SSC Pacific Autonomous/Unmanned Systems Industry Day Welcome

1. SSC PacificAutonomous/Unmanned SystemsIndustry Day Welcome 21 July 2011 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

2. Agenda 1300 – 1315 CAPT Joseph Beel, SSC Pacific Commanding Officer Opening Remarks 1315 – 1330 Ms. Jessica BlackIntroductions & Administrative Information 1330 – 1345 Ms. Rachel VolnerDoD Funding Perspective 1345 – 1415 Mr. Robin LairdUnmanned Systems Experience Technical Overview 1415 – 1445 Ms. Jessica Black Acquisition Overview 1445 – 1515 Break 1515 – 1600 Questions & Answers (ALL) 1600 – 1700 Networking (ALL) Small UGV payload development Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

3. Introductions • Distinguished Guest • Jessica Black, Contracting Officer • Robin Laird, Technical Team • Mike Bruch, Technical Team • Stephen Jason, Technical Team • Rachel Volner, Corporate Strategy Group • Small Business Representatives • Industry Representatives UAV support to Navy-UCAS Program Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

4. Administrative Information • Safety • Questions & Cards Proprietary or Business Sensitive Questions • SOWs and Consortium White Paper • Briefing Slides Will Be Posted on Fed Biz Ops at: https://www.fbo.gov • SB Assistance or 1-on-1 Meetings UUV support to EOD teams Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

5. SSC PacificAutonomous/Unmanned SystemsIndustry Day DoD Funding Perspective Ms. Rachel Volner 21 July 2011 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

6. Outline • Unmanned Systems Today • The Budget • Current Priorities FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

7. Unmanned Systems Today FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

8. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

9. Global Drone Deployment FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

10. Navy “Family of Systems” • Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (BAMS) • Long-endurance remotely operated signals intelligence • Airborne support for MDA and battlespace preparation • Medium-Range Unmanned Aerial System (MRUAS) • Sea-based medium-endurance signals intelligence • Support for Special Operations Forces • Unmanned Carrier Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike (UCLASS) • Carrier-based intelligence and precision strike • FireScout • Real-time ISR • Battle management • Target classification FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

11. The Budget FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

12. Where We Are in the Budget Process • FY 2012 National Defense Authorization • House Armed Services Committee • Senate Armed Services Committee • Full House • Full Senate • FY 2012 Defense Appropriations Bill • House Appropriations Committee • Senate Appropriations Committee • Full House • Full Senate FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

13. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

14. The President’s Budget For FY2012:Unmanned Aircraft Systems FY2012 base budget: $4.8 billion to develop and procure UAS • Global Hawk / BAMS (RQ-4): • 3 aircraft, $1.7 billion • Predator class (MQ-1/9): • 84 aircraft, $2.5 billion • Other, smaller UAS: • 1308 aircraft, $0.6 billion UAS Funding (In Billions) $5.1 $4.8 $4.5 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

15. Current Priorities FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

16. DSB: COIN ISR Operations TABLE OF CONTENTS • Role of DoD ISR in COIN – identify customers and requirements • Allocation & use of DoD ISR resources for COIN • Changes in ISR process to improve support to COIN • Improve network agility & information sharing • Emerging technologies & methodologies FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

17. Emerging Technologies & Methodologies • Computational social sciences / social network analysis • Behavior modeling and simulation • Natural resource monitoring • Overhead video surveillance • Improvements to characterizing terrain • Processing, exploitation and dissemination (PED) • Human terrain data collection and management • Terrestrial SensorWebs • Biometrics • Natural language processing • Operations research • Cross domain technologies FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

18. Emerging Technologies & Methodologies • Overhead video surveillance • Longer persistence, wider field of view, better resolution, better geo‐locational accuracy, and multiple phenomenologies, all with real‐time downlink. • Processing, exploitation and dissemination (PED) • Cloud computing • Spatio-temporal • Cross-domain and classification • Terrestrial SensorWebs • Space‐based, airborne, mobile, in situ, and terrestrial remote sensor could be accessed as web‐accessible services which can flexibly be re‐deployed and re-orchestrated FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

19. A Sneak Peek … Key Challenges • Interoperability • Autonomy • Airspace Integration • Communications • Training • Propulsion and Power • Manned-Unmanned Teaming FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

20. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

21. SSC PacificAutonomous/Unmanned SystemsIndustry Day Technical Overview Mr. Robin Laird 21 July 2011 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

22. Outline • Terms of Reference • Government Experience • Focus and Need • Scope Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

23. Terms of Reference • Autonomous System • Fully independent, unattended, or automatic operation • E.g., unattended ground sensor • Unmanned System • Requiring no on board human operator • E.g., unmanned air vehicle • Levels of Autonomy • Ability of a system to sense, perceive, analyze, communicate, plan, make decisions, and act to achieve its goals as assigned (teleop, autonomous) • Platform • Vehicle (for mobile systems) or remote system (for stationary) • Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV), Unmanned Air System (UAS), Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV), Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV), Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV), Unattended Ground Sensor (UGS) Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

24. Terms of Reference (cont) • ID • Information Dominance • C4ISR • Command, Control, Computers, Communications, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance • Full Spectrum • Efforts covering analysis, research, development, test, evaluation, deployment, fielding, operation, experimentation, and logistics • RDT&E • Research, development, test, and evaluation • Prototype • Pre-production model (a design, system, solution, approach) Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

25. Government Experience • More than 250 years combined experience in autonomous and unmanned systems development dating back to the 1980’s and before • More than 40 active projects in autonomous and unmanned systems RDT&E, engineering, and acquisition • Significant existing partnerships with industry, academia, DoD, and other Federal Agencies in pursuit of common interests in autonomous/unmanned systems • Desire to build upon Government experience and grow valued partnerships in order to better support current and future customers Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

26. Government Experience (cont) • Example projects in… • Air • Land • Sea Surface • Undersea • Overarching/Cross Domain • A small % of our autonomous/unmanned systems work Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

27. Government Experience: Air MQ-4C Broad Area Maritime Surveillance UAS (BAMS UAS) NAVAIR PMA-262 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

28. Government Experience: Land Automatically Deployed Communication Relays NAVEODTECHDIV and SSC Pacific Section 219 S&T Investment Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

29. Government Experience: Sea Surface Unmanned Surface Vehicle Control and Monitoring HCI ONR Code 342 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

30. Government Experience: Undersea Explosive Ordnance Disposal Unmanned Underwater Vehicles PMS-408 (EOD) Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

31. Government Experience: Autonomy Autonomous Capability Suite (ACS) Joint Ground Robotics Enterprise and PMS-408 (EOD/CREW) Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

32. Focus and Need • Requirements are focused on the integrated development of cross-domain solutions emphasizing the ID and C4ISR aspects of autonomous/unmanned systems and related technologies. • Government need encompasses: • Other Transaction Agreement (OTA): • Full spectrum RDT&E of prototype autonomous/unmanned systems and supporting technologies; access to non-traditional partners. • Multiple Award Contract (MAC): • Support to the Government in the development, fielding, operation, and limited production of autonomous/unmanned systems and supporting technologies. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

33. Scope: OTA Statement of Work • Prototype RDT&E • Requirements analysis defining prototype systems • Material solution analysis supporting prototype development • Rapid prototyping • Research leading to prototype systems capabilities • Advanced technology development of prototype systems • Systems engineering of prototype systems • Demonstrations involving prototype solutions • Operations and maintenance of fielded prototype systems • Exercise and experimentation incorporating prototype systems • Modeling and simulation of prototype capabilities • Security engineering of integrated prototype systems Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

34. Scope: MAC Statement of Work • System Development and Support • Requirements generation and analysis • Material solution analysis • Rapid product development • Basic and applied research • Advanced technology development • Engineering and manufacturing development • Limited production and deployment • Operations and support • Exercise and experimentation support • Modeling and simulation • Security engineering Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

35. Summary • Overarching technical focus is on full-spectrum development of integrated multi-domain autonomous and unmanned system solutions supporting ID and C4ISR • OTA scope of work focused on prototype development • MAC scope of work supports broad range of research and engineering activities • Contract actions support current customer base as well as future autonomous/unmanned systems needs of the Navy Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

36. SSC PacificAutonomous/Unmanned SystemsIndustry Day Acquisition Overview Ms. Jessica Black 21 July 2011 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

37. Outline • Objective • Multiple Award Contract (MAC) vs. Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) • OTA Defined • Non-Traditional Contactor Defined • OTA Process • Consortium: • Membership Agreement (CMA) • Evaluation Factors • Acquisition Timeline • Summary Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

38. Objective • Outline a Proposed Acquisition Approach to Facilitate both Traditional Acquisition for non-Prototype Research and Engineering Efforts and an Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) Acquisition for the Collaboration of Non-Traditional/Traditional Contractors and Academia in providing innovative technology solutions for Autonomous and Unmanned Systems Prototype Technology Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

39. Multiple Award Contract (MAC) & Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) • Both will focus on Autonomous and Unmanned Systems • MAC: More traditional and encompassing • Possible 3-year base with two 1-year options • Processed in parallel with the OTA • Includes scope of the OTA but also encompasses sustainment and operational support. • SOW sections are of equal importance. • OTA: Prototype efforts only • Suggestions for structure welcomed! Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

40. Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) Defined • A legally binding instrument. Defined by what it is NOT • Contract • Grant • Cooperative agreement • TIA/PIA/CRADA • So unique it doesn’t even have its own name Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

41. OTA Defined (continued) • Two types of OTAs: In this instance, for prototype projects that are directly relevant to weapons or weapon systems proposed to be acquired or developed by the DoD (Prototype OT/Section 845 OT) • Authority: Section 845 of National Defense Authorization Act of 1994(PL 103-160), as amended. • In this instance, must be at least one nontraditional defense contractor participating to a significant extent Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

42. Non-Traditional Contractor Defined • In the last year or more, has not entered into or performed: • (1) any procurement contract that is subject to full coverage under the cost accounting standards • (2) any FAR based procurement contract in excess of $500,000 • Significant participation is just that; accomplishing a significant amount of the effort Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

43. OTA Process • Partnership with a consortium Only one OTA with only one (1) consortium • Requirements executed through the OTA • Via the designated consortium entity exclusively Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

44. OTA Process (continued) • OTA will include • Consortium Membership Agreement (CMA) as attachment • Annual Project Plan as deliverable • Research Prototype Projects Process • Consortium will present Research Prototype Projects • Government will evaluate all Research Prototype Projects • Projects accepted will be funded and executed under the OTA Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

45. OTA Process (for Project Selection) Government Evaluation/ Project Selection Proposals submitted to the Government Selected proposals funded and implemented under the OTA Requests for Project Proposals submitted to the Consortium “The OTA Process” Designated Single Point Entity Consortium Members Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

46. CONSORTIUM – Consortium Membership Agreement (CMA) • Evaluation guidelines • The CMA provides for a set of rules and procedures • Allocates risks, responsibilities, rewards • Establishes and maintains relationship • Single focus point for Government • Government is not a member • Evidence of all members’ commitments to the project Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

47. CONSORTIUM – CMA (continued) • Elements of a Successful Consortium • Partner selection • Senior management involvement/commitment • Clearly understood rules • Communication among partners • Clearly defined objectives • Someone firmly in charge who is the focus for Government Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

48. CONSORTIUM – CMA (continued) • Management Committee Established • Empowered to determine ALL issues on behalf of consortium • Empowered to represent the consortium Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

49. CONSORTIUM – CMA (continued) • Management Committee (cont’d) • Majority Rule NOT Unanimous Vote • Simple majority for some issues • Larger majority for stated significant issues • Establish a quorum rule • Decide if different members have different voting rights (or none at all) based on contributions to effort Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

50. CONSORTIUM – CMA (continued) • Establish Membership Process • Procedure to admit new members • Procedure to terminate membership • Establish Publication Guidelines • Establish Dispute Resolution Process • Establish Process for Source Selection amongst Members Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.