1 / 35

Prognostic and Predictive Factors: Current Evidence for Individualized Therapy

Prognostic and Predictive Factors: Current Evidence for Individualized Therapy. Predictive Molecular Markers: Hormone Receptor Status Presented by Kathleen I Pritchard Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre and The University of Toronto Toronto, Canada. PROGNOSTIC FACTORS.

chione
Download Presentation

Prognostic and Predictive Factors: Current Evidence for Individualized Therapy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Prognostic and Predictive Factors: Current Evidence for Individualized Therapy Predictive Molecular Markers: Hormone Receptor Status Presented by Kathleen I Pritchard Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre and The University of Toronto Toronto, Canada

  2. PROGNOSTIC FACTORS PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FACTORS WHICH PREDICT THE RISK OF RECURRENCE OR DEATH INDEPENDENT OF THERAPY

  3. PREDICTIVE FACTORS PREDICTIVE FACTORS FACTORS WHICH PREDICT THE LIKELIHOOD OF RESPONSE TO A GIVEN THERAPY

  4. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR AND PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR  BOTH PREDICTIVE AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS

  5. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR EXPRESSED IN 60-70% OF BREAST CANCERS  A WEAK BUT FAVOURABLE PROGNOSTIC FACTOR

  6. ESTROGEN AND PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR OBJECTIVE RESPONSE RATE

  7. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR  RESPONSE RATES INCREASE WITH INCREASING LEVELS OF ESTROGEN RECEPTOR PROTEIN WITLIFF 1988

  8. ER AND PgR MEASUREMENT METHODS  LIGAND BINDING OR BIOCHEMICAL DONE ON A “SLURRY” OF TISSUE  YIELDS AN AVERAGE VALUE IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL DONE ON A SECTION  CAN LOCALIZE RECEPTOR  1-10% OF CELLS STAINING STILL POSITIVE

  9. COMPARISON OF ER AND/OR PgR IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL METHODS TO OLDER LIGAND BINDING OR BIOCHEMICAL METHODS EXCELLENT REVIEW BY CRAIG ALLRED et al MODERN PATHOLOGY 1998; 11 (2): 155-168  STRESSES VALIDATION OF NEW TEST METHODOLOGY WITH CLINICAL OUTCOME AS WELL AS WITH OLDER TEST METHODOLOGY

  10. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR IHC  PREPARATION OF TISSUE  TYPES OF ANTIBODIES  ARBITRARY  SCORING  INTERPRETATION  REPORTING

  11. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR LB = LIGAND ASSAY BINDING IHC = IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL IHC and LB  80-90% CONCORDANT

  12. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF ER BY IHC ~ 10-15% RECURRENCE/SURVIVAL BENEFIT IN WOMEN WHO DO NOT RECEIVE HORMONAL ADJUVANT THERAPY  CONFIRMED IN AT LEAST FOUR TRIALS INVOLVING UNTREATED WOMEN

  13. DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL OF WOMEN RECEIVING HORMONAL THERAPY

  14. DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL OF WOMEN RECEIVING HORMONAL THERAPY

  15. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR PREDICTIVE VALUE OF ER BY IHC  20 STUDIES  1200 WOMEN  ER +ve ~ 70% RR  ER -ve < 15% RR

  16. PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR PG-R  AN ER-RELATED GENE PRODUCT  INDICATES WHETHER THE ESTROGEN / E.R. REGULATED PATHWAYS ARE INTACT

  17. PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR  LB vs IHC  ~ 70% CONCORDANCE IHC RR PgR +ve 70% PgR-ve < 10%

  18. PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR  IHC  TISSUE PREPARATION  TYPES OF ANTIBODIES  SCORING  INTERPRETATION  REPORTING

  19. PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR  WEAK PROGNOSTIC FACTOR  ~ 5% DIFFERENCE IN 713 UNTREATED WOMEN

  20. DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL OF WOMEN RECEIVING HORMONAL THERAPY

  21. DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL OF WOMEN RECEIVING HORMONAL THERAPY

  22. PREDICTIVE VALUE OF RECEPTORS PHENOTYPE INCIDENCE RESPONSE RATE ER + PgR+ 58% 77% ER + PgR- 23% 27% ER - PgR+ 4% 46% ER - PgR- 15% 11% McGuire 1991

  23. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR PREDICTIVE VALUE FOR CHEMOTHERAPY  PROPOSED AS A PREDICTIVE FACTOR FOR CHEMOTHERAPY RESPONSE  ER -ve  MORE LIKELY TO RESPOND TO CHEMO LIPPMAN ET AL NEJM 1978

  24. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR PREDICTIVE VALUE FOR CHEMOTHERAPY  SUBSEQUENTLY REJECTED AS A PREDICTIVE FACTOR BASED ON CONTRADICTORY DATA FROM A SERIES OF SMALL STUDIES IN METASTATIC DISEASE

  25. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR  AC vs AC T  DIFFERENCE MAINLY IN ER -ve  LITTLE DIFFERENCE IN ER +ve HENDERSON ET AL ASCO 2000

  26. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR  OXFORD OVERVIEW  SUGGESTION IN SOME ANALYSES THAT WOMEN WITH ER NEGATIVE TUMOURS BENEFIT MORE FROM CHEMOTHERAPY COLE, LANCET 2001 COATES, LANCET 1998

  27. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MECHANISMS  BREAST CANCER DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION DIRECTLY RELATED TO EFFECTS OF ESTROGEN  ER  A NUCLEAR RECEPTOR  FUNCTIONS AS A TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR CONTROLLING ESTROGEN RELATED GENES

  28. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MECHANISMS  LIGAND BINDING  RECEPTOR CONFORMATION  INTERACTION OF RECONFORMED RECEPTOR WITH  COREGULATORS  RESPONSE ELEMENTS IN PROMOTOR REGIONS OF TARGET GENES (ERE)  ALL CONTRIBUTES TO NET ESTROGENIC EFFECTS IN A CELL

  29. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MECHANISMS  POLYPEPTIDE GROWTH FACTORS AND THEIR MEMBRANE RECEPTORS ALSO CONTRIBUTE TO BREAST CANCER DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION  SIGNALS THROUGH VARIOUS PROTEIN KINASE PATHWAYS ENHANCE CELL SURVIVAL AND PROLIFERATION

  30. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MECHANISMS  THESE PATHWAYS ALSO INTERACT WITH ESTROGEN RECEPTOR  KINASES IN GROWTH FACTOR CASCADE CAN PHOSPHORYLATE AND ACTIVATE ER  ER IN TURN ACTIVATES AND AUGMENTS SIGNALING IN GROWTH FACTOR PATHWAYS

  31. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MECHANISMS  SIGNALING THROUGH GF PATHWAYS MAY CONTRIBUTE TO HORMONAL RESISTANT STATES BY LIGAND - INDEPENDENT ACTIVATION OF ER  THUS TARGETING GF PATHWAYS IN ADDITION TO ER MAY PROVIDE BETTER THERAPY

  32. ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MECHANISMS  CLASSIC HORMONAL THERAPIES  BIOLOGIC AGENTS  ANTI HER-2  HERCEPTIN  OTHERS  ANTI EGF  IRESSA  OTHERS

  33. PREDICTIVE MOLECULAR MARKERS: HORMONE RECEPTOR STATUSCONCLUSIONS  STILL CRUCIAL IN SELECTION OF HORMONAL THERAPY  MEASUREMENTS MUST BE STANDARDIZED  TISSUE PREPARATON  ANTIBODY USED  SCORING  INTERPRETATION  REPORTING

  34. PREDICTIVE MOLECULAR MARKERS: HORMONE RECEPTOR STATUSQUESTIONS ?ER / PgR  ROLE IN SELECTING CHEMOTHERAPY ?Her 2 - Neu  ROLE IN SELECTING CHEMOTHERAPY  ROLE IN SELECTING HORMONAL THERAPY ?EGF - R (Erb - B1)  ROLE IN SELECTING THERAPY

  35. PREDICTIVE MOLECULAR MARKERS: HORMONE RECEPTOR STATUSQUESTIONS ?OPTIMAL USE OF COMBINATIONS OF CLASSIC HORMONAL AND BIOLOGIC FACTORS ?OPTIMAL GUIDANCE OF THIS COMBINED THERAPY BY CAREFUL STANDARDIZATION OF LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS

More Related