maximum velocity is measured as shown. The VTI is measured by tracing the modal velocity (middle of the dense signal)

Pitfalls of the Continuity Equation
• Depends on the variability in each of the three measurements, including both the variability in acquiring the data and variability in measuring the recorded data.
• AS jet and LVOT velocity measurements have a very low intra- and inter-observer variability (3–4%) both for data recording and measurement in an experienced laboratory.
• However, the measurement variability for LVOT diameter ranges from 5% to 8%. When LVOT diameter is squared for calculation of CSA, it becomes the greatest potential source of error in the continuity equation.
• When trans-thoracic images are not adequate for the measurement of LVOT diameter, TEE measurement is recommended if this information is needed for clinical decision-making.
Pitfalls of the continuity Equation
• When subaortic flow velocities are abnormal, for example, with dynamic subaortic obstruction or a subaortic membrane, SV calculations at this site are not accurate.
• Another limitation of valve area as a measure of stenosis severity is the observed changes in valve area with changes in flow rate.
• In adults with AS and normal LV function, the effects of flow rate are minimal and resting effective valve area calculations are accurate.
• This effect may be significant when concurrent LV dysfunction results in decreased cusp opening and a small effective orifice area even though severe stenosis is not present.
Velocity Ratios
• Another approach to reducing error related to LVOT diameter measurements is removing CSA from the simplified continuity equation. This dimensionless velocity ratio expresses the size of the valvular effective area as a proportion of the CSA of the LVOT.
• Can use VTI as well.
Velocity Ratios
• Severe stenosis is present when the velocity ratio is 0.25 or less, corresponding to a valve area 25% of normal.
• To some extent, the velocity ratio is normalized for body size because it reflects the ratio of the actual valve area to the expected valve area in each patient, regardless of body size. However, this measurement ignores the variability in LVOT size beyond variation in body size.
Aortic valve area planimetry.
• Multiple studies have evaluated the method of measuring anatomic (geometric) AVA by direct visualization of the valvular orifice, either by 2D or 3D TTE or TEE.
• Planimetry may be an acceptable alternative when Doppler estimation of flow velocities is unreliable.
• However, planimetry may be inaccurate when valve calcification causes shadows or reverberations limiting identification of the orifice.
• Caution is also needed to ensure that the minimal orifice area is identified rather than a larger apparent area proximal to the cusp tips, particularly in congenital AS with a doming valve.
• Effective orifice area, rather than anatomic, is the primary predictor of outcome.

As with all patients with aortic stenosis , the echocardiographic evaluation of adults with aortic valve disease should include evaluation of the aorta with measurement of diameters at the sinuses of Valsalvaand ascending aorta.

• Aortic root dilation is associated with bicuspid aortic valve disease, the cause of AS in 50% of adults and aortic size may impact the timing and type of intervention. In some cases, additional imaging with CT or CMR may be needed to fully assess the aorta

.

Bicuspid valves
• A bicuspid valve most often results from fusion of the right and left coronary cusps, resulting in a larger anterior and smaller posterior cusp with both coronary arteries arising from the anterior cusp (80% of cases), or fusion of the right and non-coronary cusps resulting in a larger right than left cusp with one coronary artery arising from each cusp (about 20% of cases). Fusion of the left and non-coronary cusps is rare.
Bicuspid Aortic Valves
• In Europe and the USA, bicuspid aortic valve disease accounts for 50% of all valve replacements for AS
• Calcification of a trileaflet valve accounts for most of the remainder, with a few cases of rheumatic AS.
• However, worldwide, rheumatic AS is more prevalent.
Subvalvular Aortic Stenosis
• Dynamic subaortic obstruction, for example, with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, refers to obstruction that changes in severity during ventricular ejection, with obstruction developing predominantly in mid-to-late systole, resulting in a late peaking velocity curve.
• Dynamic obstruction also varies with loading conditions, with increased obstruction when ventricular volumes are smaller and when ventricular contractility is increased.
Subvalvular AS
• Distinguished from valvular stenosis based on the site of the increase in velocity seen with color or pulsed Doppler and on the anatomy of the outflow tract.
• Subvalvular obstruction may be fixed, due to a discrete membrane or muscular band, with hemodynamics similar to obstruction at the valvular level.
Supravalvular stenosis
• Supra-valvular stenosis is uncommon and typically is due to a congenital condition, such as Williams syndrome
• Persistent or recurrent obstruction in adulthood
Pressure recovery
• What is Pressure Recovery?
• The Aortic Pressure measured by cath Distal to the orifice Is higher than at the orifice (pressure recovery).
• Therefore The AoV gradient measured by cath is LOWER then the the gradient measured by Doppler (which measures the “unrecovered” pressure)
• Aortic Valve area Calculated by cath may be Larger.
• The pressure recovery phenomenon is more prominent In patients with normal (not dilated) aortic root
Some pearls
• In heavy calcific valves, measuring the LVOT accurately may be difficult. In this situation, use another nonregurgitant valve (MV, PV, even TV) – remember in the spirit of conservation of flow, no shunts, and in the absence of significant regurgitation, the stroke volume through each valve should be the same!
More Pearls
• What to do in rhythms other than sinus.. Afib?
• Either average multiple beats for Vmax and VTI (at least 5).
• Alternatively use the highest velocity’s and their ratios
Other pearls – high cardiac output states
• High cardiac output in patients on Dialysis, with anemia, AV fistula, or other high flow conditions (tachycardia) may cause relatively high gradients in the presence of mild or moderate AS.
• This may lead to misdiagnosis of severe disease particularly when it is difficult to calculate AVA in the presence of dynamic LVOT obstruction.
• In this situation, the shape of the CWD spectrum with a very early peak may help to quantify the severity correctly.
Diastolic dysfunction and Aortic stenosis
• These patients generally have at least Stage I diastolic dysfunction – impaired relaxation but normal LV diastolic filling pressures
• As AS progresses, the diastolic function worsens (stages II – III).
• Presently Diastolic function is not being utilized for management for Aortic stenosis
• Diastolic function improves after AVR and this can be seen with tissue doppler (increase in 2cm/s)
Pitfalls
• Remember Pitfalls – other systolic phenomenon –
• Mitral regurgitation
• Tricuspid regurgitation
• Dynamic outflow obstruction
• Pulmonic stenosis
Mitral Regurgitation
• Differentiate from AS because the time duration of the 2 are different.
• Longer – MR
• Shorter AS
• Why – Time interval for AS is only during ejection of LV systole
• MR occurs during IVRT, CT, and IVCT.
• MR jet is usually ~ >4-5 m/s (unless LA pressure is high)
Tricuspid regurgitation
• Hopefully knowledge of position will help
• Look for significant respirophasic variation
Pitfalls – Dynamic outflow tract obstructions

Look for the late peaking dagger shaped profile. This should increase with valsalva (can change with loading conditions. Aortic Stenosis does not.

Stenosis – “Functional vs True”
• Low output, low gradient AS – is it the valve or the stinky LV function?
• Dobutamine is well validated and very helpful if done CAREFULLY!
• Dobutamine is a β - agonist and increases inotropy and chronotropy. Start at 5mcg/kg/min. Increase q3 minutes. Don’t go past 20 mcg/kg/min. Look for the LVOT velocity to increase to 0.8 – 1.2 m/s or the VTI to increase to 20-25 cm.
Stenosis – “Functional vs True”
• In a truly stenotic valve, the LVOT and AV velocities (and VTIs) increase proportionally.
• In pseudo - stenotic valve, the LVOT velocity
• (VTI) increases >>> AV VTI.
• Remember the ratio of ¼ (or 0.25) – the so called “dimensionless index”
• Dobutamine can also help determine inotropic reserve (an increase in stroke volume > 20%) – prognostic implications for patients.
Watch Out for discrepancies
• AS Velocity is < 4m/s and AVA < 1cm2
• Check LVOT diameter and compare to previous studies
• Check LVOT velocity signal for distance from valve
• Calculate a index AVA (AVA/BSA) when height is < 5’5”, BSA <1.5m2 or BMI is <22
• Evaluate for low trans-aortic flow volume
• LVOT stroke volume
• 2D LV EF and Stroke volume
• Mitral regurgitation
• Mitral stenosis
• If the EF is depressed – Consider dobutamine stress echo for assessment
• Causes – low cardiac output, small body size, severe mitral regurgitation
Watch Out for discrepancies
• AS Vmax > 4m/s but AVA > 1 cm2
• Check Lvot Diameter and check it obtained on previous studies
• Check for flow acceleration in LVOT PW signal
• Calculate a index AVA (AVA/BSA) when height is < 5’5”, BSA <1.5m2 or BMI is <22
• Evaluate the severity of AR
• Evaluate for high cardiac output
• LVOT Stroke volume
• 2D LV EF and stroke volume (LVEDV – LVESD)
• Possible causes are high output state, moderate-severe AR, large body size
Question 1

Components for the continuity equation for AVA include all the following except?

1. MV annular diameter

2. MV annular VTI

3. AV VTI

4. LVOT diameter

5. All can be used in the continuity equation for the aortic valve

Question 1

Components for the continuity equation for AVA include all the following except?

1. MV annular diameter

2. MV annular VTI

3. AV VTI

4. LVOT diameter

5. All can be used in the continuity equation for the aortic valve

Question 2

Which of the following is not a marker of severe aortic stenosis?

• Vmax across the Aortic valve is > 4m/s
• Calculated aortic valve area of 1.34 cm2
• LVOT Vmx / AV Vmx ratio < 0.25
• Mean gradient = 55 mmHg
• The cardiologist said the valve was friggin’ tight!
Question 2

Which of the following is not a marker of severe aortic stenosis?

• Vmax across the Aortic valve is > 4m/s
• Calculated aortic valve area of 1.34 cm2
• LVOT Vmx / AV Vmx ratio < 0.25
• Mean gradient = 55 mmHg
• The cardiologist said the valve was friggin’ tight!
Question 3

Which is a true statement

• Echo has become the gold standard for the assessment of Aortic valve stenosis
• Cath is still the gold standard for the diagnosis of Aortic stenosis
• No valve is too tight until the patient has syncope…
Question 3

Which is a true statement

• Echo has become the gold standard for the assessment of Aortic valve stenosis
• Cath is still the gold standard for the diagnosis of Aortic stenosis
• No valve is too tight until the patient has syncope…
Question 4
• At maximal dobutamine infusion, in an AS patient, the peak LVOT velocity increased from 50 to 90 cm / sec., while the peak transaortic valve velocity increased from 2 to 2.3 m/sec. The LVOT diameter is 2 cm. This study suggests that:
• 1. The baseline ejection fraction was < 20%.
• 2. There is significant AR.
• 3. AS is not severe.
• 4 LV motion did not improve.
Question 4
• At maximal dobutamine infusion, in an AS patient, the peak LVOT velocity increased from 50 to 90 cm / sec., while the peak transaortic valve velocity increased from 2 to 2.3 m/sec. The LVOT diameter is 2 cm. This study suggests that:
• 1. The baseline ejection fraction was < 20%.
• 2. There is significant AR.
• 3. AS is not severe.
• 4 LV motion did not improve.
Question 5

The valve area is?

a) 0.3

b) 0.5

c) 0.8

d) 1.0

Question 6

A patient with severe aortic stenosis has MR. Which one of the following statements is incorrect?

• The peak mitral regurgitation jet velocity is higher than the peak trans-aortic valve flow velocity.
• The aortic transvalvular flow duration is shorter than the MR jet duration.
• The LVOT flow duration is longer than the MR jet duration.
Question 6

A patient with severe aortic stenosis has MR. Which one of the following statements is incorrect?

• The peak mitral regurgitation jet velocity is higher than the peak trans-aortic valve flow velocity.
• The aortic transvalvular flow duration is shorter than the MR jet duration.
• The LVOT flow duration is longer than the MR jet duration.
Question 7

A patient with valvular AS has severe LVOT

obstruction (HOCM). The best way to evaluate

AS severity in this patient is:

1. Dobutamine echo.

2. Aortic valve area by planimetry (TEE)

3. Valve area using the continuity equation.

4. Mean aortic gradient (Bernouilli formula).

Question 7

A patient with valvular AS has severe LVOT

obstruction (HOCM). The best way to evaluate

AS severity in this patient is:

1. Dobutamine echo.

2. Aortic valve area by planimetry (TEE)

3. Valve area using the continuity equation.

4. Mean aortic gradient (Bernouilli formula).