1 / 25

Lecture Five: WH-Movement

Lecture Five: WH-Movement. Ian Roberts igr20@cam.ac.uk. PS-Rules/X’-Theory. Generate well-formed structural descriptions “create” trees/labelled bracketings More (X’) or less (PS-rules) abstract Can create infinite structures. Another type of rule. Movement rules:

apu
Download Presentation

Lecture Five: WH-Movement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture Five: WH-Movement Ian Roberts igr20@cam.ac.uk

  2. PS-Rules/X’-Theory • Generate well-formed structural descriptions • “create” trees/labelled bracketings • More (X’) or less (PS-rules) abstract • Can create infinite structures

  3. Another type of rule Movement rules: • Don’t create structures but manipulate them • Technically, they map phrase markers into other phrase markers • Informally, constituents “move” from one place in the structure to another

  4. Types of movement • Head-movement, as in English subject-auxiliary inversion in questions: John can leave.  Can John t leave? • CP • | • C’ • ru • C TP • Can ru • NP T’ • John ru • T VP • t | • V • win

  5. “NP-movement” • as in the English passive: The policeman arrested the student  The student was arrested t TP ru NP T’ ru ru D N T VP The studentwas ru V NP arrested t

  6. WH-Movement • The most important and interesting type of movement for various reasons. • Moves (almost) any XP to the beginning of the sentence to form, in the simplest case, a question.

  7. Examples of WH-movement • Which man will John see t ? -- object NP • Who should John talk to t ? – indirect object NP (“preposition stranding”) • To whom can John talk t ? – indirect object PP (“pied-piping”) • How angry is Alex t ? -- AP • What does John believe t ? – CP • TP and VP do not undergo WH-movement

  8. Echo questions “Echo-questions” show where the wh-phrase originates: Bill bought WHAT?! You talked to WHO?!

  9. Where does the WH-phrase move to? CP ru NP C’ ru ru D N C TP Which man will ru NP T’ | ru N T VP John t ru V NP seet

  10. Indirect questions I wonder .. • which man John will see t ?-- object NP • who John talk should to t ? – indirect object NP (“preposition stranding”) • to whom John can talk t ? – indirect object PP (“pied-piping”) • how angry Alex is t ? -- AP • what John believes t ? – CP • Just like direct questions except no subject-aux inversion. • C must be empty here (no that/if/whether)

  11. Subject questions • Who t saw John? • “vacuous movement”: CP ru NP C’ | ru N C TP Who ru NP T’ t ru T VP ru V NP sawJohn

  12. Indirect subject questions • I wonder who t saw John ? • *I wonder who did t t see John ? • *I wonder who that/if t saw John ? • *I wonder that/if who saw John ? C must always be empty in indirect subject questions like all other indirect questions.  Movement to SpecC’ always, accompanied by a zero [+wh] C.

  13. “Long-distance” WH-movement • Which man did you say (that) John will see t ? -- object NP • Who did you say (that) John will talk to t ? – indirect object NP (“preposition stranding”) • To whom did you say (that) John will talk t ? – indirect object PP (“pied-piping”) • How angry did you say (that) Alex is t ?-- AP • What did you say (that) John believes t ? – CP

  14. WH-movement is an unbounded dependency • Who did you say [ that Mary believes [ that John saw t ]] ? • Who did you say [ that Mary believes [ that Fred knows [ that John saw t ]]] ? • Who did you say [ that Mary believes [ that Fred knows [ that I asserted [ that John saw t ]]] ? • .. and so on.

  15. Movement and PS-rules • The unbounded nature of WH-islands poses a problem for PS-rules/X’theory because • PS-rules/X’-theory are local: they define little bits of the tree at a time, e.g. VP  V CP How does VP “know” it’s part of a wh-dependency as in: • Who did you say [ that Mary [VP believes [CPthat John saw t ]] ?

  16. So.. • Either we complicate the PS-rules/X’-theory hugely (this can be and has been done) or we have two relatively simple rule types: • PS-rules/X’-theory build structure (create phrase markers) • Movement/transformational rules manipulate structure (map phrase markers into other phrase markers)

  17. Movement rules • WH-movement: Move a WH-phrase to the specifier of a [+wh] C. • “NP-movement”: move the object to the subject position (passive) • Head-movement: move T to C (subject-aux inversion) (The last two can be generalised; WH-movement is already in quite a general form here).

  18. Locality • Although WH-movement is unbounded, it doesn’t apply just anywhere, but is subject to stringent locality conditions, cf.: • my guitar, John’s cat – possessor NP in Spec of higher NP: NP1 ru NP2 N’1 | | N’2 N1 | cat N2 guitar John’s my • And similarly for whose cat

  19. But • If you want to know whose cat you’re talking about: • Whose cat did you feed t ? – object NP • *Whose did you feed [NP t cat ] ? – can’t apply WH-movement directly to the possessor, but must “pied-pipe” the whole object.

  20. A Locality Condition • The Left Branch Constraint (LBC): WH-movement can’t apply to a left-branch, or to part of a left branch. • So, whose can’t move on its own. Cf also: How angry is Alex t ? -- AP-movement *How is Alex [AP t angry ] ? – no movement just of Spec of AP.

  21. Resumptive pronouns Sometimes a pronoun appears where a gap could be: John, I like (him). John, I like {him/t}. Pronouns don’t obey island constraints: *Whose did you say that you like [NP t cat ]? Whose cat did you say that you like t ? ?Who did you say that you like his cat ? Marginally (in English) a resumptive can link to a WH, but only in an island.

  22. Three properties of WH-movement • The LBC is one of several constraints on WH-movement called “island constraints” (islands are things that are difficult move off). In general, WH-movement: • Leaves a gap • Is unbounded • Obeys the LBC (and other island constraints)

  23. Clefting again • Recall the constituency test clefting: John wrote the book  It was John that wrote the book.

  24. Clefting as WH-movement: • It leaves a gap *It was John that he wrote the letter. • It can be unbounded It was John that Mary said that Bill thinks t wrote the letter. • It obeys LBC: *It was John’s that I saw [NP t cat ].

  25. Conclusion • We need movement rules alongside PS-rules/X’-theory • Three types of movement • WH-movement involves unbounded dependency • WH-movement leaves a gap, obeys LBC • Clefting is a type of WH-movement (albeit a bit hidden)

More Related