1 / 20

Magdalena Wrembel Teacher Training College, UAM, Poznań

Phonological "know that" or "know how"? - in pursuit of determinants of second language pronunciation attainments. Magdalena Wrembel Teacher Training College, UAM, Poznań. Introduction. The paper reports on the results of a specially designed training programme;

Download Presentation

Magdalena Wrembel Teacher Training College, UAM, Poznań

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Phonological "know that" or "know how"? - in pursuit of determinants of second language pronunciation attainments Magdalena Wrembel Teacher Training College, UAM, Poznań

  2. Introduction • The paper reports on the results of a specially designed training programme; • aims at investigating the effectiveness of explicit instruction and the role of theoretical training; • expects to demonstrate patterns of change in pronunciation performance on pre-test / post-test measures; • seeks to verify the hypothesis that conscious knowledge leads to the formation of mental representations; • attempts to account for other variables related to L2 pronunciation acquisition.

  3. Outline of the presentation • Background studies • Theoretical framework • Rationale and goals • Experimental design • Results of the study • Conclusions  implications for pronunciation pedagogy

  4. Studies on predictors of success • Purcell & Suter 1980 - futility of instruction • Dickerson 1983 - effectiveness of phonological rules • Champagne et al. 1988 - perceptual training • Dziubalska-Kołaczyk 1990 -formal > natural setting • Elliott 1995 - formal instruction • Gayoso et al. 1999 - meta & phonological training • Stasiak & Szpyra-Kozłowska 2003 - aural exposure & drilling vs. phonetic instruction • Waniek-Klimczak 2004 - phonetic universals • Baran 2004 - field independence

  5. "Know how" or "know that" ? • RATIONALE: need for investigations into the effectiveness of pronunciation instruction • ASSUMPTION: pronunciation improves through gradual monitoring of an acquired system based on metacompetence • METACOMPETENCE: conscious knowledge of the grammar of a language (e.g. phon. & phon. - metaphonological competence) • FRAMEWORK: NATURAL PHONOLOGY • (D. Stampe & P. Donegan,W. U. Dressler)

  6. Model of acquisition of L2 phonology acc. to Nat. Phon. • L2 learner - reduced phonological system • only selected processes available • confronted with L2 subconsciously applies L1 processes • IF processes L1 = L2  positive transfer • IF L1  L2  L1 interference • (lacking L2 processes have to be learnt consciously as rules)  explicit instruction, metacompetence ! • Successful access to phonological processes conditioned by sociological, psychological & linguistic factors

  7. Goals of the study • To find correlation between L2 pronunciation attainment & theoretical training • "know that" > "know how" • To investigate other potential determinants of pronunciation success

  8. Experimental design • Participants: 33 first year students • Timing: Oct 2002 - Feb 2003 • Course: 50 hours, 15 weeks • Groups: • control  practical training • experimental  practical + theoretical instruction • Hypothesis: Metacompetence as a determinant of L2 pronunciation success

  9. Participants - control factors analysis • Age: 19 - 25 (M: 20;6) • Length of formal exposure: 5 - 13 (M: 9) • First contact with English: 5 - 16 (M: 10;6) • Stay in UK / US - 35% • Lack of previous phonetic training • Formal setting of instruction • Comparable language proficiency • Positive attitude and high motivation (PAI)

  10. Instruments and test administration • Perception tests: • Oxford Placement Listening Test (Allan 1992) • Vowel Recognition Test (VRT) • Production tests: • LIST - reading a list of 50 words or phrases • DIAL - reading a dialogue in pairs • SPEECH - extemporaneously produced narrative

  11. Instruments and test administration (2) • Task-related variability • Digitally recorded speech samples • CoolEdit96 (22kHz, 16-bit resolution) • 3 judge listeners • interrater reliability (.93 - .67)

  12. Treatment - course content & procedures • Practical training - exposure & imitation: • auditory sensitisation and discrimination • articulatory warm-up • phonetic drills • dialogue reading and performing • speeches and presentations • teacher correction (audio, visual & kinaesthetic feedback)

  13. Treatment - course content & procedures (2) • Theoretical training: • articulatory descriptions • C & V systems classification • contrastive analysis • theoretical readings and discussions • visual aids reinforcement • meta-awareness raising

  14. Cycles of practice modes (cf. Morley 1991) • Imitative (dependent) speech practice • pronunciation drills with a model • Rehearsed (guided) speech practice • oral script reading & pre-prepared presentations • Independent practice • spontaneous presentations, self-generated content

  15. PRONUNCIATION PERFORMANCE - experimental group • TOTAL improvement by 18 % • LIST by 42 % • DIAL by 20 % • SPEECH by 8 % • PERC by 3 %

  16. PRONUNCIATION PERFORMANCE- control group • TOTAL improvement by 13 % • LIST by 26 % • DIAL by 16 % • SPEECH by 6 % • PERC by 4.4 %

  17. PRETEST / POSTTEST CHANGE - EXPERIMENTAL VS. CONTROL

  18. Correlational analysis of variables

  19. Implications for further research • To replicate the experiment on: • a larger sample • a more heterogeneous sample • To measure the effectiveness of innovative techniques • To enhance instruments for measuring perception

  20. Conclusions • Explicit pronunciation training: • improvement in overall phonetic accuracy • phonological metacompetence - determinant of success • Conscious knowledge of phonological processes facilitates: • formation of mental representations • self-organisation of the new phonological system • Implications for foreign language learning: • metalinguistic awareness raising • supplementing practical phonetic training with theoretical instruction in phonetics and phonology

More Related