1 / 37

Towards a climatology of the SE US coastal ocean

Towards a climatology of the SE US coastal ocean. H. Seim, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill L Leonard, University of North Carolina at Wilmington M. Fletcher, University of South Carolina D. Savidge, Skidaway Institute of Oceanography C. Edwards, Florida State University.

dale
Download Presentation

Towards a climatology of the SE US coastal ocean

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Towards a climatology of the SE US coastal ocean H. Seim, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill L Leonard, University of North Carolina at Wilmington M. Fletcher, University of South Carolina D. Savidge, Skidaway Institute of Oceanography C. Edwards, Florida State University

  2. Why a circulation climatology? In general: • Simple characterization of existing data • Important source of validation for models • Motivate archival scheme For the SE United States coastline: • Confirm existing depictions and develop digital form • Examine adequacy of observing system design • Study the dynamics of the flow field

  3. Depiction of Seasonal Cycle by Lee, Yoder and Atkinson (1991), Based on big DOE-funded deployments in ‘70s and ‘80s Only variability Winter/Spring Summer Fall Distinguishes 3 shelf regimes, inner (<20 m), middle (20-40 m) and outer (>40m), and the Gulf Stream. Cartoon depicts Gulf Stream, outer and mid shelf. No mean flow presentation

  4. Blanton et al. 2004 – digital model climatology, forced by mass field and climatological winds (COADS) – inner shelf regime hard to distinguish, limited northern extent

  5. Observing System measurement locations (for SABSOON, Caro-COOPs, CORMP, NCCOOS and NDBC) 19 stations occupied between 2000-2007, inner and mid-shelf Area under study In this talk

  6. What’s new? • Bight-wide coverage over 5+ years • Better vertical resolution of currents • Inclusion of nearshore (10m or less) • Not so good: • No observations seaward of 40m isobath - Disparate moorings and data management systems

  7. Coverage over time in the ‘climatology’ for ADCPs– only months with 50% or greater coverage are included

  8. Seasonal depiction – consider: • Winds • Limited temperature/salinity time series • Depth-averaged currents • Depth-varying currents

  9. 0.03 N/m2 Wintertime Fairly uniform SE wind stress Dominated by cold-air outbreaks

  10. Wintertime 20 cm/s 40m Depth-averaged flow 400m • Similar to mean • Reasonable comparison to model 20m Mean position of GS

  11. Feb bottom temp Feb surf temp Blanton bottom temp clim. Blanton climatology

  12. Feb surf salinity Feb bot salinity Blanton surface salinity clim Blanton climatology

  13. Depth (m) Depth-resolved flow - February • Generally little vertical structure • Exception at nearshore stations

  14. Summer Bermuda-high dominated Northward wind stress

  15. Summer SC Depth-averaged flow Whole shelf in motion to NE Minimum flow off SC – signature of gyre? Model underestimates inner shelf flow

  16. Jul bottom temp Jul surf temp Blanton bot temp clim Blanton climatology

  17. July surf salinity July bot salinity Blanton climatology Blanton Surf salinity

  18. 20 cm/s SC Depth-resolved flow - July Depth (m) • Significant vertical shear/veering • Consistent with upwelling • Should promote nutrient delivery from GS

  19. Fall Strong southward wind stress Strength increases seaward

  20. Fall SC Depth-averaged flow GA Reduced flow at 40 m isobath Southward flow on middle, inner shelf Minima off SC again Schematic captures flow well Model misrepresents inner, middle shelf

  21. Oct surf temp Oct bot temp Blanton Bot Temp climatology Blanton climatology

  22. Oct surf salinity Oct bot salinity Blanton climatology Blanton Surf Salinity clim

  23. 20 cm/s Depth-resolved flow - October Depth (m) Flow strongest on inner shelf Weak offshore bottom flow

  24. Cape Fear 0.005 N/m2 Depth-averaged mean currents and average winds • Weak mean flow (5 cm/s or less) • inshore of 30 m isobath, divergent • GS-influenced poleward flow seaward • of 40 m isobath • Near-zero flow S off SC • Topographic steering – flow largely • along isobaths • Mean winds are weak and variable 50m 15m

  25. MAB depth-averaged mean current – equatorward and relatively uniform Lentz, JGR, 2008

  26. Some notion of dynamics: Wind stress weak – but curl? Alongshore pressure gradient important but possibly non-constant Cross-shelf baroclinic gradient - working on it.

  27. Role of Charleston Bump? Does turn of GS at the Bump change the surface elevation on the shelf? Could explain the slowdown/reversal in alongshelf flow off SC

  28. Summary • Assembled ADCP observations largely confirm qualitative depiction of Lee et al (1991) • Digital climatology of Blanton et al (2004) fails to represent inner shelf and equatorward mid-shelf flows • Strong upwelling circulation in summer is evident • Downwelling circulation present in fall/winter/spring but not shelf-wide • Reduced mean flow off SC consistent with gyre influence but gyre not represented in observations. Other form of GS influence?

  29. MONTHLY MEAN ALONG- AND CROSS-SHORE CURRENT Climatological along-shore monthly mean wind (scaled 1cm/s:1m/s) At Station Off GA Depth (m above bottom) Depth (m above bottom) SSW NNE On-shore CROSS Off-shore ALONG

  30. Baringer/Larsen

  31. Blaha, JGR ’84 found coherent monthly averagedsea level variationsalong shelf (’55-’75 period, heatingand atmos. presseffects removed).Can be more than 20 cm variation annually. Postulated due toGulf Stream transportvariations.

  32. Noble/Gelfenbaum – modeled coastal SL impact of GS transport variations. Low transport Gulf Stream Average transport Coast Offshore Fixed “Hinge” Low transport, higher CSL Shelf Gulf Stream Average transport Coast High transport Offshore Fixed “Hinge” High transport, lower CSL Shelf

More Related