1 / 33

REDUCING THE GROWTH OF MOTOR VEHICLE CO 2 EMISSIONS THROUGH 2050: EFFICIENCY, LOW-EMISSION FUELS AND ADVANCED TECHNOLO

REDUCING THE GROWTH OF MOTOR VEHICLE CO 2 EMISSIONS THROUGH 2050: EFFICIENCY, LOW-EMISSION FUELS AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES Carmen Difiglio U.S. Department of Energy (carmen.difiglio@hq.doe.gov) Erice Seminars on Planetary Emergencies August 20, 2007

albert
Download Presentation

REDUCING THE GROWTH OF MOTOR VEHICLE CO 2 EMISSIONS THROUGH 2050: EFFICIENCY, LOW-EMISSION FUELS AND ADVANCED TECHNOLO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. REDUCING THE GROWTH OF MOTOR VEHICLE CO2 EMISSIONS THROUGH 2050: EFFICIENCY, LOW-EMISSION FUELS AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES Carmen Difiglio U.S. Department of Energy (carmen.difiglio@hq.doe.gov) Erice Seminars on Planetary Emergencies August 20, 2007

  2. Five Approaches to Reducing CO2 Emissions in Motor Vehicles • Improve fuel efficiency on current-technology vehicles. • Introduce new vehicle concepts that have lower emissions. • Substitute gasoline and diesel fuel with lower-emission fuels. • Shift to lower-emission travel modes. • Reduce travel.

  3. Examples of IncrementalImprovements and their Cost

  4. Main Advanced Concepts • Hybrid Vehicles (now commercialized) • “Toyota” system hybrids (2 or 4 electric motors) provide ~40% fuel savings and cost ~ $5,000. • “Honda” system hybrids (1 motor) provide ~30% fuel savings and cost ~ $3,000 (more cost-effective). • Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles (under development) • Plug-ins offer some degree of electric-vehicle operation with substantial cost increase for additional batteries. • Electric Vehicles • Probably niche markets due to limited energy density. • Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles (longer term) • Other Alternative Fuel or Fuel Flexible Vehicles

  5. Lower Emission Fuels • Cellulosic Ethanol (~ 90% reduction) • Biodiesel Fuel (~ 70% reduction) • Ethanol from sugar (~ 60% reduction) • Hydrogen (100% reduction to increased emissions depending on energy source and end-use efficiency) • Electricity (100% reduction to increased emissions depending on energy source and end-use efficiency) • Compressed Natural Gas (~ 30% reduction) • Liquefied Natural Gas (~ 20% reduction) • Ethanol from Corn (~ 20% reduction) • Liquefied Petroleum Gas (~ 20% reduction) • Methanol (< 10% reduction) • Gas-to-Liquids (5% higher; lower with CCS) • Coal-to-Liquids (110% higher; ~ 2% higher with CCS)

  6. GHG Impacts of Alternative Fuels(2000 U.S. Data)

  7. Hydrogen Production Costs(Gas Reforming the Least Expensive – Solar the Most Expensive)

  8. Barriers to the Uptake of H2 Vehiclesby 2050 • Fuel cells need to cost ~ $50/kW to be competitive. • On board H2 is an unsolved problem (low energy density implies limited vehicle range between refueling). • Infrastructure investment for vehicles, fuel production and fuel distribution are all extremely high. • Without government intervention, vehicle manufacturers, fuel producers and fuel distributors face substantial investment risk (coordinated investment needed). • Low-emission sources of H2 are expensive and would be best used to decarbonize the electric power sector first. • Nonetheless, many governments (e.g., U.S., Japan, E.U.) have significant programs to overcome these barriers. • Why? Fuel cell H2 vehicles still appear to offer the best long-term option to fully decarbonize transport.

  9. Biofuels Trends • Biofuels use is growing rapidly around the world due to market forces and government policies. • The cost-effectiveness of biofuels GHG reductions is improving due to higher oil prices. • Sugar ethanol GHG reductions are essentially free. • Advanced biofuels processes could provide greater GHG reductions and use non-food feedstocks. • Global biofuels potential appears substantial and free trade could benefit many less-developed countries.

  10. Energy Technology Perspectives Model Primary energy Conversion sectors/processes Final energy Demand sectors/processes Useful energy Electricity production Industry Fossil fuels Gasoline Natural gas Electricity Coke Hydrogen Heat etc. Refineries Heating Cooling Power Moving etc. Coke ovens Transport Renewables Heat production Residential/ commercial Nuclear Hydrogen production

  11. Reference Case: Distribution ofCO2 Emissions from LDVs in 2000

  12. Reference Case: Distribution ofCO2 Emissions from LDVs in 2050

  13. Policy Actions Analyzed to ReduceCO2 Emissions In Motor Vehicles • Fuel Economy/Advanced Technology Vehicles • Establish or raise fuel efficiency standards. • Alternatively use “feebates.” • Subsidize the purchase of advanced technology vehicles. • RD&D to develop improved advanced vehicles. • CO2 taxes/value. • Low Emission Fuels • Establish mandates to use minimum levels of qualified low-emission fuels. • Subsidize low-emission fuels or alt-fuel vehicles. • RD&D to reduce the cost to produce low-emission fuels. • CO2 taxes/value.

  14. Fuel Economy Pays Off Without Considering Climate Benefits This will have to be redone

  15. CO2 Values Have to be High toInfluence Fuel Efficiency

  16. Reference Case: Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy [litres/100 km)

  17. Policy Scenario: Market Penetration of Biofuels

  18. Emissions Growth – Reference, High-Tech,Carbon Policy & Biofuels Scenarios

  19. Emissions Growth – Reference, High-Tech,Carbon Policy & Biofuels Scenarios

  20. CO2 Intensity – Reference, High-Tech,Carbon Policy & Biofuels Scenarios

  21. Sustainable vs. UnsustainableBiofuels Development • Biofuels should not be developed if they: • Compromise food supplies and food aid. • Replace rain forests and other CO2 sinks. • Adversely affect bio-diversity. • Deplete water supplies. • All governments should adopt sustainability safeguards in their biofuels policies.

  22. Example: Indonesian Palm Oil • Indonesia’s 1997-8 forest and peatland fires were equivalent to 40% of all global emissions from burning fossil fuels that year (Nature, November 7, 2002). • 600 million tonnes of carbon released annually from draining peat for plantations • Most Indonesian Palm Oil has net emissions through: • 1. forest clearance • 2. peat decomposition • 3. both (where swamp forest is cleared for new oil palm plantations, as in areas of Riau and Jambi)

  23. Biofuel Observations • Palm oil production in former rain forests do not provide net CO2 emission benefits except after 5-6 decades. • Therefore, rain forest palm oil/sugar cane is a counterproductive GHG mitigation strategy (& it has a catastrophic impact on biodiversity). • Available biomass resources can also be used to reduce emissions in the power generation sector. • The current interest in biofuels is mainly driven by two factors: agricultural policies and oil security policies.

  24. Conclusions • Rapid growth of motor vehicles outside of EU and NA will increase motor vehicle emissions. • Nonetheless, reducing this growth is necessary to combat higher GHG concentrations. • We conclude that improving motor vehicle efficiency is the win-win GHG strategy. • Advanced technologies combined with regulatory policies can significantly reduce the growth of motor vehicle emissions without imposing high taxes/values on CO2 emissions. • CO2 taxes would have relatively small impacts on transport relative to other energy sectors.

  25. BACKUP SLIDESREDUCING THE GROWTH OF MOTOR VEHICLE CO2 EMISSIONS THROUGH 2050: EFFICIENCY, LOW-EMISSION FUELS AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES Carmen Difiglio U.S. Department of Energy Erice Seminars on Planetary Emergencies August 20, 2007

  26. Reference Case: Distribution ofCO2 Emissions from Transport in 2000 & 2050

  27. High Plug-in Hybrid Scenario

  28. CO2 Intensity with High Plug-InScenario

  29. Power Sector Carbon Intensity

  30. ETP Model Regions OECD-Regions • US • Canada • Mexico • Western Europe • Eastern Europe • Japan • Australia and New Zealand • South Korea Non-OECD Regions • FSU • China • India • Rest of Asia • Latin America • Africa • Middle East

  31. Technology Choice in MARKAL Technology Characteristics Energy Sources Used Efficiency Costs (Capital and O&M) Availability Dynamic LP Optimization Energy Resources Cost and Availability Energy Service Demands By Sector/Region Technology Mix for Each Time Period That Satisfies Energy Demand Given Constraints Other Assumptions Long-Term Discount Rate System Reserve Requirements Other Constraints Max. CO2 Emissions by Time Period

  32. How Hybrids Work • Hybrid-electric vehicles (HEVs) combine the benefits of gasoline engines and electric motors. • They can be configured to obtain different objectives, such as improved fuel economy, increased power, or additional auxiliary power for electronic devices and power tools. • Some of the advanced technologies typically used by hybrids include • Regenerative Braking • Electric Motor Drive/Assist • Automatic Start/Shutoff

  33. A Typical Hybrid Vehicle

More Related